Literature DB >> 29916932

Comparison of Fixation Techniques for Acetabular Fractures Involving the Anterior Column with Disruption of the Quadrilateral Plate: A Biomechanical Study.

Christian May1, Mike Egloff2, Andre Butscher1, Marius Johann Baptist Keel2, This Aebi3, Klaus Arno Siebenrock2, Johannes Dominik Bastian2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients who have sustained an acetabular fracture involving disruption of the quadrilateral plate (QLP), postoperative loading of the joint beyond the level of partial weight-bearing can result in medial redisplacement of the QLP. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare the performances of 4 different fixation constructs intended to prevent medial redisplacement of the QLP.
METHODS: Anterior column posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fractures with disruption of the QLP were created on synthetic hemipelves (fourth-generation Sawbones models) and subsequently stabilized with (1) a 12-hole plate bridging the QLP (Group 1), (2) the plate with added periarticular screws along the QLP (Group 2), (3) the plate combined with an infrapectineal buttress plate (Group 3), or (4) the plate with the added periarticular screws as well as the buttress plate (Group 4). The point of load application on the acetabulum was defined to be the same as the point of application of maximum vertical hip contact force during normal walking. Loads were applied to simulate either partial weight-bearing (20 cycles, from 35 to 350 N) or inadvertent supraphysiologic loads (linearly increasing loads until the onset of failure, defined as fragment displacement of >3 mm). A universal testing machine was synchronized with a digital image correlation system to optically track redisplacement at the QLP. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: During experimental simulation of partial weight-bearing, maximum fracture step openings never exceeded 2 mm. During simulation of inadvertent supraphysiologic load, the median load to failure was higher (p < 0.05) in Group 2 (962 N; range, 798 to 1,000 N) and Group 4 (985 N; range, 887 to 1,000 N) compared with Group 1 (445 N; range, 377 to 583 N) and Group 3 (671 N; range, 447 to 720 N).
CONCLUSIONS: All 4 fixation constructs performed in an acceptable manner on testing with simulated partial weight-bearing. Only additional periarticular screws along the QLP increased the fixation strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Redisplacement of the QLP resulting in an incongruency of the hip joint has been associated with poor long-term outcomes. Within the constraints of this study, periarticular long screws were superior to infrapectineal buttress plates in preventing medial redisplacement of the QLP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29916932     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

1.  Use of a stainless steel locking calcaneal plate for quadrilateral plate buttress in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Guilherme Boni; Robinson E Pires; Gustavo T Sanchez; Fernando B Dos Reis; Richard S Yoon; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-08

2.  Comparison of two reinforcement rings for primary total hip arthroplasty addressing displaced acetabular fractures: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Becker; M Winkler; C von Rüden; E Bliven; P Augat; H Resch
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Biomechanical comparison of acetabular fracture fixation with stand-alone THA or in combination with plating.

Authors:  Lisa Wenzel; Sabrina Sandriesser; Claudio Glowalla; Boyko Gueorguiev; Mario Perl; Fabian M Stuby; Peter Augat; Sven Hungerer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups.

Authors:  Nico Hinz; Julius Dehoust; Matthias Münch; Klaus Seide; Tobias Barth; Arndt-Peter Schulz; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Maximilian J Hartel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  The effect of an infra-acetabular screw for anatomically shaped three-dimensional plate or standard plate designs in acetabulum fractures: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  I Graul; I Marintschev; A Pizanis; S C Herath; T Pohlemann; T Fritz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific plates for the treatment of acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral plate disruption.

Authors:  Canbin Wang; Yuhui Chen; Liping Wang; Di Wang; Cheng Gu; Xuezhi Lin; Han Liu; Jiahui Chen; Xiangyuan Wen; Yuancheng Liu; Fuming Huang; Lufeng Yao; Shicai Fan; Wenhua Huang; Jianghui Dong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Which radiograph is most accurate for assessing hip joint penetration in infra-acetabular screw placement?

Authors:  Eic Ju Lim; Seungyeob Sakong; Wonseok Choi; Jong-Keon Oh; Jae-Woo Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Biomechanical Comparison of Different Fixation Techniques for Typical Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly: The Role of Special Quadrilateral Surface Buttress Plates.

Authors:  Kaifang Chen; Fan Yang; Sheng Yao; Zekang Xiong; Tingfang Sun; Xiaodong Guo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.