Raghu Durvasula1, Janet Kelly2, Anneliese Schleyer3, Bradley D Anawalt4, Shabir Somani5, Timothy H Dellit6. 1. Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle. 2. Assistant Director of Pharmacy Services, University of Washington Medical Center. 3. Associate Professor of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington. 4. Professor of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington. 5. Chief Pharmacy Officer and Assistant Dean, University of Washington School of Pharmacy. 6. Professor of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As healthcare costs rise and reimbursements decrease, healthcare organization leadership and clinical providers must collaborate to provide high-value healthcare. Medications are a key driver of the increasing cost of healthcare, largely as a result of the proliferation of expensive specialty drugs, including biologic agents. Such medications contribute significantly to the inpatient diagnosis-related group payment system, often with minimal or unproved benefit over less-expensive therapies. OBJECTIVE: To describe a systematic review process to reduce non-evidence-based inpatient use of high-cost medications across a large multihospital academic health system. METHODS: We created a Pharmacy & Therapeutics subcommittee consisting of clinicians, pharmacists, and an ethics representative. This committee developed a standardized process for a timely review (<48 hours) and approval of high-cost medications based on their clinical effectiveness, safety, and appropriateness. The engagement of clinical experts in the development of the consensus-based guidelines for the use of specific medications facilitated the clinicians' acceptance of the review process. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, a total of 85 patient-specific requests underwent formal review. All reviews were conducted within 48 hours. This review process has reduced the non-evidence-based use of specialty medications and has resulted in a pharmacy savings of $491,000 in fiscal year 2016, with almost 80% of the savings occurring in the last 2 quarters, because our process has matured. CONCLUSION: The creation of a collaborative review process to ensure consistent, evidence-based utilization of high-cost medications provides value-based care, while minimizing unnecessary practice variation and reducing the cost of inpatient care.
BACKGROUND: As healthcare costs rise and reimbursements decrease, healthcare organization leadership and clinical providers must collaborate to provide high-value healthcare. Medications are a key driver of the increasing cost of healthcare, largely as a result of the proliferation of expensive specialty drugs, including biologic agents. Such medications contribute significantly to the inpatient diagnosis-related group payment system, often with minimal or unproved benefit over less-expensive therapies. OBJECTIVE: To describe a systematic review process to reduce non-evidence-based inpatient use of high-cost medications across a large multihospital academic health system. METHODS: We created a Pharmacy & Therapeutics subcommittee consisting of clinicians, pharmacists, and an ethics representative. This committee developed a standardized process for a timely review (<48 hours) and approval of high-cost medications based on their clinical effectiveness, safety, and appropriateness. The engagement of clinical experts in the development of the consensus-based guidelines for the use of specific medications facilitated the clinicians' acceptance of the review process. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, a total of 85 patient-specific requests underwent formal review. All reviews were conducted within 48 hours. This review process has reduced the non-evidence-based use of specialty medications and has resulted in a pharmacy savings of $491,000 in fiscal year 2016, with almost 80% of the savings occurring in the last 2 quarters, because our process has matured. CONCLUSION: The creation of a collaborative review process to ensure consistent, evidence-based utilization of high-cost medications provides value-based care, while minimizing unnecessary practice variation and reducing the cost of inpatient care.
Entities:
Keywords:
cost-containment; medication utilization; pharmacy costs; practice transformation; process improvement; specialty medications; standardized review process; stewardship; value-based care
Authors: Harold C Standiford; Shannon Chan; Megan Tripoli; Elizabeth Weekes; Graeme N Forrest Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Vivian S Lee; Kensaku Kawamoto; Rachel Hess; Charlton Park; Jeffrey Young; Cheri Hunter; Steven Johnson; Sandi Gulbransen; Christopher E Pelt; Devin J Horton; Kencee K Graves; Tom H Greene; Yoshimi Anzai; Robert C Pendleton Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rebecca R Roberts; Bala Hota; Ibrar Ahmad; R Douglas Scott; Susan D Foster; Fauzia Abbasi; Shari Schabowski; Linda M Kampe; Ginevra G Ciavarella; Mark Supino; Jeremy Naples; Ralph Cordell; Stuart B Levy; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Alexa B D'Angelo; Drew A Westmoreland; Pedro B Carneiro; Jeremiah Johnson; Christian Grov Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 5.944
Authors: Stefanie W Benoit; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Katherine VandenHeuvel; David Witte; Christine Fuller; Jennifer Willis; Bradley P Dixon; Keri A Drake Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 3.418