Literature DB >> 31447536

Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution.

Kimberly M Lau, Katrina Derry, Ashley Dalton, Janine Martino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restricting oncology and hematology medications to outpatient infusion centers may be considered when infrequent administration is required, a low risk of serious adverse effects exists, or when prompt amelioration of a condition is not expected. At the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), we created a new formulary status for medications designated "formulary, outpatient-restricted use only." This designation could optimize payer reimbursement, as well as improve patient comfort, by negating the need for inpatient admission. When the inpatient administration of a restricted medication is requested at UCSD, there ensues a loosely defined review process involving an informal conversation between the requesting prescriber and the oncology pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) chair. Patient outcomes associated with this formulary status and informal request process are limited. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology and hematology medications in the inpatient setting at a single-center, academic, and comprehensive cancer center.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2017. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology or hematology medications that were administered in the inpatient setting and continued to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, hospice enrollment, disease progression status, level of evidence supporting the medication usage, and cost.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients and 24 outpatient-restricted medications met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (54%) medications were continued upon discharge and eight (33%) were not continued in the outpatient setting. Five of those eight medications were discontinued as a result of patient death.
CONCLUSION: In this single-center study, approximately one-third of the outpatient-restricted medications were not continued upon discharge. The findings suggest that our informal approval process could result in the suboptimal use of formulary outpatient-restricted medications for oncology and hematology indications. A more formalized request process might lead to the more effective utilization of these medications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; formulary; hematology; oncology; restricted

Year:  2019        PMID: 31447536      PMCID: PMC6679954     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P T        ISSN: 1052-1372


  22 in total

1.  ASHP guidelines on medication cost management strategies for hospitals and health systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system.

Authors:  Linda S Tyler; Sabrina W Cole; J Russell May; Mirta Millares; Michael A Valentino; Lee C Vermeulen; Andrew L Wilson
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Guidelines for Hospitalization for Chemotherapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  1996

4.  Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) in patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  Barbara Pro; Ranjana Advani; Pauline Brice; Nancy L Bartlett; Joseph D Rosenblatt; Tim Illidge; Jeffrey Matous; Radhakrishnan Ramchandren; Michelle Fanale; Joseph M Connors; Yin Yang; Eric L Sievers; Dana A Kennedy; Andrei Shustov
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Results of a pivotal phase II study of brentuximab vedotin for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Anas Younes; Ajay K Gopal; Scott E Smith; Stephen M Ansell; Joseph D Rosenblatt; Kerry J Savage; Radhakrishnan Ramchandren; Nancy L Bartlett; Bruce D Cheson; Sven de Vos; Andres Forero-Torres; Craig H Moskowitz; Joseph M Connors; Andreas Engert; Emily K Larsen; Dana A Kennedy; Eric L Sievers; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Guiding patients facing decisions about "futile" chemotherapy.

Authors:  Erin Alesi; Barton Bobb; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2011-09-24

7.  Comparative efficacy of triptorelin pamoate and leuprolide acetate in men with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  C F Heyns; M-P Simonin; P Grosgurin; R Schall; H C Porchet
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue?

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Mary Beth Landrum; Jeffrey M Souza; Bridget A Neville; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David J Kuter; James B Bussel; Roger M Lyons; Vinod Pullarkat; Terry B Gernsheimer; Francis M Senecal; Louis M Aledort; James N George; Craig M Kessler; Miguel A Sanz; Howard A Liebman; Frank T Slovick; J Th M de Wolf; Emmanuelle Bourgeois; Troy H Guthrie; Adrian Newland; Jeffrey S Wasser; Solomon I Hamburg; Carlos Grande; François Lefrère; Alan Eli Lichtin; Michael D Tarantino; Howard R Terebelo; Jean-François Viallard; Francis J Cuevas; Ronald S Go; David H Henry; Robert L Redner; Lawrence Rice; Martin R Schipperus; D Matthew Guo; Janet L Nichol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Hospital management of outpatient oncology treatment decisions: a survey to identify strategies and concerns.

Authors:  Edward Li; Ron Schleif; Bruce Edelen
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.