| Literature DB >> 29915355 |
Nachon Raethong1, Kobkul Laoteng2, Wanwipa Vongsangnak3,4.
Abstract
The cellular metabolic adaptations of Cordyceps militaris have been progressively studied. In particular, the cordycepin pathway is of interest in medicinal applications. Even though the metabolic pathways for cordycepin production are known to be related to different carbon sources, the regulatory mechanisms at a systems level are poorly characterized. To explore the regulatory mechanisms, this study therefore aimed to investigate the global metabolic response to cordycepin production in C. militaris through transcriptome analysis and genome-scale network-driven analysis. Here, transcriptome analysis of 16,805 expressed genes in C. militaris strain TBRC6039 grown on different carbon sources was performed. Of these genes, 2,883 were significantly differentially expressed genes, uncovering sucrose- and glucose-mediated changes in the transcriptional regulation of central carbon metabolism in C. militaris, which was shown using the CmSNF1 mechanism as an example. After applying genome-scale metabolic network-driven analysis, reporter metabolites and key metabolic subnetworks involving adenosine, cordycepin and methionine were proposed through the up-regulation of cordycepin biosynthetic genes. Our findings suggest that the transcriptional regulation of these pathways is a ubiquitous feature in response to specific culture conditions during cordycepin overproduction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29915355 PMCID: PMC6006141 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27534-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Growth characteristics and cordycepin production of C. militaris using different carbon sources.
| Features | Sucrose | Glucose | Xylose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum specific growth rate, μmax (day−1) | 0.25 ± 0.05a | 0.19 ± 0.02a | 0.10 ± 0.04b |
| Biomass productivityc (g/L/day) | 0.21 ± 0.01a | 0.23 ± 0.03a | 0.06 ± 0.01b |
| Extracellular cordycepin titer (mg/L) | 119.32 ± 14.06a,b | 109.14 ± 11.54a | 149.50 ± 15.71b |
| Extracellular cordycepin productivityd (mg/L/day) | 5.97 ± 0.70a | 5.46 ± 0.41a | 2.49 ± 0.21b |
a,bDifferent superscript letters in rows indicate statistically significant differences (p-value ≤ 0.05, Tukey’s test). All presented data of the growth characteristics were the highest values of individual cultures. Value is mean ± SD (n = 3).
cThe highest biomass productivities of sucrose, glucose and xylose cultures were obtained from the cultivations at 16, 14 and 60 day, respectively.
dThe highest extracellular of cordycepin productivities of sucrose, glucose and xylose cultures were obtained from the cultivations at 20, 20 and 60 day, respectively.
Figure 1Systematic workflow of transcriptome analysis and genome-scale network-driven analysis. (A) Cultivation process via transcriptome data generation using an Illumina HiSeq. 4000 sequencer. (B) Transcriptome data assessment through differential gene expression analysis across different carbon sources and subsequent gene clustering and reporter metabolite analysis.
Assembled de novo transcriptome statistics.
| Features | Sucrose | Glucose | Xylose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequencing depth (million paired-end reads) | 44.87 | 45.15 | 44.88 |
| Sequencing quality (%) | 98.69 | 98.84 | 98.77 |
| Number of expressed genes | 16,640 | 16,396 | 16,601 |
| Total number of expressed genes (Total number of protein sequences) | 16,805 (13,851) | ||
Figure 2Distribution of different functional categories in C. militaris transcriptome using the COGs database.
Figure 3The FPKM distribution against the density of protein-encoding genes and frequency of total expressed genes. Red line graph shows the FPKM distribution against the density of protein-encoding genes. Bar chart shows the FPKM distribution against the frequency of total expressed genes. Dashed line represents the FPKM under a cut-off of 1.0 (log10 (FPKM) = 0.0).
Figure 4Differentially expressed gene analysis across pairwise carbon source comparisons. (A) Volcano plots show the DEGs under −log10 (FDR) against the log2 (fold change) between pairwise carbon source comparisons. The red and blue dots represent significantly up- and down-regulated expressed genes (FDR ≤ 0.001), respectively. Black dots are not significant DEGs. (B) Horizontal bar chart shows the number of significant DEGs in each pairwise comparison set.
Figure 5A proposed regulatory model of carbon sources signaling mediated transcriptional responses in central carbon metabolism of C. militaris revealed by clustering analysis and transcription factor identification. (A) Heat map diagram shows different gene clusters across three carbon sources comparison. The representative genes and their functions are listed on the right of heat map. Each gene is colored by the normalized expression values (Z-scores) across different carbon sources. (B) Putative DNA motifs and transcription factors (TF) are involved in transcriptional regulation of central carbon metabolism. (C) A proposed regulatory model of sucrose- and glucose-mediated major changes in transcriptional regulation of central carbon metabolism in C. militaris as an example shown in regulation of CmSNF1 mechanism.
Statistical characteristics of enhanced genome-scale metabolic network.
| Characteristics of metabolic network | This study | |
|---|---|---|
| Enzymes-encoding genes | 2,929 | 1,170 |
| Enzymes | 714 | 679 |
| Metabolites | 947 | 894 |
| Biochemical reactions | 1,419 | 1,267 |
| - Plasma membrane | 89 | 87 |
| - Cytosol | 916 | 868 |
| - Mitochondria | 244 | 241 |
| - Peroxisome | 29 | 28 |
| - Extracellular space | 47 | 43 |
| Transport reactions | 94 | 0 |
| Reactions with gene assignments | 1,383 | 1,226 |
| Reactions without gene assignments (gap) | 36 | 48 |
Significant reporter metabolites affected by transcriptional up-regulation in response to sucrose compared to glucose cultures.
| Reporter metabolite | Distinct-directional p-value |
|---|---|
| Adenosine (ADN) | 0.001996 |
| Adenosine-3′-monophosphate (3AMP) | 0.001996 |
| 2′-carbonyl-3′-deoxyadenosine (2C3DA) | 0.001996 |
| Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) | 0.001996 |
| Adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP) | 0.001996 |
| S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) | 0.001996 |
| S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) | 0.001996 |
| 6-hydroxy-2-octaprenylphenol (2N6H) | 0.001996 |
| Cordycepin (3DA) | 0.003992 |
| Aspartate (ASP) | 0.005988 |
Figure 6Key metabolic subnetworks of adenosine, cordycepin and methionine identified in C. militaris. Abbreviated metabolites are as follows: PRPP, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate; AMP, adenosine-5′-monophosphate; 3AMP, adenosine-3′-monophosphate; SAICAR, phosphoribosylamino-imidazole-succinocarboxamide; 2N6H, 6-hydroxy-2-octaprenylphenol; SAM, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; SAH, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine; HCY, homocysteine; MET, methionine; 2NPMP, 6-methoxy-2-octaprenylphenol; 2C3DA, 2′-carbonyl-3′-deoxyadenosine.