Literature DB >> 29914611

Patterns of point-of-care test use among obstetricians and gynaecologists in the US.

Anne M Rompalo1, Neko Castleberry2, Lea Widdice3, Jay Schulkin2, Charlotte A Gaydos1.   

Abstract

Background Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for reproductive health conditions have existed for decades. Newer POCTs for syphilis, HIV and trichomonas are currently available and easy to use. We surveyed practicing obstetricians and gynaecologists to determine current POCT use and perceived obstacles to use.
METHODS: Between June and August 2016, 1000 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists were randomly selected and invited to complete a Qualtrics (222 West river Park Drive, Provo, Utah 84604, USA) survey; 600 of these were members of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network. Respondents who completed at least 60% of the survey were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 1000 selected members, 749 had valid emails and 288 (38%) of these participated in and completed the survey. Of the respondents, 70% were male with a mean of 18 years in practice. Detection of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) once or twice a week was reported by 30%, whereas 45% reported detecting STIs once or twice a month. POCTs used included pregnancy tests (83%), urine dipstick (83%), wet mount tests (79%) and the vagina pH test (54.8%). Few used Gram stain (5%) and stat rapid plasma regain tests (4%). Relatively newer US Food and Drug Administration-approved POCTs were used less frequently, with 25% of respondents reporting using the Affirm VPIII (Becton, Dickinson and Company, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ 07471, USA) test use and only 10% using a rapid HIV test. The most common perceived barriers to testing were the amount of reimbursement received for performing the test (61.9%) and the payment coverage from the patient (61.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: US obstetricians and gynaecologists rely on laboratory test results and traditional POCTs to diagnosis STIs. Future development and marketing of POCTs should consider not only ease and time of test performance, but also the cost of the tests to the practice and the patient, as well as reimbursement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29914611      PMCID: PMC6450764          DOI: 10.1071/SH17180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Health        ISSN: 1448-5028            Impact factor:   2.706


  17 in total

Review 1.  Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forward.

Authors:  R W Peeling; K K Holmes; D Mabey; A Ronald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  The performance of non-NAAT point-of-care (POC) tests and rapid NAAT tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections. An assessment of currently available assays.

Authors:  Gary Brook
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Are we satisfied with the tools for the diagnosis of gonococcal infection in females?

Authors:  Wen-Hsiang Su; Tsung-Shan Tsou; Chien-Sheng Chen; Tien-Yu Ho; Wen-Ling Lee; Yuan-Yi Yu; Tien-Jui Chen; Chia-Hsuan Tan; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.743

4.  Contemporary clinical issues in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology: findings of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network, 2001-2004: part I.

Authors:  Victoria H Coleman; Michael L Power; Stanley Zinberg; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.347

5.  Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections increases awareness and short-term abstinence in adolescent women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Lauren Simendinger; Sarah Griffeth; Hye Grace Kim; Jill S Huppert
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 6.  Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections: recent advances and implications for disease control.

Authors:  Joseph D Tucker; Cedric H Bien; Rosanna W Peeling
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.915

7.  Comparative effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis among women in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda R Barnes; Mary Jett-Goheen; Diane R Blake
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  D Scholes; A Stergachis; F E Heidrich; H Andrilla; K K Holmes; W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Point-of-Care Technology Research Network: Advancing Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Penny Ford Carleton; Steven Schachter; John A Parrish; John M Collins; J Benjamin Crocker; Ronald F Dixon; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Kent B Lewandrowski; James E Stahl; Catherine Klapperich; Mario Cabodi; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anne M Rompalo; Yukari Manabe; Tza-Huei Wang; Richard Rothman; Chris D Geddes; Lea Widdice; Joany Jackman; Rishi A Mathura; Tiffani Bailey Lash
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  Sasha Herbst de Cortina; Claire C Bristow; Dvora Joseph Davey; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  Point-by-Point Progress: Gonorrhea Point of Care Tests.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Johan H Melendez
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 2.  A Narrative Review of Where We Are With Point-of-Care Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Yukari C Manabe; Johan H Melendez
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.830

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.