| Literature DB >> 29914397 |
Amjad Ahmadi1,2, Rashid Ramazanzadeh3,4, Koroush Sayehmiri5, Fatemeh Sayehmiri6, Nour Amirmozafari7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premature birth is a primary cause of infant mortality and its etiology varies in different countries. Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is a common infectious agent transmitted through sexual contact. The purpose of this study is to investigate the connection between CT infections and preterm birth by meta-analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; Preterm delivery; Preterm labor
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29914397 PMCID: PMC6006861 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1868-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1The study flowchart of selected articles for final analysis
Fig. 2Prevalence of CT infections with preterm births and its 95% confidence interval using a random-effect model. Midpoint of each line segment represents the estimated prevalence in the study. Rhombic mark shows the prevalence in Total, extracted from all studies
Prevalence of CT infection with preterm delivery according to different factors
| Study NO. | Prevalencea (95% CI) | Weight % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic method | PCR | 10 | 0.06 (0.04–0.09) | 45.50 |
| Serology | 8 | 0.23 (0.10–0.35) | 27.90 | |
| Culture | 6 | 0.17 (0.10–0.24) | 26.60 | |
| Total | 24 | 0.13 (0.11–0.24) | 100 | |
| Study type | Case – control | 9 | 0.16 (0.11–0.21) | 36.67 |
| Sectional | 15 | 0.13 (0.08–0.17) | 66.33 | |
| Total | 24 | 0.13 (0.11–0.24) | 100 | |
|
| Europe | 14 | 0.13 (0.09–0.18) | 59.55 |
| Asia | 3 | 0.08 (−0.01–0.17) | 10.70 | |
| USA | 6 | 0.15 (0.08–0.22) | 20.06 | |
| Africa | 1 | 0.29 (0.23–0.34) | 3.69 | |
| Total | 24 | 0.13 (0.11–0.24) | 100 | |
| Recognize group | NO | 14 | 0.04 (0.02–0.05) | 57.08 |
| Yes | 10 | 0.26 (0.19–0.33) | 42.92 | |
| Total | 24 | 0.13 (0.11–0.24) | 100 | |
aPoint estimate and confidence interval were estimated using random effects model
Fig. 3Meta-analysis of the association of CT infections with preterm delivery risk. Odds Ratio and 95% confidence intervals for each study and in summary with weighting in a random-effect model are shown. Midpoint of each line segment represents the estimated OR in the study. Rhombic mark shows the OR in Total, extracted from all studies
Fig. 4Meta-regression of CT infections with preterm delivery prevalence with year of data collection as variable
Fig. 5Meta-regression of CT infections with preterm delivery prevalence with sample size as variable
Fig. 6Begg’s funnel plot for publication bias in the risk difference (RD) analysis. The diameter of each circle represents the weight in the meta–analysis