Literature DB >> 29912399

Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme.

Gregory G Stone1, Paul Newell2, Leanne B Gasink3, Helen Broadhurst2, Angela Wardman2, Katrina Yates2, Zhangjing Chen4, Jie Song4, Joseph W Chow3.   

Abstract

Objectives: This analysis evaluated the clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates pooled from the adult Phase III clinical trials in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Methods: Baseline isolates from five Phase III randomized controlled trials of ceftazidime/avibactam versus predominantly carbapenem comparators in patients with cIAI (RECLAIM 1 and 2; NCT01499290 and RECLAIM 3; NCT01726023), cUTI (RECAPTURE 1 and 2; NCT01595438 and NCT01599806), NP including VAP (REPROVE; NCT01808092) and cIAI or cUTI caused by ceftazidime-non-susceptible Gram-negative pathogens (REPRISE; NCT01644643) were tested for MDR status and susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenem-based comparators using CLSI broth microdilution methodology. Microbiological and clinical responses for patients with ≥1 MDR Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa isolate were assessed at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit.
Results: In the pooled microbiologically modified ITT population, 1051 patients with MDR Enterobacteriaceae and 95 patients with MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were identified. Favourable microbiological response rates at TOC for all MDR Enterobacteriaceae and MDR P. aeruginosa were 78.4% and 57.1%, respectively, for ceftazidime/avibactam and 71.6% and 53.8%, respectively, for comparators. The proportions of patients with ≥1 MDR isolate who were clinically cured at TOC were similar in the ceftazidime/avibactam (85.4%) and comparator (87.9%) arms. Conclusions: Ceftazidime/avibactam demonstrated similar clinical efficacy to predominantly carbapenem comparators against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, and may be a suitable alternative to carbapenem-based therapies for cIAI, cUTI and NP/VAP caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29912399     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  14 in total

Review 1.  Metallo-β-Lactamases: Structure, Function, Epidemiology, Treatment Options, and the Development Pipeline.

Authors:  Sara E Boyd; David M Livermore; David C Hooper; William W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Solid Organ Transplantation: Management Principles.

Authors:  Olivia Smibert; Michael J Satlin; Anoma Nellore; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.

Authors:  Dafna Yahav; Christian G Giske; Alise Grāmatniece; Henrietta Abodakpi; Vincent H Tam; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  New Drugs for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Angela Raffaella Losito; Francesca Raffaelli; Paola Del Giacomo; Mario Tumbarello
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 5.  Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew Chou; Elwyn Welch; Andrew Hunter; Barbara W Trautner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 11.431

6.  Is Ceftazidime/Avibactam an Option for Serious Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales?: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Burcu Isler; Yukiko Ezure; Jose Luis García-Fogeda Romero; Patrick Harris; Adam G Stewart; David L Paterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other agents against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care units in Taiwan: results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan in 2016.

Authors:  Chun-Hsing Liao; Na-Yao Lee; Hung-Jen Tang; Susan Shin-Jung Lee; Chin-Fu Lin; Po-Liang Lu; Jiunn-Jong Wu; Wen-Chien Ko; Wen-Sen Lee; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 8.  Current trends in the treatment of pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins; David Van Duin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-30

9.  Clinical Experience with Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections due to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Other than Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Antonio Vena; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Nadia Castaldo; Annamaria Cattelan; Cristina Mussini; Roberto Luzzati; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa; Filippo Del Puente; Claudio Maria Mastroianni; Antonio Cascio; Sergio Carbonara; Alessandro Capone; Silvia Boni; Chiara Sepulcri; Marianna Meschiari; Francesca Raumer; Alessandra Oliva; Silvia Corcione; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-09

10.  Key Takeaways From the U.S. CDC's 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Threats Report for Frontline Providers.

Authors:  Sameer S Kadri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.