Olivia Smibert1,2, Michael J Satlin3, Anoma Nellore4, Anton Y Peleg5,6. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 2. Transplant Infectious Disease and Compromised Host Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, USA. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 5. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Anton.Peleg@monash.edu. 6. Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. Anton.Peleg@monash.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as a worldwide problem. Given their degree of immunosuppression and the level of contact with the healthcare system, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at a disproportionately higher risk of acquisition, colonization, and infection with CRE, and outcomes from infection tend to be worse compared to non-transplant patients. Therapeutic options are limited for CRE infections although several newer agents have recently been approved for use. How well these agents perform in the setting of immunosuppression and SOT is unclear. We sought to review the epidemiology of CRE in SOT and the management principles. RECENT FINDINGS: CRE infections are becoming an increasing problem in SOT, and donor-derived infections present a challenge in the peri-transplant period. Newer treatments for CRE are emerging that are less toxic and potentially more effective than prior CRE-active agents, but supportive clinical data are limited. Newer beta-lactamase inhibitors have good activity against KPC carbapenemases, but they lack activity against metallo-beta-lactamases (e.g., NDM). Promising data is emerging with newer agents that have activity against most carbapenemases, but, again, clinical data is needed. Combination therapy in addition to optimal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics may go some way to improve outcomes against these difficult-to-treat organisms. Other novel therapies that prevent the emergence of resistance (oral beta-lactamase inhibitors) and eradication of resistant Gram-negative colonization (fecal microbiota transplant) may eventually become part of a bundle approach to reduce CRE infections in the future. As in non-transplant patients, CRE infections in the transplant setting are challenging to treat and prevent. Infection prevention and control remains crucial to prevent widespread dissemination, and unique challenges exist with donor-derived CRE and how best to manage recipients in the peri-transplant period. Newer treatments are now in early-phase clinical studies, and in vitro activity data are supportive for several agents providing hope for improved outcomes with these typically difficult-to-treat and highly morbid infections in transplant recipients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as a worldwide problem. Given their degree of immunosuppression and the level of contact with the healthcare system, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at a disproportionately higher risk of acquisition, colonization, and infection with CRE, and outcomes from infection tend to be worse compared to non-transplant patients. Therapeutic options are limited for CRE infections although several newer agents have recently been approved for use. How well these agents perform in the setting of immunosuppression and SOT is unclear. We sought to review the epidemiology of CRE in SOT and the management principles. RECENT FINDINGS:CRE infections are becoming an increasing problem in SOT, and donor-derived infections present a challenge in the peri-transplant period. Newer treatments for CRE are emerging that are less toxic and potentially more effective than prior CRE-active agents, but supportive clinical data are limited. Newer beta-lactamase inhibitors have good activity against KPC carbapenemases, but they lack activity against metallo-beta-lactamases (e.g., NDM). Promising data is emerging with newer agents that have activity against most carbapenemases, but, again, clinical data is needed. Combination therapy in addition to optimal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics may go some way to improve outcomes against these difficult-to-treat organisms. Other novel therapies that prevent the emergence of resistance (oral beta-lactamase inhibitors) and eradication of resistant Gram-negative colonization (fecal microbiota transplant) may eventually become part of a bundle approach to reduce CRE infections in the future. As in non-transplant patients, CRE infections in the transplant setting are challenging to treat and prevent. Infection prevention and control remains crucial to prevent widespread dissemination, and unique challenges exist with donor-derived CRE and how best to manage recipients in the peri-transplant period. Newer treatments are now in early-phase clinical studies, and in vitro activity data are supportive for several agents providing hope for improved outcomes with these typically difficult-to-treat and highly morbid infections in transplant recipients.
Authors: Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Helmi Sulaiman; Mohd-Basri Mat-Nor; Vineya Rai; Kang K Wong; Mohd S Hasan; Azrin N Abd Rahman; Janattul A Jamal; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Christine E Staatz; Jason A Roberts Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: E J Ariza-Heredia; R Patel; E A Blumberg; R C Walker; R Lewis; J Evans; A Sankar; M D Willliams; J Rogers; C Milano; R R Razonable Journal: Transpl Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Fiorella Krapp; Jennifer L Grant; Sarah H Sutton; Egon A Ozer; Viktorija O Barr Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Isabelle K Delattre; Fabio S Taccone; Frédérique Jacobs; Maya Hites; Thierry Dugernier; Herbert Spapen; Pierre-François Laterre; Pierre E Wallemacq; Françoise Van Bambeke; Paul M Tulkens Journal: Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 5.091
Authors: Jose F Camargo; Jacques Simkins; Thiago Beduschi; Akin Tekin; Laura Aragon; Armando Pérez-Cardona; Clara E Prado; Michele I Morris; Lilian M Abbo; Rafael Cantón Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Akinobu Ito; Naoki Kohira; Samuel K Bouchillon; Joshua West; Stephen Rittenhouse; Helio S Sader; Paul R Rhomberg; Ronald N Jones; Hidenori Yoshizawa; Rio Nakamura; Masakatsu Tsuji; Yoshinori Yamano Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: John P Donnelly; Jayme E Locke; Paul A MacLennan; Gerald McGwin; Roslyn B Mannon; Monika M Safford; John W Baddley; Paul Muntner; Henry E Wang Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Elena Pérez-Nadales; Mario Fernández-Ruiz; Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Álvaro Pascual; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño; Luis Martínez-Martínez; José María Aguado; Julian Torre-Cisneros Journal: Transpl Infect Dis Date: 2022-06-28