Literature DB >> 29911970

Large-scale network integration in the human brain tracks temporal fluctuations in memory encoding performance.

Ruedeerat Keerativittayayut1, Ryuta Aoki2, Mitra Taghizadeh Sarabi1, Koji Jimura2,3, Kiyoshi Nakahara1,2.   

Abstract

Although activation/deactivation of specific brain regions has been shown to be predictive of successful memory encoding, the relationship between time-varying large-scale brain networks and fluctuations of memory encoding performance remains unclear. Here, we investigated time-varying functional connectivity patterns across the human brain in periods of 30-40 s, which have recently been implicated in various cognitive functions. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants performed a memory encoding task, and their performance was assessed with a subsequent surprise memory test. A graph analysis of functional connectivity patterns revealed that increased integration of the subcortical, default-mode, salience, and visual subnetworks with other subnetworks is a hallmark of successful memory encoding. Moreover, multivariate analysis using the graph metrics of integration reliably classified the brain network states into the period of high (vs. low) memory encoding performance. Our findings suggest that a diverse set of brain systems dynamically interact to support successful memory encoding.
© 2018, Keerativittayayut et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  encoding; episodic memory; fMRI; graph analysis; human; large-scale brain networks; neuroscience; time-varying functional connectivity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29911970      PMCID: PMC6039182          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  100 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive neuroscience: forgetting of things past.

Authors:  A D Wagner; L Davachi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Default-mode activity during a passive sensory task: uncoupled from deactivation but impacting activation.

Authors:  Michael D Greicius; Vinod Menon
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.

Authors:  D J Watts; S H Strogatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network.

Authors:  Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Jay S Reidler; Jorge Sepulcre; Renee Poulin; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Neural similarity between encoding and retrieval is related to memory via hippocampal interactions.

Authors:  Maureen Ritchey; Erik A Wing; Kevin S LaBar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

Authors:  K A Paller; M Kutas; A R Mayes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10

Review 7.  Subcortical contributions to large-scale network communication.

Authors:  Peter T Bell; James M Shine
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  The hippocampus is coupled with the default network during memory retrieval but not during memory encoding.

Authors:  Willem Huijbers; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Roberto Cabeza; Sander M Daselaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantifying the reconfiguration of intrinsic networks during working memory.

Authors:  Jessica R Cohen; Courtney L Gallen; Emily G Jacobs; Taraz G Lee; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension.

Authors:  Erez Simony; Christopher J Honey; Janice Chen; Olga Lositsky; Yaara Yeshurun; Ami Wiesel; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

1.  Self-Controlled Choice Arises from Dynamic Prefrontal Signals That Enable Future Anticipation.

Authors:  Daiki Tanaka; Ryuta Aoki; Shinsuke Suzuki; Masaki Takeda; Kiyoshi Nakahara; Koji Jimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Large-scale network integration in the human brain tracks temporal fluctuations in memory encoding performance.

Authors:  Ruedeerat Keerativittayayut; Ryuta Aoki; Mitra Taghizadeh Sarabi; Koji Jimura; Kiyoshi Nakahara
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Functional coupling between frontoparietal control subnetworks bridges the default and dorsal attention networks.

Authors:  Shouhang Yin; Yilu Li; Antao Chen
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Flexible network community organization during the encoding and retrieval of spatiotemporal episodic memories.

Authors:  Amber M Schedlbauer; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  Functional Connectivity during Encoding Predicts Individual Differences in Long-Term Memory.

Authors:  Qi Lin; Kwangsun Yoo; Xilin Shen; Todd R Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Discriminating stress from rest based on resting-state connectivity of the human brain: A supervised machine learning study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Alberto Llera; Mahur M Hashemi; Reinoud Kaldewaij; Saskia B J Koch; Christian F Beckmann; Floris Klumpers; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.