Leif I Solberg1, Kris A Ohnsorg2, Emily D Parker3, Robert Ferguson4, Sanne Magnan5, Robin R Whitebird6, Claire Neely7, Emily Brandenfels8, Mark D Williams9, Mark Dreskin10, Todd Hinnenkamp11, Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss12. 1. Director for Care Improvement Research for the HealthPartners Institute in Minneapolis, MN. leif.i.solberg@healthpartners.com. 2. Project Manager for the HealthPartners Institute in Minneapolis, MN. kris.a.ohnsorg@healthpartners.com. 3. Senior Researcher at Optum in Eden Prairie, MN. emilydparker@gmail.com. 4. Director of Government Grants and Policy for the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative in Pittsburgh, PA. ferguson@jhf.org. 5. Senior Research Fellow for the HealthPartners Institute in Minneapolis, MN. sannemagnan@gmail.com. 6. Associate Professor at the University of St Thomas in St Paul, MN. rrwhitebird@stthomas.edu. 7. Chief Medical Officer for the Institute of Clinical System Improvement in Bloomington, MN. claire.neely@icsi.org. 8. Associate Medical Director of Community Health Plans in Seattle, WA. ebrandenfels@healthmanagement.com. 9. Psychiatrist at the Mayo Clinic Minnesota in Rochester. williams.mark@mayo.edu. 10. Family Medicine Physician at the Los Angeles Medical Center in CA. mark.dreskin@kp.org. 11. Ambulatory Care Nursing Supervisor at Essentia Health in Duluth, MN. todd.hinnenkamp@essentiahealth.org. 12. Principal Survey Scientist for the HealthPartners Institute in Minneapolis, MN. jeanette.y.ziegenfuss@healthpartners.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There are few proven strategies to reduce the frequency of potentially preventable hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits. To facilitate strategy development, we documented these events among complex patients and the factors that contribute to them in a large care-improvement initiative. METHODS: Observational study with retrospective audits and selective interviews by the patients' care managers among 12 diverse medical groups in California, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington that participated in an initiative to implement collaborative care for patients with both depression and either uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, or both. We reviewed information about 373 adult patients with the required conditions who belonged to these medical groups and had experienced 389 hospitalizations or ED visits during the 12-month study period from March 30, 2014, through March 29, 2015. The main outcome measures were potentially preventable hospitalizations or ED visit events. RESULTS: Of the studied events, 28% were considered to be potentially preventable (39% of ED visits and 14% of hospitalizations) and 4.6% of patients had 40% of events. Only type of insurance coverage; patient lack of resources, caretakers, or understanding of care; and inability to access clinic care were more frequent in those with potentially preventable events. Neither disease control nor ambulatory care-sensitive conditions were associated with potentially preventable events. CONCLUSION: Among these complex patients, patient characteristics, disease control, and the presence of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions were not associated with likelihood of ED visits or hospital admissions, including those considered to be potentially preventable. The current focus on using ambulatory care-sensitive conditions as a proxy for potentially preventable events needs further evaluation.
INTRODUCTION: There are few proven strategies to reduce the frequency of potentially preventable hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits. To facilitate strategy development, we documented these events among complex patients and the factors that contribute to them in a large care-improvement initiative. METHODS: Observational study with retrospective audits and selective interviews by the patients' care managers among 12 diverse medical groups in California, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington that participated in an initiative to implement collaborative care for patients with both depression and either uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, or both. We reviewed information about 373 adult patients with the required conditions who belonged to these medical groups and had experienced 389 hospitalizations or ED visits during the 12-month study period from March 30, 2014, through March 29, 2015. The main outcome measures were potentially preventable hospitalizations or ED visit events. RESULTS: Of the studied events, 28% were considered to be potentially preventable (39% of ED visits and 14% of hospitalizations) and 4.6% of patients had 40% of events. Only type of insurance coverage; patient lack of resources, caretakers, or understanding of care; and inability to access clinic care were more frequent in those with potentially preventable events. Neither disease control nor ambulatory care-sensitive conditions were associated with potentially preventable events. CONCLUSION: Among these complex patients, patient characteristics, disease control, and the presence of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions were not associated with likelihood of ED visits or hospital admissions, including those considered to be potentially preventable. The current focus on using ambulatory care-sensitive conditions as a proxy for potentially preventable events needs further evaluation.
Authors: David Banham; Tony Woollacott; John Gray; Brett Humphrys; Angel Mihnev; Robyn McDermott Journal: Aust Health Rev Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Lawrence P Casalino; Michael F Pesko; Andrew M Ryan; David J Nyweide; Theodore J Iwashyna; Xuming Sun; Jayme Mendelsohn; James Moody Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Pamela Jo Johnson; Neha Ghildayal; Andrew C Ward; Bjorn C Westgard; Lori L Boland; Jon S Hokanson Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Noushyar Panahpour Eslami; Jefferson Nguyen; Luis Navarro; Madison Douglas; Maralyssa Bann Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 2.655