Literature DB >> 1404795

Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland.

J S Weissman1, C Gatsonis, A M Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether uninsured and Medicaid patients have higher rates of avoidable hospitalizations than do insured patients.
DESIGN: We used 1987 computerized hospital discharge data to select a cross-sectional sample of hospitalized patients. Population estimates from the Current Population Survey were used to estimate rates of admission, standardized for age and sex.
SETTING: Nonfederal acute care hospitals in Massachusetts and Maryland. PATIENTS: All patients under 65 years of age who were uninsured, privately insured, or insured by Medicaid. Hospitalizations for obstetric and psychiatric conditions were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk of admission for 12 avoidable hospital conditions (AHCs) identified by a physician panel.
RESULTS: Uninsured and Medicaid patients were more likely than insured patients to be hospitalized for AHCs. Rates for uninsured patients were significantly greater than for privately insured patients in Massachusetts for 10 of 12 individual AHCs, and in Maryland for five of 12 AHCs. After adjustment for baseline utilization, the results were statistically significant for 10 of 12 AHCs in Massachusetts and seven of 12 AHCs in Maryland. For Medicaid patients, rates were significantly greater than for privately insured patients for all AHCs in each state before adjustment, and for nine of 12 and seven of 12 AHCs in each state, respectively, after adjustment for baseline utilization.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patients who are uninsured or who have Medicaid coverage have higher rates of hospitalization for conditions that can often be treated out of hospital or avoided altogether. Our approach is potentially useful for routine monitoring of access and quality of care for selected groups of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1404795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  177 in total

1.  Outcomes research and community health information systems.

Authors:  C H Slater
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Coronary artery bypass surgery: are outcomes influenced by demographics or ability to pay?

Authors:  M C Mancini; E M Cush; K Sweatman; J Dansby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes.

Authors:  A Giuffrida; H Gravelle; M Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-10

4.  A comparison of long pediatric hospitalizations in 1985 and 1994.

Authors:  A Chabra; G F Chávez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

5.  Across time and space: variations in hospital use during Canadian health reform.

Authors:  K C Carriere; L L Roos; D C Dover
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Charting the path from lack of insurance to poor health outcomes.

Authors:  D L Washington
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-07

7.  The role of public clinics in preventable hospitalizations among vulnerable populations.

Authors:  A J Epstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics.

Authors:  A D Brown; M J Goldacre; N Hicks; J T Rourke; R Y McMurtry; J D Brown; G M Anderson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

9.  Is it health care or is it health?

Authors:  P Dodek; K Chan; M Simon; R Hogg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Black-white differences in sentinel causes of death: counties in large metropolitan areas.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.