Literature DB >> 29911438

Different scoring systems to predict 6-week mortality in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients.

Fang Wang1, Shu Cui2, Fengmei Wang1, Fenghui Li1, Fei Tang1, Xu Zhang1, Yanying Gao1, Hongmin Lv1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the optimal scoring system for evaluation of 6-week bleeding-related mortality in liver cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB). Prediction effects of six scoring systems, AIMS65 score, Glasgow-Blatchford (GBS) score, full Rockall (FRS) score, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), the MELD-Na model and the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score were analyzed in this study.
METHODS: A total of 202 liver cirrhosis patients with AVB were enrolled between 1 January 2014, and 31 December 2014. All subjects were scored according to AIMS65, GBS, FRS, MELD, MELD-Na and CTP scoring systems on the first day of admission. The primary endpoint of the study was 6-week mortality. The prediction effect of these scoring systems for 6-week mortality was compared by ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: The scores of nonsurvival group evaluated by the AIMS65, GBS, FRS, MELD, MELD-Na and CTP (2.6 ± 1.1, 12.9 ± 2.7, 6.6 ± 1.8, 26.9 ± 6.5, 31.6 ± 9.3, 9.6 ± 2.2, respectively) were higher than those of the survival group (1.2 ± 1.1, 10.2 ± 3.4, 5.1 ± 1.6, 21.0 ± 6.4, 22.8 ± 8.2, 7.7 ± 2.0, respectively) (p < .01). The values of AUC and Youden index of AIMS65 and MELD-Na scoring systems [(0.808, 0.453) and (0.781, 0.516), respectively] were superior to those of MELD (0.761, 0.454), CTP (0.748, 0.399), FRS (0.738, 0.358) and GBS scoring systems (0.726, 0.370).
CONCLUSIONS: AIMS65 and MELD-Na scoring systems are recommended for evaluation of 6-week bleeding-related mortality in liver cirrhosis patients with AVB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scoring systems; cirrhosis; mortality; variceal bleeding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29911438     DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1481518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Chandnani; Pravin Rathi; Nikhil Sonthalia; Suhas Udgirkar; Shubham Jain; Qais Contractor; Samit Jain; Anupam Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-24

2.  Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gyanranjan Rout; Sanchit Sharma; Deepak Gunjan; Saurabh Kedia; Baibaswata Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-04

Review 3.  Updated strategies in the management of acute variceal haemorrhage.

Authors:  Jerome Edelson; Jessica E Basso; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.287

4.  Seasonal Impacts on the Incidence of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage: A Nationwide Analysis across a Decade.

Authors:  Mohamed Tausif Siddiqui; Mohammad Bilal; Khwaja Fahad Haq; Christopher Nabors; Beth Schorr-Lesnick; David C Wolf
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2019-12-27

5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk scores in prediction for the clinical outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding.

Authors:  Ling Yang; Rui Sun; Ning Wei; Hong Chen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.