BACKGROUND: Since there is an increasing acceptance of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and limited information regarding its effect on cardiac risk factors, we assessed lipid profiles. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records pre and post LSG was performed. Analysis of variance evaluated group differences and paired t tests compared variable changes. RESULTS: Eighty two patients (67 % female, age 46.4 ± 13.9) had presurgery lipid profiles and follow-up (43 at 1 year, 28 at 3 years, and 26 at 5 years). Groups were not different in gender distribution. The presurgery mean body mass index (BMI) was 55.7 kg/m(2); 65.9 % of the subjects were super obese. After surgery, percentage of excess BMI loss was 58.1 % year (yr) 1, 61.3 % yr 3, and 39.0 % yr 5. Lipids were within the normal ranges for all parameters at all times; however, at baseline 77 % had at least one abnormality. At 1 year, triglycerides decreased significantly from baseline (adjusted p value (adj-p) = 0.004) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) increased (adj-p = 0.025). Year 3 HDL was significantly different from baseline, adj-p = 0.0001. Yr 3 cholesterol increased from baseline, (adj-p = 0.027). Negative linear correlations with weight loss were present for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) at yr 3(r = 0.46, p = 0.02) and triglyceride change at year 5 (r = 0.48, p = 0.02). The percentage of patients with dyslipidemia or medicated did not change significantly during these 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: For this population electing LSG, mean lipid profiles were within normal ranges for all parameters before surgery. However, 77 % showed at least one abnormality presurgery. Weight change correlated with some changes of triglycerides, HDL, and LDL over time, but the impact was limited.
BACKGROUND: Since there is an increasing acceptance of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and limited information regarding its effect on cardiac risk factors, we assessed lipid profiles. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records pre and post LSG was performed. Analysis of variance evaluated group differences and paired t tests compared variable changes. RESULTS: Eighty two patients (67 % female, age 46.4 ± 13.9) had presurgery lipid profiles and follow-up (43 at 1 year, 28 at 3 years, and 26 at 5 years). Groups were not different in gender distribution. The presurgery mean body mass index (BMI) was 55.7 kg/m(2); 65.9 % of the subjects were super obese. After surgery, percentage of excess BMI loss was 58.1 % year (yr) 1, 61.3 % yr 3, and 39.0 % yr 5. Lipids were within the normal ranges for all parameters at all times; however, at baseline 77 % had at least one abnormality. At 1 year, triglycerides decreased significantly from baseline (adjusted p value (adj-p) = 0.004) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) increased (adj-p = 0.025). Year 3 HDL was significantly different from baseline, adj-p = 0.0001. Yr 3 cholesterol increased from baseline, (adj-p = 0.027). Negative linear correlations with weight loss were present for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) at yr 3(r = 0.46, p = 0.02) and triglyceride change at year 5 (r = 0.48, p = 0.02). The percentage of patients with dyslipidemia or medicated did not change significantly during these 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: For this population electing LSG, mean lipid profiles were within normal ranges for all parameters before surgery. However, 77 % showed at least one abnormality presurgery. Weight change correlated with some changes of triglycerides, HDL, and LDL over time, but the impact was limited.
Authors: Henry Buchwald; Kyle D Rudser; Stanley E Williams; Van N Michalek; James Vagasky; John E Connett Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Markku Peltonen; Peter Jacobson; C David Sjöström; Kristjan Karason; Hans Wedel; Sofie Ahlin; Åsa Anveden; Calle Bengtsson; Gerd Bergmark; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Jan Karlsson; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Hans Lönroth; Kristina Narbro; Ingmar Näslund; Torsten Olbers; Per-Arne Svensson; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D Benaiges; J A Flores-Le-Roux; J Pedro-Botet; J M Ramon; A Parri; M Villatoro; M J Carrera; M Pera; E Sagarra; L Grande; A Goday Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Alberto Benetti; Marina Del Puppo; Andrea Crosignani; Annamaria Veronelli; Enzo Masci; Francesca Frigè; Giancarlo Micheletto; Valerio Panizzo; Antonio E Pontiroli Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 19.112