Leith J Rankine1, Ziyi Wang2, Bastiaan Driehuys3, Lawrence B Marks4, Chris R Kelsey5, Shiva K Das4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: Leith_Rankine@med.unc.edu. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the degree to which lung ventilation and gas exchange are regionally correlated, using the emerging technology of hyperpolarized (HP)-129Xe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Hyperpolarized-129Xe MRI studies were performed on 17 institutional review board-approved human subjects, including 13 healthy volunteers, 1 emphysema patient, and 3 non-small cell lung cancer patients imaged before and approximately 11 weeks after radiation therapy (RT). Subjects inhaled 1 L of HP-129Xe mixture, followed by the acquisition of interleaved ventilation and gas exchange images, from which maps were obtained of the relative HP-129Xe distribution in three states: (1) gaseous, in lung airspaces; (2) dissolved interstitially, in alveolar barrier tissue; and (3) transferred to red blood cells (RBCs), in the capillary vasculature. The relative spatial distributions of HP-129Xe in airspaces (regional ventilation) and RBCs (regional gas transfer) were compared. Further, we investigated the degree to which ventilation and RBC transfer images identified similar functional regions of interest (ROIs) suitable for functionally guided RT. For the RT patients, both ventilation and RBC functional images were used to calculate differences in the lung dose-function histogram and functional effective uniform dose. RESULTS: The correlation of ventilation and RBC transfer was ρ = 0.39 ± 0.15 in healthy volunteers. For the RT patients, this correlation was ρ = 0.53 ± 0.02 before treatment and ρ = 0.39 ± 0.07 after treatment; for the emphysema patient it was ρ = 0.24. Comparing functional ROIs, ventilation and RBC transfer demonstrated poor spatial agreement: Dice similarity coefficient = 0.50 ± 0.07 and 0.26 ± 0.12 for the highest-33%- and highest-10%-function ROIs in healthy volunteers, and in RT patients (before treatment) these were 0.58 ± 0.04 and 0.40 ± 0.04. The average magnitude of the differences between RBC- and ventilation-derived functional effective uniform dose, fV20Gy, fV10Gy, and fV5Gy were 1.5 ± 1.4 Gy, 4.1% ± 3.8%, 5.0% ± 3.8%, and 5.3% ± 3.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ventilation may not be an effective surrogate for true regional lung function for all patients.
PURPOSE: To investigate the degree to which lung ventilation and gas exchange are regionally correlated, using the emerging technology of hyperpolarized (HP)-129Xe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Hyperpolarized-129Xe MRI studies were performed on 17 institutional review board-approved human subjects, including 13 healthy volunteers, 1 emphysemapatient, and 3 non-small cell lung cancerpatients imaged before and approximately 11 weeks after radiation therapy (RT). Subjects inhaled 1 L of HP-129Xe mixture, followed by the acquisition of interleaved ventilation and gas exchange images, from which maps were obtained of the relative HP-129Xe distribution in three states: (1) gaseous, in lung airspaces; (2) dissolved interstitially, in alveolar barrier tissue; and (3) transferred to red blood cells (RBCs), in the capillary vasculature. The relative spatial distributions of HP-129Xe in airspaces (regional ventilation) and RBCs (regional gas transfer) were compared. Further, we investigated the degree to which ventilation and RBC transfer images identified similar functional regions of interest (ROIs) suitable for functionally guided RT. For the RT patients, both ventilation and RBC functional images were used to calculate differences in the lung dose-function histogram and functional effective uniform dose. RESULTS: The correlation of ventilation and RBC transfer was ρ = 0.39 ± 0.15 in healthy volunteers. For the RT patients, this correlation was ρ = 0.53 ± 0.02 before treatment and ρ = 0.39 ± 0.07 after treatment; for the emphysemapatient it was ρ = 0.24. Comparing functional ROIs, ventilation and RBC transfer demonstrated poor spatial agreement: Dice similarity coefficient = 0.50 ± 0.07 and 0.26 ± 0.12 for the highest-33%- and highest-10%-function ROIs in healthy volunteers, and in RT patients (before treatment) these were 0.58 ± 0.04 and 0.40 ± 0.04. The average magnitude of the differences between RBC- and ventilation-derived functional effective uniform dose, fV20Gy, fV10Gy, and fV5Gy were 1.5 ± 1.4 Gy, 4.1% ± 3.8%, 5.0% ± 3.8%, and 5.3% ± 3.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ventilation may not be an effective surrogate for true regional lung function for all patients.
Authors: John Kipritidis; Bilal A Tahir; Guillaume Cazoulat; Michael S Hofman; Shankar Siva; Jason Callahan; Nicholas Hardcastle; Tokihiro Yamamoto; Gary E Christensen; Joseph M Reinhardt; Noriyuki Kadoya; Taylor J Patton; Sarah E Gerard; Isabella Duarte; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Mikel Byrne; Rick Sims; Scott Ramsay; Jeremy T Booth; Enid Eslick; Fiona Hegi-Johnson; Henry C Woodruff; Rob H Ireland; Jim M Wild; Jing Cai; John E Bayouth; Kristy Brock; Paul J Keall Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Kai Ruppert; Faraz Amzajerdian; Yi Xin; Hooman Hamedani; Luis Loza; Tahmina Achekzai; Ian F Duncan; Harrilla Profka; Yiwen Qian; Mehrdad Pourfathi; Stephen Kadlecek; Rahim R Rizi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Esther M Vicente; Arezoo Modiri; John Kipritidis; Kun-Chang Yu; Kai Sun; Jochen Cammin; Arun Gopal; Jingzhu Xu; Sina Mossahebi; Aaron Hagan; Yulong Yan; Daniel Rockwell Owen; Pranshu Mohindra; Martha M Matuszak; Robert D Timmerman; Amit Sawant Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Kai Ruppert; Yi Xin; Hooman Hamedani; Faraz Amzajerdian; Luis Loza; Tahmina Achekzai; Ian F Duncan; Harrilla Profka; Sarmad Siddiqui; Mehrdad Pourfathi; Federico Sertic; Maurizio F Cereda; Stephen Kadlecek; Rahim R Rizi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Leith J Rankine; Ziyi Wang; Chris R Kelsey; Elianna Bier; Bastiaan Driehuys; Lawrence B Marks; Shiva K Das Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 7.038