| Literature DB >> 29907142 |
Hao Liu1,2, Wang He1,2, Bo Wang1,2, Kewei Xu1,2, Jinli Han1,2, Junjiong Zheng1,2, Jun Ren3, Lin Shao3, Shiping Bo3, Sijia Lu4, Tianxin Lin5,6, Jian Huang7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for bladder cancer detection is cystoscopy, which is an invasive procedure that causes discomfort in patients. The currently available non-invasive approaches either show limited sensitivity in low-grade tumours or possess unsatisfying specificity. The aim of the present study is to develop a new non-invasive strategy based on chromosomal imbalance levels to detect bladder cancer effectively.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder Cancer; CNV; Chromosomal imbalance analysis; MALBAC; NGS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29907142 PMCID: PMC6003132 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4571-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants
| Training Group | Validation Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | UD | NC | BC | UD | NC | |
| Total No. | 74 | 23 | 51 | 120 | 15 | 45 |
| No. gender (%) | ||||||
| Female | 7 (9.5) | 8 (34.8) | 15 (29.4) | 21(17.5) | 5(33.3) | 9 (20) |
| Male | 67 (90.5) | 15 (65.2) | 36 (70.6) | 99(82.5) | 10(66.7) | 36 (80) |
| Median age (range) | 62 (28–90) | 56 (18–72) | 41 (23–69) | 62(33–93) | 54(22–73) | 40(21–66) |
| Primary (%) | 61 (82.4) | – | – | 106(88.3) | – | – |
| Recurrent (%) | 13 (17.6) | – | – | 14(11.7) | – | – |
| No. tumour stage (%) | ||||||
| Tis | 1 (1.4) | – | – | 2(1.7) | – | – |
| Ta | 23 (31.1) | 34(28.3) | ||||
| T1 | 24 (32.4) | 61(50.8) | ||||
| T2 | 16 (21.6) | 13(10.8) | ||||
| T3 | 5 (6.8) | 10(8.3) | ||||
| NA | 5 (6.8) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| No. tumour grade (%) | ||||||
| PUNLMP | 5(6.8) | – | – | 0(0.0) | – | – |
| LG | 9(12.2) | 33(27.5) | ||||
| HG | 59 (79.7) | 83(69.2) | ||||
| NA | 1 (1.4) | 4(3.3) | ||||
BC bladder cancer patients, UD non-malignant urinary disease patients, NC healthy participants
Fig. 1ROC curve analysis for urine CIA scores. To determine the best cut-off value that discriminated between malignant BC patients and control groups, urine CIA scores from 71 BC, 23 UD and 51 healthy participants were included. The cut-off was defined as 24 [Accuracy = 89.0%, sensitivity = 83.1%, specificity = 94.5%, NPV = 85.4% and PPV = 93.7%]. Area under the curve (AUC) =0.917, 95%CI =0.868–0.966, P < 0.001
Fig. 2The distribution of CIA scores. a CIA scores in tumour tissues from bladder cancer patients (BC-t), urine of BC patients (BC-u), urine of BC patients with paired CIA positive tumour tissues (BC-u (t+)), urine of non-malignant urinary disease patients (UD-u) and healthy controls (NC-u); b Tumour tissue CIA scores in different stages and grades; c Urine CIA scores in different stages and grades. The cut-off for positive CIA definition was set to 24. The P value was calculated from Fisher’s Exact Test
Fig. 3The demonstration of chromosomal CNV patterns in BC patients. The CNV profiles in tumour tissue and paired urine samples for patients No. 22, No. 27 and No. 28 (See Additional file 2: Table S1) are shown
Concordance of CIA evaluation between tumour tissues and urine samples. (N = 54)
| CIA in urine | CIA in tissue | Total (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (%) | Positive (%) | ||
| Negative (%) | 3 (5.6%) | 5 (9.3%) | 8 (14.8%) |
| Positive (%) | 2 (3.7%) | 44 (81.5%) | 46 (85.2%) |
| Total (%) | 5 (9.3%) | 49 (90.7%) | 54 (100%) |
| Concordance (%) | 87.0% | ||
| Kappa | 0.392, | ||
| McNemar Test | |||
The performance of the urine CIA score in training group to distinguish BC patients in different TNM stages and histology grades
| BC patients | No. of (Case/Control) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 71/74 | 83.1% | 94.5% | 89.0% |
| Tis + Ta + T1 | 47/74 | 83.0% | 94.5% | 90.1% |
| T2 + T3 | 19/74 | 94.7% | 94.5% | 94.6% |
| PUNLMP | 5/74 | 60% | 94.5% | 92.4% |
| LG | 9/74 | 88.9% | 94.5% | 94.0% |
| HG | 55/74 | 83.9% | 94.5% | 90.0% |
| With CIA+ Tissues | 49/74 | 89.8% | 94.5% | 92.7% |
| Ta + T1 | 34/74 | 88.2% | 94.5% | 92.6% |
| T2 + T3 | 14/74 | 100% | 94.5% | 95.5% |
| PUNLMP | 1/74 | 0% | 94.5% | 93.3% |
| LG | 8/74 | 87.5% | 94.5% | 93.9% |
| HG | 40/74 | 92.5% | 94.5% | 93.9% |
The comparison of the CIA results with voided urine cytology in BC patients
| Urine CIA | Cytology | Total (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (%) | Positive (%) | ||
| Negative (%) | 6 (10.9%) | 5 (9.1%) | 11 (20.0%) |
| Positive (%) | 20 (36.4%) | 24 (43.6%) | 44 (80.0%) |
| Total (%) | 26 (47.3%) | 29 (52.7%) | 55 (100%) |
| McNemar Test | |||
The original cytology results included negative, suspicious positive and positive. The results of suspicious positive and positive were regarded as positive in this comparison
The validation of the urine CIA score to distinguish BC patients
| BC patients | No. of (Case/Control) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 120/60 | 89.2% | 90.0% | 89.4% |
| Tis + Ta | 36/60 | 83.3% | 90.0% | 87.5% |
| T1 | 61/60 | 88.5% | 90.0% | 89.3% |
| T2 + T3 | 23/60 | 100.0% | 90.0% | 92.8% |
| LG | 33/60 | 84.8% | 90.0% | 88.2% |
| HG | 83/60 | 90.4% | 90.0% | 90.2% |