Literature DB >> 29906317

Essential considerations in developing attention control groups in behavioral research.

Dawn M Aycock1, Matthew J Hayat1,2, Ashley Helvig1, Sandra B Dunbar3, Patricia C Clark1.   

Abstract

Attention control groups strengthen randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions, but researchers need to give careful consideration to the attention control activities. A comparative effectiveness research framework provides an ideal opportunity for an attention control group as a supplement to standard care, so participants potentially receive benefit regardless of group assignment. The anticipated benefit of the control condition must be independent of the study outcome. Resources needed for attention control activities need to be carefully considered and ethical considerations carefully weighed. In this paper we address nine considerations for the design and implementation of attention control groups: (1) ensure attention control activities are not associated with the outcome; (2) avoid contamination of the intervention or control group; (3) design comparable control and intervention activities; (4) ensure researcher training to adequately administer both treatment arms; (5) design control activities to be interesting and acceptable to participants; (6) evaluate attention control activities; (7) consider additional resources needed to implement attention control activities; (8) quantifying the effects of attention control and intervention groups; and (9) ethical considerations with attention control groups. Examples from the literature and ongoing research are presented. Careful planning for the attention control group is as important as for the intervention group. Researchers can use the considerations presented here to assist in planning for the best attention control group for their study.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention control; comparative effectiveness research; randomized control trial; research design

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29906317     DOI: 10.1002/nur.21870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  19 in total

Review 1.  Can the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Improve the Delivery of Person-Centered Diabetes Care? A Review of Recent Developments and a Case Study.

Authors:  Soren E Skovlund; T H Lichtenberg; D Hessler; N Ejskjaer
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Attention control group activities and perceived benefit in a trial of a behavioral intervention for older adults.

Authors:  Sarah E LaFave; Marianne Granbom; Thomas K M Cudjoe; Alex Gottsch; Gerard Shorb; Sarah L Szanton
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Improving family caregiver and patient outcomes in lung cancer surgery: Study protocol for a randomized trial of the multimedia self-management (MSM) intervention.

Authors:  Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Nora Ruel; Jacqueline Carranza; Rosemary Prieto; Betty Ferrell; Robert S Krouse; Ruth McCorkle; Jae Y Kim
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Motivational interviewing to promote interconception health: A scoping review of evidence from clinical trials.

Authors:  Emily F Gregory; Adya I Maddox; Lisa D Levine; Alexander G Fiks; Scott A Lorch; Kenneth Resnicow
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Attention control in a trial of an online psychoeducational intervention for caregivers.

Authors:  Mariya Kovaleva; Joe R Nocera; Kenneth Hepburn; Melinda Higgins; Rachel Nash; Fayron Epps; Glenna Brewster; Elizabeth Bilsborough; Amy A Blumling; Patricia C Griffiths
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  A Systematic Review of Biological Mechanisms and Chronic Pain Outcomes During Stress Reduction Interventions.

Authors:  Katherine M Bernier Carney; Erin E Young; Jessica W Guite; Angela R Starkweather
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.522

7.  Fidelity of a peer-led asthma self-management intervention and its attention control in a multisite study of urban adolescents.

Authors:  Hyekyun Rhee; Annette Grape; Laurene Tumiel-Berhalter; Mona Wicks; Elizabeth Sloand; Arlene Butz
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT).

Authors:  Tessy Boedt; Eline Dancet; Sharon Lie Fong; Karen Peeraer; Diane De Neubourg; Sofie Pelckmans; Arne van de Vijver; Jan Seghers; Katleen Van der Gucht; Ben Van Calster; Carl Spiessens; Christophe Matthys
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing Council Science in Review.

Authors:  Kathryn A Wood; Gayenell S Magwood; Holli A DeVon
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Pilot Study of a Multilevel Mobile Health App for Substance Use, Sexual Risk Behaviors, and Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV Among Youth: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  David Cordova; Jaime Munoz-Velazquez; Frania Mendoza Lua; Kathryn Fessler; Sydni Warner; Jorge Delva; Nicole Adelman; Angela Fernandez; Jose Bauermeister
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.