A new Passerini-type reaction in which hexafluoroisopropanol functions as the acid component is reported. The reaction tolerates a broad range of isocyanides and aldehydes, and the formed imidates can be reduced toward β-amino alcohols under mild and metal-free conditions. In addition, the imidate products were shown to undergo an unprecedented retro-Passerini-type reaction under microwave conditions, providing valuable mechanistic information about the Passerini reaction and its variations.
A new Passerini-type reaction in which hexafluoroisopropanol functions as the acid component is reported. The reaction tolerates a broad range of isocyanides and aldehydes, and the formed imidates can be reduced toward β-amino alcohols under mild and metal-free conditions. In addition, the imidate products were shown to undergo an unprecedented retro-Passerini-type reaction under microwave conditions, providing valuable mechanistic information about the Passerini reaction and its variations.
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs)
are widely recognized as important tools to create high molecular
diversity and complexity in an efficient manner.[1] MCRs combine three or more reactants in a single operation
to afford products that contain essentially all of the atoms of the
starting materials. Within this field, isocyanide-based multicomponent
reactions (IMCRs) have claimed a dominant position as a result of
the ambiphilic character of the isocyanide functionality.[2] In 1921, Passerini discovered the first IMCR,
i.e., the reaction between isocyanides, aldehydes, and carboxylic
acids to give α-acyloxy carboxamides.[3] Forty years later, Ugi cleverly expanded this methodology by simply
including an amine, thereby creating a four-component reaction affording
peptoid scaffolds.[4]Even though the
discovery of both the Passerini and Ugi reaction
dates back more than half a century, current research continues to
provide new applications and new variations of these flexible reactions.[5] Next to postcondensation modifications of traditional
Passerini and Ugi products, strategies for the development of MCR
variations can be based on single reactant replacement (SRR) or diverting
or interrupting the usual reaction pathway.[6] For IMCRs, the latter mainly involves the reactivity of the nitrilium
ion intermediate.We recently showed that in the interrupted
Ugi (or Passerini) reaction
of tryptamine-derived isocyanides, the nitrilium ion could be intercepted
by the nucleophilic C3 position of the indole moiety, generating highly
congested, sp3-rich polycylic indolines 4–6 (Scheme A).[7] An important feature of this method
was the use of the fluorinated protic solvents 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
(TFE) and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). The strong hydrogen
bond-donating properties and low nucleophilicity of these solvents
proved ideal for activation of the imine and stabilization of the
nitrilium ion.[8] In continuation of our
work in this area, we aimed to expand this concept to other electron-rich
arenes in Passerini- and Ugi-type reactions. When the reaction of
3,4-dimethoxyphenethyl isocyanide (1b) and pivaldehyde
(2a) was performed in HFIP as the solvent, intermolecular
HFIP addition (to give 8a) surprisingly outcompeted the
Bischler–Napieralski cyclization (leading to 7) despite the nucleophilic character of the 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl moiety
(Scheme B).[9,10] This serendipitous result prompted us to further investigate this
Passerini-type reaction.
Scheme 1
Novel Passerini-Type Reactions
Replacing the carboxylic acid
in the Passerini reaction by other
acid components has been previously demonstrated by several groups.[11] However, these reactions typically involve an
irreversible Mumm- or Smiles-type rearrangement after the imidate
formation, generating a thermodynamically favored amide product. Alternative
acid components include electron-deficient (hetero)aromatic alcohols.[5b] Given its comparable pKA, (9.3 vs ∼7–9 for phenol derivatives), HFIP
plausibly undergoes a similar addition to the nitrilium ion, which
produces a stable imidate 8 that cannot undergo a Mumm-type
rearrangement.[12] As these imidates could
be considered chemical equivalents of the nitrilium ion synthon, we
decided to further investigate this reaction.We began our optimization
with n-pentyl isocyanide
(1c) and propionaldehyde (2b) as the benchmark
substrates (Table ). To our surprise, no product formation could be observed by 1H NMR after subjecting the reactants to the initial conditions
(entries 1 and 2). We reasoned that HFIP might be too acidic as a
solvent, leading to decomposition of the isocyanide and/or the imidate
product rather than activation of the aldehyde. When we switched to
CH2Cl2 as the solvent with a moderate excess
of HFIP (3 equiv), the desired product 8b was obtained
in 58% yield after 20 h and only 37% after 66 h (entry 4), supporting
our hypothesis. We then started monitoring conversion over time by 1H NMR analysis. This experiment revealed that our reaction
reached its optimal yield after only 1 h. Although the isocyanide
was not completely consumed after 1 h (entry 5), longer reaction times
led to lower yields (based on internal standard), most likely as a
result of product decomposition. Increasing the stoichiometry of HFIP
(entry 6) or the temperature (entry 7) did not lead to improved yields.
To evaluate the chemoselectivity of the reaction, we conducted a competition
experiment between HFIP and acetic acid, which led to quantitative
conversion to the classical Passerini product 9 within
1 h (entry 8).
Table 1
Optimization of Passerini-Type Reactiona
entry
temp (°C)
[1c] (M)
solvent
time (h)
HFIP (equiv)
yieldb (%)
8b/9
1
rt
0.1
HFIP
20
0
2
rt
1
HFIP
20
0
3
rt
1
CHCl3
20
3
0
4
rt
1
CH2Cl2
20
3
58
100:0
5
rt
1
CH2Cl2
1
3
82
100:0
6
rt
1
CH2Cl2
1
10
82
100:0
7
40
1
CH2Cl2
1
3
62
100:0
8c
rt
1
CH2Cl2
1
3
>99
0:100
Standard conditions:
propionaldehyde
(0.65 mmol), n-pentyl isocyanide (0.5 mmol), and
HFIP in solvent, stirred at the indicated temperature and time.
Based on NMR analysis with 2,5-dimethylfuran
as internal standard.
With
1.2 equiv of AcOH.
Standard conditions:
propionaldehyde
(0.65 mmol), n-pentyl isocyanide (0.5 mmol), and
HFIP in solvent, stirred at the indicated temperature and time.Based on NMR analysis with 2,5-dimethylfuran
as internal standard.With
1.2 equiv of AcOH.Having
optimized the conditions, we moved our focus toward the
scope of this reaction. We were pleased to see that all isocyanides
were efficiently converted to the Passerini-type product (Scheme ), with the exception
of tert-butyl isocyanide. When the reaction was performed
in CD2Cl2 and monitored by 1H NMR
analysis, competition between product formation and decomposition
was observed. Imidates derived from tBuNC are relatively
basic, leading to increased decomposition via the protonated imidate.[13] Another interesting observation is the relation
between isocyanide nucleophilicity and product stability. Less nucleophilic
isocyanides needed 6 h to reach maximal yields; however, these products
showed less decomposition over time. This can be explained by their
lower basicity, making degradation pathways less favorable. As for
the aldehyde scope, aliphatic aldehydes underwent isocyanide addition
effectively, though less reactive aromatic aldehydes and ketones proved
to be beyond the scope of this method. Only the relatively reactive p-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde reacted to give the product
(8h), albeit in HFIP as the solvent with 144 h of reaction
time.
Scheme 2
Scope of the Passerini-Type Reaction,
Standard conditions: isocyanide
(1 mmol), aldehyde (1.3 mmol), HFIP (3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 M), rt.
Isolated
yields.
HFIP (0.1 M) was
used as the solvent.
Scope of the Passerini-Type Reaction,
Standard conditions: isocyanide
(1 mmol), aldehyde (1.3 mmol), HFIP (3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 M), rt.Isolated
yields.HFIP (0.1 M) was
used as the solvent.Having established the
limitations of this novel Passerini-type
reaction, we investigated the possibility to further diversify these
products. Given our earlier experience in Passerini/reduction sequences
to valuable β-amino alcohols, we aimed to achieve a similar
procedure.[14] We started this endeavor with
aromatic imidate 8i, given its comparably low electrophilicity.
After some optimization of the reaction conditions, we found that
treatment with BH3·NH3 (3 equiv) and TFA
(5 equiv) in HFIP gave the highest yield (for details, see the Supporting Information). Due to the higher basicity
of imidates derived from aliphatic isocyanides, addition of TFA was
not necessary to activate the imidate in these cases.[15] Pleasingly, the two steps could be combined in a one-pot
sequence given the compatible conditions.A broad range of isocyanides
and aliphatic aldehydes were screened
in this Passerini/reduction method (Scheme ). Moderate to excellent yields of amino
alcohols 10a–k could be obtained
using aromatic isocyanides. Even α-heterosubstituted and highly
electrophilic aldehydes smoothly reacted to give the desired product.
Surprisingly, even chloroacetaldehyde, a usually problematic reactant
in Passerini-type reactions, was converted to the corresponding amino
alcohol 10j, albeit in only 17% yield. Aliphatic isocyanides
also exhibited clean conversion, however, the resulting products 10l–o were generally obtained in slightly
lower yields. This can be attributed to the lower stability of these
imidates in HFIP, leading to competition between β-amino alcohol
formation and imidate decomposition. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy
that these reactions generally gave higher isolated yields in this
one-pot, two-stage sequence compared to the corresponding imidate
synthesis alone (cf. imidate 8b and β-amino alcohol 10l). This can again be rationalized by the stability issues
of these imidates.
Scheme 3
Scope of the One-Pot β-Amino Alcohol Synthesis,
Standard conditions: isocyanide
(1 mmol), aldehyde (1.3 mmol), HFIP (3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 M), rt, next diluted with HFIP (0.1 M), then BH3·NH3 (3 mmol) and TFA (5 mmol).
Isolated yields.
No TFA.
Scope of the One-Pot β-Amino Alcohol Synthesis,
Standard conditions: isocyanide
(1 mmol), aldehyde (1.3 mmol), HFIP (3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 M), rt, next diluted with HFIP (0.1 M), then BH3·NH3 (3 mmol) and TFA (5 mmol).Isolated yields.No TFA.As the β-amino
alcohol moiety is a structural motif frequently
appearing in APIs, we sought to apply the developed methodology in
the synthesis of representative pharmaceuticals. This was successfully
achieved with the synthesis of propranolol (10p) and
(±)-rivaroxaban (12, Scheme ). Propranolol, a β blocker used in
the treatment of heart disease,[16] was readily
accessible by reaction of (1-naphthyloxy)acetaldehyde (2c) and isopropyl isocyanide (74% yield). The reductive Passerini-type
reaction of 1e (readily accessible from commercial 11) and (Cbz-amino)acetaldehyde smoothly afforded 10q, which was further converted to (±)-rivaroxaban (12) in three straightforward steps. These applications highlight the
robustness of this Passerini/reduction method, which is a mild extension
of our earlier work.[14]
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Propranolol
and (±)-Rivaroxaban
We then shifted our attention back to our initial attempt
to synthesize
3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 7. Given the potential electrophilicity
of imidates, and with the Bischler–Napieralski reaction in
mind, we considered the possibility of converting imidate 8a to dihydroisoquinoline 7. Unfortunately, treatment
with Brønsted or Lewis acids only led to decomposition or imidate
hydrolysis. However, when we subjected 8a to microwave
irradiation (200 °C, 10 min) under neutral conditions, we surprisingly
observed full conversion back to isocyanide 1b. In toluene-d8 under the same conditions, using 2,6-dimethylfuran
as an internal standard, we could clearly observe reformation of all
the reactants of the initial Passerini-type reaction (1b, 2a, and HFIP) by 1H NMR analysis. We were
intrigued by the unprecedented reversibility of this Passerini-type
reaction, not in the least because computational studies have shown
that imidate formation is highly exothermic in both Passerini and
Ugi reactions.[17] To evaluate the generality
of this retro-Passerini reaction, we selected a small set of imidates
(8c,d,f–h) and subjected them to microwave irradiation (200 °C) in 10
min cycles to determine the conversion over time (Table ).[18] As anticipated, imidate 8c also showed near complete
conversion (83%). Interestingly, aromatic R1 as well as
R2 substituents led to considerably slower retro-Passerini
reaction. Although full conversion was not reached, a clear trend
in reaction rate could be observed between these imidates. Retro-Passerini
reaction of imidates 8g and 8h showed clear
first order kinetics, as expected for a unimolecular process. The
retro-reaction of imidate 8d reached a steady state after
40 min, possibly reflecting a thermodynamic equilibrium under these
conditions. After the samples were allowed to sit for 2 weeks at room
temperature, all of the crude mixtures were reconverted to the corresponding
imidates 8, with the exception of 8d and 8h.
Table 2
Reversible Passerini-Type Reactiona
compd
time (min)
convb (%)
compd
time (min)
convb (%)
8c
10
83
8g
240
84
8d
90
67
8h
270
77
8f
60
65
Standard conditions: 8 (0.1 mmol) in toluene-d8 (0.1
M) under
microwave irradiation in 10 min cycles at 200 °C.
Monitored by 1H NMR analysis
with 2,5-dimethylfuran as internal standard.
Standard conditions: 8 (0.1 mmol) in toluene-d8 (0.1
M) under
microwave irradiation in 10 min cycles at 200 °C.Monitored by 1H NMR analysis
with 2,5-dimethylfuran as internal standard.Theoretical studies have already provided some insight
in the conventional
Passerini reaction, mainly focusing on the involvement of a nitrilium
ion intermediate. Morokuma et al. proposed a mechanism including this
nitrilium intermediate.[17c] Our results
on this retro-Passerini-type reaction, however, rather suggest a more
concerted mechanism, considering the electrophilicity of the nitrilium
ion and its resulting propensity to undergo Bischler–Napieralski-type
cyclizations.[9,19] The formation of a nitrilium
ion suggests that fragmentation of the C–CN+R bond
would outcompete nucleophilic addition of electron-rich arenes (as
in imidates 8f and 8a). Since the resulting
Bischler–Napieralski product is not detected (not even in trace
amounts) we believe that a concerted mechanism is more likely in both
the forward Passerini-type reaction and the reverse reaction (Scheme ). The effect of
the conditions on the directionality of the reaction can be rationalized
by thermodynamic considerations. As ΔG = ΔH – TΔS,
the enthalpic factor dominates the outcome of the reaction at room
temperature, while at 200 °C the entropic factor becomes more
important, favoring the reverse reaction.
Scheme 5
Concerted Mechanism
of the Passerini Reaction
In conclusion, we report a Passerini-type reaction toward
α-hydroxy
imidates with HFIP as a novel acid component. By combining this procedure
in one pot with a subsequent reduction step, we efficiently synthesized
a series of β-amino alcohols. The scope of this procedure proved
to be complementary to our previous Passerini/reduction strategy.[14] In addition, the utility of this mild transformation
was demonstrated by the synthesis of the two APIs, propranolol and
(±)-rivaroxaban. Finally, we showed these α-hydroxy imidates
undergo an unprecedented retro-Passerini-type reaction under microwave
irradiation. This observation provides new insight into the Passerini
reaction and contributes to a better mechanistic understanding of
isocyanide chemistry in general.
Authors: Shabnam Shaabani; Ruixue Xu; Maryam Ahmadianmoghaddam; Li Gao; Martin Stahorsky; Joe Olechno; Richard Ellson; Michael Kossenjans; Victoria Helan; Alexander Dömling Journal: Green Chem Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 10.182