| Literature DB >> 29904818 |
Sibel Isal1,2, Julien Pierson2, Laetitia Imbert1,2,3, Alexandra Clement2, Charlotte Collet2,3, Sophie Pinel4, Nicolas Veran1,2, Aurélie Reinhard2, Sylvain Poussier2,3, Guillaume Gauchotte5,6, Steeven Frezier2, Gilles Karcher1,2, Pierre-Yves Marie1,2,7, Fatiha Maskali8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tracers triggering αvβ3 integrins, such as certain RGD-containing peptides, were found promising in previous pilot studies characterizing high-grade gliomas. However, only limited comparisons have been performed with current PET tracers. This study aimed at comparing the biodistribution of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) with that of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD, an easily synthesized monomeric RGD compound with rapid kinetics, in two different rodent models of engrafted human glioblastoma.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG; 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD; Glioblastoma; PET; αvβ3 integrin
Year: 2018 PMID: 29904818 PMCID: PMC6003898 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0405-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1Time-activity-curves derived from the 120-min PET recordings following the intravenous injection of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD (a) or 18F-FDG (b) (n = 17 for both tracers) and expressed after logarithmic transformation of the mean ± SEM values for the SUVmean from the kidneys (black crosses), tumor (black triangles), heart (black circles), brain (white circles), and liver (white squares)
Fig. 2Results of blocking experiments performed in five xenograft mice: a with SUVmean values obtained at the 2nd hour of PET recording for tumors and various organs, after the injection of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD (black hatched bar), as compared with the co-injection of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD with excess unlabeled RGD (gray bars) and b with examples of superimposed Maximal Intensity Pixel images obtained in the same animal with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD alone (left image of mice) and with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD co-injected with unlabeled RGD (right image of mice). The two tumors are indicated with white arrows and the color scale is expressed in SUV values. *p < 0.05 for paired comparisons
Fig. 3Comparison of tumor-to-organ ratios for activities measured during the 2nd hour with PET recording (a) and gamma counter (b) between 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD and 18F-FDG in 17 xenograft mice (**p < 0.001 for 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD vs. 18F-FDG)
Fig. 4Example of superimposed Maximal Intensity Pixel images corresponding to the 2nd hour of PET recording and obtained in the same xenograft mouse with 18F-FDG (left panel) and with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD (right panel). The two tumors are indicated with white arrows, and the color scale is expressed in SUV values
Fig. 5Example of magnetic resonance images and PET images obtained with 18F-FDG and with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD in a rat brain with an engrafted glioblastoma tumor (white arrows)
Fig. 6Representative examples of ex vivo images obtained from the same glioblastoma tumor extracted from a nude mouse after sacrifice showing (1) the distribution of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD recorded by the μImager™ and (2) with several immunohistochemical staining applied on contiguous slices for a morphological analysis (hematoxylin-eosin) and for analyzing the expressions of the αv subunit and the Ki-67 protein (an indicator of cell proliferation). Note that the expressions of the αv subunit (third panel c2 bottom) and of the Ki-67 (last panel bottom d2 right) protein appear much higher in a selected area showing a high level of recorded 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD counts on the μImager™ (15.240 counts-per-minute, images from the lower third of the figure; first panel bottom left), when compared with another area showing a low level of recorded counts (9.878 counts-per-minute, images from the middle third of the figure; first panel middle). By contrast, cell density appears equivalent in these two areas (second panel b1 and b2 middle and bottom) on the hematoxylin-eosin stained images