Literature DB >> 29904401

Analysis on the association between sperm DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters, blood microelements and seminal plasma ROS in male patients with infertility.

Deng'e Xie1, Chen Lu2, Ying Zhu3, Sulan Zhu4, Er-Jiang Yang1, Xin Jin5.   

Abstract

We conducted this study to analyze the sperm DNA fragmentation index, conventional semen parameters, blood microelements and seminal plasma reactive oxygen species (ROS) in patients with male infertility to determine the association between each of the above male physiological parameters and DNA fragmentation index and infertility. Eighty cases of infertile males and 20 cases of normal males with children were divided into the infertility and control groups, respectively. Sperm DNA fragmentation index, conventional semen parameters, serum microelement content and seminal plasma ROS levels were detected, and the existing correlation between sperm DNA fragmentation index and the various physiological parameters were studied. The sperm DNA fragmentation index had no correlation with conventional sperm parameters. Our results demonstrated that zinc, lead and magnesium ions in the serum microelements were correlated with sperm DNA fragmentation (p<0.05). Upon an increase in zinc and lead serum concentration, there was a subsequent increase in sperm DNA fragmentation (p=0.008). Furthermore, when magnesium ion increased, it also caused an increase in sperm DNA fragmentation (p<0.05). The seminal plasma ROS of infertile males was higher than that of males with children (p<0.05). Our results suggest that sperm DNA fragmentation index is closely associated with the infertility rate and microelements of serum and seminal plasma ROS can impact the formation of sperm DNA fragmentation. Therefore, the sperm DNA fragmentation index can serve as an important parameter to assess male infertility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  male infertility; microelements; seminal plasma ROS; sperm DNA fragmentation

Year:  2018        PMID: 29904401      PMCID: PMC5996710          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Over the last decade, there has been continuous development of social productive forces as well as deterioration of the environment. At the same time, living standards have shown improvement, resulting in increased attention being given to infertility, with diagnostic rates showing a notable increase (1). Correlational studies have shown that the reasons of infertility are complex. In an infertile couple, approximately 40% of the time both the male and female have an infertility issue, approximately 25% of the time the issue is due to either the male or the female, or approximately 35% of the time, the issue is unknown (2). Currently, there is a lack of methods to diagnose male infertility in clinic. One of the most direct and most certain methods to diagnose males with infertility is to analyze azoospermatism in clinic. In clinic, certain defects and shortages exist in the basic assessment of male fertility by analyzing sperm density and motility in routine sperm examination, as the assessment on male fertility is not only limited to the above indices (3,4). Currently, scientists have been studying the correlation between sperm DNA damage and male infertility. Correlational studies have reported that there is a great difference in sperm DNA fragmentation indexes among the different infertile patients, but total results indicate that sperm motility of a mass of infertile patients presents an obvious negative correlation with their sperm DNA fragmentation indexes (5,6). This negative correlation shows that sperm DNA damage is one of the important factors causing sperm motility decrease and male infertility (5). By studying the correlation between infertile male sperm DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters, blood microelements and seminal plasma reactive oxygen species (ROS), the present study may provide a theoretical basis for diagnosing and treating infertile males.

Materials and methods

Sample selection

The present study included 80 infertile male patients that presented at the Department of Andrology at the Shiyan Taihe Hospital (Hubei, China) from February 2014 to February 2016. We also recruited 20 cases of healthy male volunteers who had children as a positive control. The age range of all the study subjects was 25–39 years. The diagnostic standard of male infertility referred to the gold standard of the clinic which included the inability to get pregnant for 1 year or more despite a normal sexual life and no contraceptives. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiyan Taihe Hospital and informed consents were signed by the patients.

Routine inspection of sperm

The study subjects were asked to refrain from any sexual activity for 3–7 days, and then ejaculate the sperm sample through masturbation. The sperm samples were placed into a disinfected plastic container. After being fully liquefied by the constant temperature dry box, a routine inspection was conducted by using the semen detecting instrument (Barui Medical Equipment Co., Beijing, China) at Huaian First People's Hospital. Each sample was selectively observed from 6 fields of view, and parameters, such as semen volume, sperm density and motility, were detected.

Detecting sperm fragmentation DNA

The sperm fragmentation DNA detection kit (Biosharp, Hefei, China) and sperm chromatin diffusion method were used to detect sperm fragmentation DNA. The fresh semen was diluted using normal saline to the target concentration (5–10×106/ml), and sperm fragmentation DNA detection was operated according to kit instructions.

Detecting serum microelements and seminal plasma ROS level

Blood (5 µl) was taken from each study subject before breakfast. After the serum was separated, each microelement in the serum was detected according to the ELISA kit instructions. Within 30 min after the obtained semen sample was liquefied, the seminal plasma was obtained and an ELISA kit was utilized to detect seminal plasma ROS levels.

Statistical analysis

Experimental data were statistically analyzed using statistical software, SPSS 19.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). The association between the semen fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters, blood microelements and seminal plasma ROS were studied. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Analysis on sperm fragmentation DNA of infertile male patients

There were 80 male infertile patients and 20 males with children in this study. After their sperm DNA fragmentation indexes were analyzed, it was found that the sperm DNA fragmentation indexes of infertile patients were higher than the control subjects (p=0.008). Data information is shown in Table I and Fig. 1.
Table I.

Sperm fragmentation DNA indexes of infertile males and males who had children.

GroupDFI (%)
Infertile male patients36.5±3.87
Males who had children16.23±2.65
Figure 1.

Sperm fragmentation DNA indexes of infertile males and males who had children, **p<0.01.

Analysis of routine data of semen

After an analysis of routine data of the semen of infertile patients, it was found that the differences between sperm DNA fragmentation indexes and each conventional semen parameter had no statistical significance (p>0.05) (Table II). The study on the correlation between sperm DNA fragmentation index and each conventional semen parameter showed that the sperm DNA fragmentation index was not correlated with semen volume, sperm density, sperm motility and normal sperm formation rate (p>0.05) (Table III).
Table II.

Association between sperm fragmentation DNA and each parameter of semen.

GroupSemen volume (ml)Sperm motilityNormal form of sperm (%)Sperm density (106/ml)DFI (%)
Infertile male patients2.85±1.3328.21±12.033.82±3.532.3±17.636.5±3.87
Males who had children3.02±1.2132.01±11.893.55±2.838.6±12.816.23±2.65
Table III.

Study on the correlation between the sperm DNA fragmentation index and each conventional semen parameter.

Detection indexrP-value
Semen volume0.0670.106
Sperm density0.8150.533
Sperm motility−0.1140.068
Normal form rate of sperm−0.0890.093

Analysis on microelements in blood plasma

After the sperm DNA fragmentation index and microelements in blood plasma were analyzed, it was found that zinc and lead in blood plasma were positively correlated with sperm DNA fragmentation index (r=0.187, r=0.078, p<0.05). Magnesium was also negatively correlated with sperm DNA fragmentation index (r=0.263, p<0.05). Results are shown in Table IV.
Table IV.

Association between sperm DNA fragmentation index, conventional parameters and microelements in blood plasma.

ParametersZincIronCalciumMagnesiumLeadCopper
DFI (%)0.187[a]−0.0370.016−0.263[a]0.078[a]−0.132
Sperm−0.013−0.021−0.0420.053[a]0.0790.018
density
Sperm−0.223[a]−0.178−0.0870.285[a]−0.045−0.057
motility
Sperm−0.029[a]−0.022−0.0270.267[a]−0.0280.124
motility
rate

p<0.05.

Analysis on seminal plasma ROS

After an analysis of the sperm DNA fragmentation index and seminal plasma ROS, it was found that the sperm DNA fragmentation index in the infertility group was higher than that of control group. In addition, seminal plasma ROS levels were higher than those of males who had children (p<0.05). Results were shown in Table V and Fig. 2.
Table V.

Association between sperm DNA fragmentation index and seminal plasma ROS level.

GroupDFI (%)ROS level
Infertile male patients36.5±3.87548.9±108.2
Males who had children16.23±2.65416.3±95.5

ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Figure 2.

Seminal plasma ROS level of infertile males and males who had children, *p<0.05. ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Discussion

Genetic information of the parental generation is passed onto the offspring through fertilization of the egg by the sperm, and therefore, the integrity of sperm DNA is important to correctly pass on genetic material to offspring (7). Correlational studies have shown that the failures of natural childbirth and assisted reproductive technology are associated with sperm DNA damage. Although the exact causes of sperm DNA damage remain to be determined, it has been suggested that there are numerous reasons that cause it. Abnormities of environmental factors can lead to variation of genes and chromosomes, and because the DNA damage leads to the destruction of the integrity of genetic information, this may result in the occurrence of infertility. Additionally, leukocytes in human tissue may produce excessive ROS because of an increase in infectious diseases in the reproductive system, which causes further damage to sperm DNA (8). Under normal physiological status, ROS participates in processes such as regulating immunological surveillance, signal transduction and cell growth, and is therefore an important medium of signal transduction. ROS plays an important role in regulating body function and increasing probability of fertilization (9,10). The main components of ROS are free radicals, peroxide, oxygen ions and are mainly produced by leukocyte and sperm in semen. The reactivity of the oxygen in ROS may cause damage to the sperm of the cytomembrane, thus resulting in the damage of sperm DNA and impacting sperm motility, which may finally affect fertility (11). By analyzing the infertile male sperm DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters, this study has shown that the conventional semen parameters were not correlated with sperm DNA fragmentation index, and therefore, sperm DNA detection can be added to the diagnosis and treatment of infertile patients in clinic in addition to the routine semen analysis, which may further completely reflect male fertility (12). After an infertile male's sperm DNA fragmentation index and blood microelements were analyzed, it was found that zinc and lead in serum were positively correlated with the sperm DNA fragmentation index. The function of zinc is that it mainly has an effect on the thalamus-pituitary gland-testis axis (13), and through the regulation of the sex hormone secretion and controlling gonad development, it may have a great effect on semen quality and cause an issue of spermatogenesis, which may lead to male infertility (14). An excessive lead ion concentration in blood can produce toxic effects on sperm (15), and impact sperm motility, which may cause the decrease of male sperm quality and result in infertility. Magnesium in serum was found to be negatively correlated with sperm DNA fragmentation index. Study results also show that when the content of magnesium ion in the serum rises, sperm motility rates and rectilinear motion sperm motility rates notably increase, at the same time, sperm density also increases. The results of the present study on the association between infertile male sperm DNA fragmentation index and seminal plasma ROS levels have shown that the ROS levels in the infertility group were apparently higher than those of the normal childbirth group (p<0.05). The main reason of an increase in seminal plasma ROS levels casing sperm damage and thus resulting in infertility is that the sperm cytomembrane is damaged to varying degrees by the existence of a superoxide anion and oxygen free radicals (16–18). Additionally, correlational research data have shown that seminal plasma ROS levels have an effect on both sperm forward movement and sperm activity rate, which may cause a decrease in its activity rate (19). Therefore, in clinic, male fertility ability can be improved by reducing seminal plasma ROS levels. Sperm DNA chain break causes sperm DNA damage, leading to chromatin crosslinking, which is the main mechanism causing an increase in ROS levels and subsequently causing infertility. At the same time, it can reduce the production of the spermatoblast ATP, reduce the sperm motility rate, damage sperm cytomembrane and cause infertility (20–22). In conclusion, infertile male's sperm DNA fragmentation index is not correlated with conventional semen parameters but is positively correlated with blood microelements zinc, lead and seminal plasma ROS, and is negatively correlated with magnesium. The results above provide enough theoretical bases for diagnosing and treating infertile males in clinic.
  20 in total

Review 1.  The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Sheena E M Lewis; R John Aitken; Sarah J Conner; Geoffry De Iuliis; Donald P Evenson; Ralph Henkel; Aleksander Giwercman; Parviz Gharagozloo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation as causes of recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Sonia Brahem; Meriem Mehdi; Hanène Landolsi; Soumaya Mougou; Hatem Elghezal; Ali Saad
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  R J Aitken; G N De Iuliis
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Neuroinflammation and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: can anaesthesia be therapeutic?

Authors:  Robert D Sanders; Mervyn Maze
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Sperm DNA fragmentation index and pregnancy outcome after IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Leilei Zhu; Hesong Jiang; Hai Chen; Yun Chen; Yutian Dai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Nature of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa and the possible involvement of apoptosis.

Authors:  Denny Sakkas; Odette Moffatt; Gian Carlo Manicardi; Ewa Mariethoz; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Davide Bizzaro
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Predictive value of DNA integrity analysis in idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss following spontaneous conception.

Authors:  Kishlay Kumar; Deepika Deka; Amar Singh; D K Mitra; B R Vanitha; Rima Dada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan T Schulte; Dana A Ohl; Mark Sigman; Gary D Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Targeted monoclonal antibody therapy and radioimmunotherapy for lymphoproliferative disorders of the ocular adnexa.

Authors:  Debraj Shome; Bita Esmaeli
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 10.  Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Qiong Zhang; Yonggang Wang; Yanping Li
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  IMPORTANCE OF ZINC CONCENTRATION IN SEMINAL FLUID OF MEN DIAGNOSED WITH INFERTILITY.

Authors:  Andrea Milostić-Srb; Aleksandar Včev; Marijan Tandara; Svjetlana Marić; Vesna Kuić-Vadlja; Nika Srb; Dubravka Holik
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.780

2.  Correlations between abnormalities of morphological details and DNA fragmentation in human sperm.

Authors:  Hiep Tuyet Thi Nguyen; Hong Nhan Thi Dang; Thai Thanh Thi Nguyen; Trung Van Nguyen; Thuan Cong Dang; Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen; Minh Tam Le
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2022-02-24

3.  Effect of Zinc Supplementation on Urate Pathway Enzymes in Spermatozoa and Seminal Plasma of Iraqi Asthenozoospermic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Abdul Razzaq S Alsalman; Lamia A Almashhedy; Abdulsamie H Alta'ee; Mahmoud H Hadwan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.