Literature DB >> 23948450

The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment.

Sheena E M Lewis1, R John Aitken, Sarah J Conner, Geoffry De Iuliis, Donald P Evenson, Ralph Henkel, Aleksander Giwercman, Parviz Gharagozloo.   

Abstract

Sperm DNA damage is a useful biomarker for male infertility diagnosis and prediction of assisted reproduction outcomes. It is associated with reduced fertilization rates, embryo quality and pregnancy rates, and higher rates of spontaneous miscarriage and childhood diseases. This review provides a synopsis of the most recent studies from each of the authors, all of whom have major track records in the field of sperm DNA damage in the clinical setting. It explores current laboratory tests and the accumulating body of knowledge concerning the relationship between sperm DNA damage and clinical outcomes. The paper proceeds to discuss the strengths, weaknesses and clinical applicability of current sperm DNA tests. Next, the biological significance of DNA damage in the male germ line is considered. Finally, as sperm DNA damage is often the result of oxidative stress in the male reproductive tract, the potential contribution of antioxidant therapy in the clinical management of this condition is discussed. DNA damage in human spermatozoa is an important attribute of semen quality. It should be part of the clinical work up and properly controlled trials addressing the effectiveness of antioxidant therapy should be undertaken as a matter of urgency. Sperm DNA damage is a useful biomarker for male infertility diagnosis and prediction of assisted reproduction outcomes. It is associated with reduced fertilization rates, embryo quality and pregnancy rates, and higher rates of spontaneous miscarriage and childhood diseases. With all of these fertility check points, it shows more promise than conventional semen parameters from a diagnostic perspective. Despite this, few infertility clinics use it routinely. This review provides a synopsis of the most recent studies from each of the authors, all of whom have major track records in the field of sperm DNA damage in the clinical setting. It explores current laboratory tests and the accumulating body of knowledge concerning the relationship between sperm DNA damage and clinical outcomes. The paper proceeds to discuss the strengths and weaknesses and clinical applicability of current sperm DNA fragmentation tests. Next, the biological significance of DNA damage in the male germ line is considered. Finally, as sperm DNA damage is often the result of increased oxidative stress in the male reproductive tract, the potential contribution of antioxidant therapy in the clinical management of this condition is discussed. As those working in this field of clinical research, we conclude that DNA damage in human spermatozoa is an important attribute of semen quality which should be carefully assessed in the clinical work up of infertile couples and that properly controlled trials addressing the effectiveness of antioxidant therapy should be undertaken as a matter of urgency.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA fragmentation; Male infertility; antioxidant therapy; assisted reproduction; oxidized bases; spermatozoa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23948450     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  73 in total

1.  Comparing reactive oxygen species and DNA fragmentation in semen samples of unexplained infertile and healthy fertile men.

Authors:  Zahra Zandieh; Akram Vatannejad; Mahmood Doosti; Sara Zabihzadeh; Mahnaz Haddadi; Leila Bajelan; Batool Rashidi; Saeid Amanpour
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay using bench top flow cytometer for evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation in fertility laboratories: protocol, reference values, and quality control.

Authors:  Rakesh Sharma; Gulfam Ahmad; Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Emerging technologies for home-based semen analysis.

Authors:  S Yu; M Rubin; S Geevarughese; J S Pino; H F Rodriguez; W Asghar
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  The impact of varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation and pregnancy rate in subfertile men with normal semen parameters: A pilot study.

Authors:  Atef Fathi; Omar Mohamed; Osama Mahmoud; Gamal A Alsagheer; A M Reyad; Ahmed Abolyosr; Mohamed Sayed Abdel-Kader; Mohammed Saber-Khalaf
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-02-14

6.  Antioxidants for male subfertility.

Authors:  Roos M Smits; Rebecca Mackenzie-Proctor; Anusch Yazdani; Marcin T Stankiewicz; Vanessa Jordan; Marian G Showell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-14

7.  A simple sperm DNA toroid integrity test and risk of miscarriage.

Authors:  Philip J Chan; Eliza M Orzylowska; Johannah U Corselli; John D Jacobson; Albert K Wei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index.

Authors:  Jamal Hamidi; Christophe Frainais; Edouard Amar; Eric Bailly; Patrice Clément; Yves Ménézo
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 1.442

9.  ICSI treatment of severe male infertility can achieve prospective embryo quality compared with IVF of fertile donor sperm on sibling oocytes.

Authors:  Ju-Fen Zheng; Xiao-Bao Chen; Lei-Wen Zhao; Min-Zhi Gao; Jie Peng; Xian-Qin Qu; Hui-Juan Shi; Xing-Liang Jin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Male obesity and subfertility, is it really about increased adiposity?

Authors:  Nicole O McPherson; Michelle Lane
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.