Literature DB >> 29902309

Risk Factors for Corrective Septorhinoplasty Associated With Initial Treatment of Isolated Nasal Fracture.

Kevin Li1, Sami P Moubayed2, Emily Spataro3, Sam P Most3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Initial treatment of nasal fractures can result in long-standing cosmetic or functional defects, but the risk factors for subsequent septorhinoplasty have not been explored.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors for septorhinoplasty after the initial treatment of isolated nasal fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective population-based analysis of US patients diagnosed with nasal fracture between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, used insurance claims data from the Commercial and Medicare Supplemental categories of the Truven Health MarketScan database. Of the 340 715 patients diagnosed with nasal fracture, 78 474 were included in the final study cohort, excluding those who did not meet enrollment criteria or were diagnosed with concomitant facial fracture. Patients were classified into 1 of 4 groups according to the type and timing of treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Septorhinoplasty between 6 and 24 months after nasal fracture diagnosis. Explanatory variables included initial fracture treatment, demographics, comorbidities, and diagnoses associated with a preexisting nasal obstruction or defect.
RESULTS: Most of the 78 474 patients were under 65 years of age (66 770 [85.1%]) and male (41 997 [53.5%]) and lived in an urban area (67 938 [86.6%]). Among patients with no preexisting diagnosis of nasal obstruction or defect, open treatment within 3 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.32) of nasal fracture and between 3 weeks and 6 months (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.04) after fracture were associated with increased risk of subsequent septorhinoplasty. In patients with a diagnosis of preexisting nasal obstruction or defect, observation (aOR, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.80-4.53), closed reduction treatment (aOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.93-4.96), and open treatment within 3 weeks (aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.48-2.77) of fracture were all associated with increased risk of subsequent septorhinoplasty, with observation having the highest risk. Patients were also more likely to undergo subsequent septorhinoplasty if they were younger than 65 years, with the greatest risk seen in patients 18 to 34 years of age (aOR, 6.02; 95% CI, 4.26-8.50), lived in an urban area (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.44), or had a history of anxiety (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.18-1.78), but less likely if they were male (aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that a preexisting diagnosis of nasal obstruction or defect and other aspects of a patient's history are factors to consider when assessing the likelihood of surgical revision of initial treatment of nasal fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29902309      PMCID: PMC6248209          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  22 in total

Review 1.  Present day treatment of nasal fractures: closed versus open reduction.

Authors:  C D Verwoerd
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.446

2.  Geographic Variation in Access to Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Andrew R Bauder; Jonathan R Sarik; Paris D Butler; R Barrett Noone; John P Fischer; Joseph M Serletti; Suhail K Kanchwala; Stephen J Kovach; Justin P Fox
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  The geographic distribution of physicians revisited.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Alan Zaslavsky; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Management of recent nasal fractures.

Authors:  S FOMON; A SCHATTNER; J W BELL; L KLEINFELD; R LEWY
Journal:  AMA Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1952-03

Review 5.  An Algorithm for the Initial Management of Nasal Trauma.

Authors:  John F Hoffmann
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 1.446

6.  Revision Rates and Risk Factors of 175 842 Patients Undergoing Septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  Emily Spataro; Jay F Piccirillo; Dorina Kallogjeri; Gregory H Branham; Shaun C Desai
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

Review 7.  Complications of Nasal Bone Fractures.

Authors:  Kun Hwang; Seung Han Yeom; Suk Hyun Hwang
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Leighton Chan; L Gary Hart; David C Goodman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Acute nasal fracture management: A prospective study and literature review.

Authors:  Naveed Basheeth; Martin Donnelly; Smyth David; Shandilya Munish
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  The ethnic nose.

Authors:  Thomas Romo; Manoj T Abraham
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.446

View more
  2 in total

1.  Practicing functional nasal surgery in the non-urban setting: experience from a single center.

Authors:  Tristan Tham; Matthew I Saleem; McKenna Hawthorne; Alexandros Georgolios
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-23

2.  Effectiveness of endoscopic intranasal incision reduction for nasal fractures.

Authors:  Shu Yan; Yan Jiang; Yan Wang; Kaixuan Chen; Xudong Yan; Xiaohan Sun; Jisheng Zhang; Na Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.