Literature DB >> 25959006

Acute nasal fracture management: A prospective study and literature review.

Naveed Basheeth1, Martin Donnelly1, Smyth David1, Shandilya Munish1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Functional and cosmetic deformities are common after nasal injuries and at times necessitate advanced surgery to reverse the effects of trauma. This study was designed to study the factors related to nasal injury and patient parameters in influencing the acute management of nasal injuries and its outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
METHODS: Nasal injuries from County Waterford in Southeast Ireland were referred to a new Cost-Neutral Nasal Fracture Clinic. The first 400 patients from this prospective audit, referred to Waterford Regional Hospital from August 2009 through December 2010, were included in this study. Twenty-one variables, including satisfaction scores using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), were studied. Data was obtained at each stage of management, from initial assessment in ears, nose, and throat (ENT) casualty to being seen and further reviewed in consultant-based specialty clinic.
RESULTS: Men outnumbered women 72: 28, and the mean age was 26.89 (0.4 years-87 years). Patients presenting time to the ENT casualty after the injury ranged between 1 and 90 days (mean 10.5 days). The interval between injury and intervention was on an average 6.1 days. Accident (41%) and soccer (46%), among the sports group, were predominantly related to nasal injury. The overall satisfaction rate was 77.5% for breathing and 85.6% for cosmesis. One hundred twenty-seven (31.8%) patients were referred to and managed from the septorhinoplasty clinic. Overall, 11% required septorhinoplasty. Patient satisfaction was seen in manipulation performed up to 5 weeks postinjury.
CONCLUSION: Our databank is the largest prospectively studied series of nasal-fracture management from Ireland. The incidence of nasal fracture in the southeast of Ireland is 0.37%. Age, gender, mode of injury, and type of sport influenced the satisfaction rates in this study. This type of service may not be practical in all ENT departments, but a regional center may be an idea worth considering.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal fracture; VAS; deformity; nasal manipulation; patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25959006     DOI: 10.1002/lary.25358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study Analyzing Factors Influencing Complications after Nasal Trauma.

Authors:  Patricio Andrades; Nicolas Pereira; Diego Rodriguez; Claudio Borel; Rodrigo Hernández; Rodrigo Villalobos
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-04-12

2.  Diagnosis of acute nasal fractures using ultrasound and CT scan.

Authors:  Peyman Astaraki; Bahareh Baghchi; Maryam Ahadi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Nasal Trauma: Who Nose what happens to the non-manipulated?

Authors:  N Hope; K Young; K Mclaughlin; C Smyth
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Olfactory Dysfunction in Nasal Bone Fracture.

Authors:  Sug Won Kim; Beom Park; Tae Geun Lee; Ji Ye Kim
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-26

5.  Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Nasal Fractures.

Authors:  Cigdem Firat Koca; Turgut Celik; Sukru Aydin; Mehmet Kelles; Seyma Yasar
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Risk Factors for Corrective Septorhinoplasty Associated With Initial Treatment of Isolated Nasal Fracture.

Authors:  Kevin Li; Sami P Moubayed; Emily Spataro; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Effectiveness of endoscopic intranasal incision reduction for nasal fractures.

Authors:  Shu Yan; Yan Jiang; Yan Wang; Kaixuan Chen; Xudong Yan; Xiaohan Sun; Jisheng Zhang; Na Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.