Aaron M Goodman1,2,3, David Piccioni4, Shumei Kato1,2, Amélie Boichard2, Huan-You Wang5, Garrett Frampton6, Scott M Lippman1,2, Caitlin Connelly6, David Fabrizio6, Vincent Miller6, Jason K Sicklick7, Razelle Kurzrock1,2. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 2. Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 3. Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 4. Division of Neurological Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 5. Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 6. Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Abstract
Importance: Copy number alterations in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1 or CD274), programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PDCD1LG2 or PDL2), and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) genes (chromosome 9p24.1) characterize Hodgkin lymphoma, resulting in high response rates to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade. The prevalence and utility of PDL1 amplification as a response biomarker to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade are unknown in other tumors. Objectives: To examine the prevalence of PDL1 amplification and its utility as a response biomarker to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in solid tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective study (October 1, 2012, to October 1, 2017) used a deidentified tumor database from a commercial company and annotated clinical records from a subset of patients treated at a university tertiary referral center. The study analyzed 118 187 tumors from the deidentified database, including a clinically annotated subgroup of 2039 malignant tumors. Interventions: Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on all samples to determine PDL1 amplification, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden (TMB). A subset of patients was treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of PDL1 amplification was determined among 118 187 patient samples that underwent next-generation sequencing. Solid tumors treated with checkpoint blockade were evaluated for response and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 118 187 deidentified tumor samples, PDL1 amplifications were identified in 843 (0.7%), including more than 100 types of solid tumors. Most PDL1-amplified tumors (84.8%) had a low to intermediate TMB. PDL1 amplification did not always correlate with high-positive PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemical analysis. Six of 9 patients (66.7%) from 1 center with PDL1-amplified solid tumors had objective responses after checkpoint blockade administration. The median PFS among all treated patients was 15.2 months. Responders included 1 patient with glioblastoma (PFS, ≥5.2 months), 2 patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (PFS, ≥9 and 15.2 months), 2 patients with metastatic basal cell cancer (PFS, 3.8 and ≥24.1 months), and 1 patient with urothelial cancer (PFS, ≥17.8 months). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that PDL1 amplification occurs in a small subset of malignant tumors. Additional large-scale, prospective studies of PDL1-amplified cancers are warranted to confirm the responses to checkpoint blockade described herein, even in the absence of microsatellite instability, high PD-L1 expression, and a high TMB.
Importance: Copy number alterations in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1 or CD274), programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PDCD1LG2 or PDL2), and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) genes (chromosome 9p24.1) characterize Hodgkin lymphoma, resulting in high response rates to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade. The prevalence and utility of PDL1 amplification as a response biomarker to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade are unknown in other tumors. Objectives: To examine the prevalence of PDL1 amplification and its utility as a response biomarker to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in solid tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective study (October 1, 2012, to October 1, 2017) used a deidentified tumor database from a commercial company and annotated clinical records from a subset of patients treated at a university tertiary referral center. The study analyzed 118 187 tumors from the deidentified database, including a clinically annotated subgroup of 2039 malignant tumors. Interventions: Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on all samples to determine PDL1 amplification, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden (TMB). A subset of patients was treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of PDL1 amplification was determined among 118 187 patient samples that underwent next-generation sequencing. Solid tumors treated with checkpoint blockade were evaluated for response and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 118 187 deidentified tumor samples, PDL1 amplifications were identified in 843 (0.7%), including more than 100 types of solid tumors. Most PDL1-amplified tumors (84.8%) had a low to intermediate TMB. PDL1 amplification did not always correlate with high-positive PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemical analysis. Six of 9 patients (66.7%) from 1 center with PDL1-amplified solid tumors had objective responses after checkpoint blockade administration. The median PFS among all treated patients was 15.2 months. Responders included 1 patient with glioblastoma (PFS, ≥5.2 months), 2 patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (PFS, ≥9 and 15.2 months), 2 patients with metastatic basal cell cancer (PFS, 3.8 and ≥24.1 months), and 1 patient with urothelial cancer (PFS, ≥17.8 months). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that PDL1 amplification occurs in a small subset of malignant tumors. Additional large-scale, prospective studies of PDL1-amplified cancers are warranted to confirm the responses to checkpoint blockade described herein, even in the absence of microsatellite instability, high PD-L1 expression, and a high TMB.
Authors: Michael R Green; Scott Rodig; Przemyslaw Juszczynski; Jing Ouyang; Papiya Sinha; Evan O'Donnell; Donna Neuberg; Margaret A Shipp Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael R Green; Stefano Monti; Scott J Rodig; Przemyslaw Juszczynski; Treeve Currie; Evan O'Donnell; Bjoern Chapuy; Kunihiko Takeyama; Donna Neuberg; Todd R Golub; Jeffery L Kutok; Margaret A Shipp Journal: Blood Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Hamid Chalian; Hüseyin Gürkan Töre; Jeanne M Horowitz; Riad Salem; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai Journal: Radiographics Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: David D W Twa; Anja Mottok; Fong Chun Chan; Susana Ben-Neriah; Bruce W Woolcock; King L Tan; Andrew J Mungall; Helen McDonald; Yongjun Zhao; Raymond S Lim; Brad H Nelson; Katy Milne; Sohrab P Shah; Ryan D Morin; Marco A Marra; David W Scott; Randy D Gascoyne; Christian Steidl Journal: J Pathol Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eric Bouffet; Valérie Larouche; Brittany B Campbell; Daniele Merico; Richard de Borja; Melyssa Aronson; Carol Durno; Joerg Krueger; Vanja Cabric; Vijay Ramaswamy; Nataliya Zhukova; Gary Mason; Roula Farah; Samina Afzal; Michal Yalon; Gideon Rechavi; Vanan Magimairajan; Michael F Walsh; Shlomi Constantini; Rina Dvir; Ronit Elhasid; Alyssa Reddy; Michael Osborn; Michael Sullivan; Jordan Hansford; Andrew Dodgshun; Nancy Klauber-Demore; Lindsay Peterson; Sunil Patel; Scott Lindhorst; Jeffrey Atkinson; Zane Cohen; Rachel Laframboise; Peter Dirks; Michael Taylor; David Malkin; Steffen Albrecht; Roy W R Dudley; Nada Jabado; Cynthia E Hawkins; Adam Shlien; Uri Tabori Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael T Barrett; Karen S Anderson; Elizabeth Lenkiewicz; Mariacarla Andreozzi; Heather E Cunliffe; Christine L Klassen; Amylou C Dueck; Ann E McCullough; Srikanth K Reddy; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Donald W Northfelt; Barbara A Pockaj Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-09-22
Authors: Zachary R Chalmers; Caitlin F Connelly; David Fabrizio; Laurie Gay; Siraj M Ali; Riley Ennis; Alexa Schrock; Brittany Campbell; Adam Shlien; Juliann Chmielecki; Franklin Huang; Yuting He; James Sun; Uri Tabori; Mark Kennedy; Daniel S Lieber; Steven Roels; Jared White; Geoffrey A Otto; Jeffrey S Ross; Levi Garraway; Vincent A Miller; Phillip J Stephens; Garrett M Frampton Journal: Genome Med Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Sounak Gupta; Chad M Vanderbilt; Paolo Cotzia; Javier A Arias-Stella; Jason C Chang; Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Khedouja Nafa; Pedram Razavi; David M Hyman; José Baselga; Michael F Berger; Marc Ladanyi; Maria E Arcila; Dara S Ross Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Sounak Gupta; Chad M Vanderbilt; Paolo Cotzia; Javier A Arias Stella; Jason C Chang; Yingbei Chen; Laura H Tang; Deborah F DeLair; Jinjuan Yao; Marc Ladanyi; Dara S Ross Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Jun Gong; Sandip Patel; Jacob J Adashek; David Frishberg; Michelle Guan; Veronica R Placencio-Hickok; Alexandra Gangi; Gillian Gresham; Richard Tuli; Young K Chae; Razelle Kurzrock; Andrew E Hendifar Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-05-15
Authors: Richard S P Huang; James Haberberger; Lukas Harries; Eric Severson; Daniel L Duncan; N Lynn Ferguson; Amanda Hemmerich; Claire Edgerly; Karthikeyan Murugesan; Jinpeng Xiao; Deborah McEwan; Oliver Holmes; Matthew Hiemenz; Jeffrey Venstrom; Julia A Elvin; James Creeden; Douglas I Lin; Jeffrey S Ross; Shakti H Ramkissoon Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-03-25
Authors: Kenneth C W Wong; Edwin P Hui; Kwok-Wai Lo; Wai Kei Jacky Lam; David Johnson; Lili Li; Qian Tao; Kwan Chee Allen Chan; Ka-Fai To; Ann D King; Brigette B Y Ma; Anthony T C Chan Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 66.675