PURPOSE: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a molecule expressed on antigen-presenting cells that engages the PD-1 receptor on T cells and inhibits T-cell receptor signaling. The PD-1 axis can be exploited by tumor cells to dampen host antitumor immune responses and foster tumor cell survival. PD-1 blockade has shown promise in multiple malignancies but should be directed toward patients in whom it will be most effective. In recent studies, we found that the chromosome 9p24.1 amplification increased the gene dosage of PD-L1 and its induction by JAK2 in a subset of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, cHLs with normal 9p24.1 copy numbers also expressed detectable PD-L1, prompting analyses of additional PD-L1 regulatory mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Herein, we utilized immunohistochemical, genomic, and functional analyses to define alternative mechanisms of PD-L1 activation in cHL and additional EBV(+) lymphoproliferative disorders. RESULTS: We identified an AP-1-responsive enhancer in the PD-L1 gene. In cHL Reed-Sternberg cells, which exhibit constitutive AP-1 activation, the PD-L1 enhancer binds AP-1 components and increases PD-L1 promoter activity. In addition, we defined Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection as an alternative mechanism for PD-L1 induction in cHLs with diploid 9p24.1. PD-L1 was also expressed by EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines as a result of latent membrane protein 1-mediated, JAK/STAT-dependent promoter and AP-1-associated enhancer activity. In addition, more than 70% of EBV(+) posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders expressed detectable PD-L1. CONCLUSIONS: AP-1 signaling and EBV infection represent alternative mechanisms of PD-L1 induction and extend the spectrum of tumors in which to consider PD-1 blockade.
PURPOSE:Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a molecule expressed on antigen-presenting cells that engages the PD-1 receptor on T cells and inhibits T-cell receptor signaling. The PD-1 axis can be exploited by tumor cells to dampen host antitumor immune responses and foster tumor cell survival. PD-1 blockade has shown promise in multiple malignancies but should be directed toward patients in whom it will be most effective. In recent studies, we found that the chromosome 9p24.1 amplification increased the gene dosage of PD-L1 and its induction by JAK2 in a subset of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, cHLs with normal 9p24.1 copy numbers also expressed detectable PD-L1, prompting analyses of additional PD-L1 regulatory mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Herein, we utilized immunohistochemical, genomic, and functional analyses to define alternative mechanisms of PD-L1 activation in cHL and additional EBV(+) lymphoproliferative disorders. RESULTS: We identified an AP-1-responsive enhancer in the PD-L1 gene. In cHL Reed-Sternberg cells, which exhibit constitutive AP-1 activation, the PD-L1 enhancer binds AP-1 components and increases PD-L1 promoter activity. In addition, we defined Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection as an alternative mechanism for PD-L1 induction in cHLs with diploid 9p24.1. PD-L1 was also expressed by EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines as a result of latent membrane protein 1-mediated, JAK/STAT-dependent promoter and AP-1-associated enhancer activity. In addition, more than 70% of EBV(+) posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders expressed detectable PD-L1. CONCLUSIONS:AP-1 signaling and EBV infection represent alternative mechanisms of PD-L1 induction and extend the spectrum of tumors in which to consider PD-1 blockade.
Authors: Angela Meier; Aranya Bagchi; Harlyn K Sidhu; Galit Alter; Todd J Suscovich; Daniel G Kavanagh; Hendrik Streeck; Mark A Brockman; Sylvie LeGall; Judith Hellman; Marcus Altfeld Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Zheng Zhang; Ji-Yuan Zhang; E John Wherry; Bo Jin; Bin Xu; Zheng-Sheng Zou; Shu-Ye Zhang; Bao-Sen Li; Hui-Feng Wang; Hao Wu; George K K Lau; Yang-Xin Fu; Fu-Sheng Wang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-03-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: M Vockerodt; S L Morgan; M Kuo; W Wei; M B Chukwuma; J R Arrand; D Kube; J Gordon; L S Young; C B Woodman; P G Murray Journal: J Pathol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Martin Loos; Nathalia A Giese; Jörg Kleeff; Thomas Giese; Matthias M Gaida; Frank Bergmann; Melanie Laschinger; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: J A Yared; N Hardy; Z Singh; S Hajj; A Z Badros; M Kocoglu; S Yanovich; E A Sausville; C Ujjani; K Ruehle; C Goecke; M Landau; A P Rapoport Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Paul J Bröckelmann; Helen Goergen; Ulrich Keller; Julia Meissner; Rainer Ordemann; Teresa V Halbsguth; Stephanie Sasse; Martin Sökler; Andrea Kerkhoff; Stephan Mathas; Andreas Hüttmann; Matthias Bormann; Andreas Zimmermann; Jasmin Mettler; Michael Fuchs; Bastian von Tresckow; Christian Baues; Andreas Rosenwald; Wolfram Klapper; Carsten Kobe; Peter Borchmann; Andreas Engert Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Janice M Mehnert; Arta M Monjazeb; Johanna M T Beerthuijzen; Deborah Collyar; Larry Rubinstein; Lyndsay N Harris Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephen M Ansell; Alexander M Lesokhin; Ivan Borrello; Ahmad Halwani; Emma C Scott; Martin Gutierrez; Stephen J Schuster; Michael M Millenson; Deepika Cattry; Gordon J Freeman; Scott J Rodig; Bjoern Chapuy; Azra H Ligon; Lili Zhu; Joseph F Grosso; Su Young Kim; John M Timmerman; Margaret A Shipp; Philippe Armand Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245