| Literature DB >> 29902231 |
Ye Xia1, Amna Amna1,2, Stephen Obol Opiyo1.
Abstract
Plants have a diverse endophytic microbiome that is functionally important for their growth, development, and health. In this study, the diversity and specificity of culturable endophytic fungal communities were explored in one of the most important biofuel crops, switchgrass plants (Panicum virgatum L.), which have been cultivated on a reclaimed coal-mining site for more than 20 years. The endophytic fungi were isolated from the surface-sterilized shoot (leaf and stem), root, and seed tissues of switchgrass plants and then cultured for identification. A total of 1339 fungal isolates were found and 22 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were sequence identified by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) primers and grouped into 7 orders and 4 classes. Although a diverse range of endophytic fungi associated with switchgrass were documented, the most abundant class, order, and species were Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, and Fusarium spp. respectively. About 86% of the isolated endophytic fungi were able to enhance the heights of the shoots; 69% could increase the shoot fresh weights; and 62% could improve the shoot dry weights after being reintroduced back into the switchgrass plants, which illustrated their functional importance. Through the Shannon Diversity Index analysis, we observed a gradation of species diversity, with shoots and roots having the similar values and seeds having a lesser value. It was observed that the switchgrass plants showing better growth performance displayed higher endophytic fungal species diversity and abundance. It was also discovered that the rhizosphere soil organic matter content was positively correlated with the fungal species diversity. All these data demonstrate the functional association of these beneficial endophytic fungi with switchgrass and their great potential in improving the switchgrass growth and biomass to benefit the biofuel industry by reducing chemical inputs and burden to the environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29902231 PMCID: PMC6002093 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The distribution of endophytic fungal isolates from switchgrass.
The isolate numbers (A) and strain types (B) at the order level; and the isolate numbers (C) and strain types (D) at the class level.
Fig 2The distribution of endophytic fungi at species level between two locations on coal-mining site.
The abundance of the endophytic fungi from switchgrass.
| Relative abundance | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number (n) | Part 1 | Part 2 | p-value |
The fungi were collected from different tissues of switchgrass grown from different locations (part 1 or part 2) on a coal-mining site. The p-values were calculated using the function cor.test of R statistical software.
Shannon indices values and difference analysis of endophytic fungal species diversity.
| Plant | Factors | Shannon indices | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shoot vs. Root | 2.68 vs. 2.60 | 0.17 | |
The comparison was analyzed between two locations (Part 1 or Part 2) and among different plant tissues of switchgrass plants from the coal-mining site with the p-values being calculated by Hutcheson t-test.
Endophytic fungal species abundance among tissues.
| Relative abundance | Relative abundance | |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue Type | Part 1 | Part 2 |
| 0.58 | 0.53 | |
| 0.32 | 0.36 | |
| 0.10 | 0.11 | |
The analysis was based on the tissue distribution of plants collected from each location (Part 1 vs. Part 2) with the p-values being calculated by ANOVA (Analysis of Variance).
Fig 3The distribution of endophytic fungi at species level.
The data were analyzed among different tissues of switchgrass grown on the coal-mining site.
The levels of pH, organic matter, and major nutrient contents of plant rhizosphere soil.
| Part 1 | Part 2 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.50±5.31 | 1.71±0.34 | <0.05 | |
| 7.48±0.25 | 6.08±0.23 | <0.05 | |
| 0.16±0.003 | 0.04±0.002 | <0.05 | |
| 0.67±0.14 | 1.66±0.63 | <0.05 | |
| 52.33±12.86 | 70.33±3.17 | <0.05 |
The data were analyzed between two locations (part 1 and part 2) on the coal-mining site and the p-values were calculated by Student’s t-test.
The correlation between Shannon Index value and soil variables.
| Shannon Index | Shannon Index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation | P-value | Correlation | P-value | |
| 0.98 | <0.001 | 0.66 | <0.05 | |
| -0.01 | 0.987 | 0.58 | 0.061 | |
| 0.39 | 0.739 | 0.50 | 0.085 | |
| -0.06 | 0.962 | 0.99 | <0.001 | |
| -0.84 | <0.001 | -0.27 | 0.674 | |
The p-values were calculated using the function cor.test of R statistical software.
Fig 4The shoot dry weights of the switchgrass plants.
The plants were treated with water control and the water broth containing diverse fungal spores and mycelia at 8 weeks under greenhouse condition. The triangle represents the significant difference existing between the fungal broth treated and water treated plants; the data were further analyzed by the Student’s t-test (P<0.05).