| Literature DB >> 28030648 |
Keiko Yamaji1, Yumiko Watanabe1, Hayato Masuya2, Arisa Shigeto1, Hiroshi Yui1, Toshikatsu Haruma1.
Abstract
Clethra barbinervis Sieb. et Zucc. is a tree species that grows naturally at several mine sites and seems to be tolerant of high concentrations of heavy metals, such as Cu, Zn, and Pb. The purpose of this study is to clarify the mechanism(s) underlying this species' ability to tolerate the sites' severe heavy-metal pollution by considering C. barbinervis interaction with root fungal endophytes. We measured the heavy metal concentrations of root-zone soil, leaves, branches, and fine roots collected from mature C. barbinervis at Hitachi mine. We isolated fungal endophytes from surface-sterilized root segments, and we examined the growth, and heavy metal and nutrient absorption of C. barbinervis seedlings growing in sterilized mine soil with or without root fungal endophytes. Field analyses showed that C. barbinervis contained considerably high amounts of Cu, Zn, and Pb in fine roots and Zn in leaves. The fungi, Phialocephala fortinii, Rhizodermea veluwensis, and Rhizoscyphus sp. were frequently isolated as dominant fungal endophyte species. Inoculation of these root fungal endophytes to C. barbinervis seedlings growing in sterilized mine soil indicated that these fungi significantly enhanced the growth of C. barbinervis seedlings, increased K uptake in shoots and reduced the concentrations of Cu, Ni, Zn, Cd, and Pb in roots. Without root fungal endophytes, C. barbinervis could hardly grow under the heavy-metal contaminated condition, showing chlorosis, a symptom of heavy-metal toxicity. Our results indicate that the tree C. barbinervis can tolerate high heavy-metal concentrations due to the support of root fungal endophytes including P. fortinii, R. veluwensis, and Rhizoscyphus sp. via growth enhancement, K uptake promotion and decrease of heavy metal concentrations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28030648 PMCID: PMC5193448 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Detection rates of fungi isolated from C. barbinervis roots.
| Fungus | June (%) | August (%) | October (%) | Mean±SE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4 | 14 | 7.7 ± 3.2 | |
| 11 | 10 | 22 | 14.2 ± 3.8 | |
| 25 | 34 | 23 | 26.8 ± 3.4 |
The means of percentages in June, August, and October are shown with ±SE.
Fig 1Root fungal endophyte inoculation increased C. barbinervis seedling growth in the inoculation test.
Seedlings were grown for 40 days in sterilized heavy-metal-polluted soil. Scale bar represents 10 mm.
Seedling growth parameters after the inoculation test.
| Treatment | Number of leaves | Height (mm) | Root length (cm) | Aboveground part FW (mg) | Root FW (mg) | Aboveground part DW (mg) | Root DW (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5.0 ± 0.3 a | 5.9 ± 0.4 a | 10.8 ± 2.9 a | 5.8 ± 1.1 a | 1.8 ± 0.2 a | 5.1 ± 1.3 a | 0.8 ± 0.0 a |
| 11.1 ± 0.9 b | 28.1 ± 3.7 c | 123.0 ± 23.4 b | 61.4 ± 10.8 b | 49.2 ± 9.3 c | 23.0 ± 4.0 a | 10.7 ± 1.37 ab | |
| 10.9 ± 1.6 b | 15.7 ± 3.0 ab | 71.6 ± 22.7 ab | 30.0 ± 7.6 ab | 11.7 ± 3.1 ab | 19.7 ± 5.1 a | 5.5 ± 1.4 ab | |
| 10.6 ± 1.4 b | 18.5 ± 3.3 bc | 134.5 ± 37.1 b | 39.6 ± 11.8 ab | 34.1 ± 12.5 bc | 23.7 ± 7.9 a | 11.2 ± 4.1 b | |
| Mixture | 9.3 ± 0.6 ab | 15.3 ± 2.3 ab | 71.5 ± 10.4 ab | 32.4 ± 9.1 ab | 21.6 ± 7.6 abc | 13.0 ± 1.5 a | 6.5 ± 1.6 ab |
FW: fresh weight. DW: dry weight. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference among treatments in ANOVA comparisons and post-hoc Tukey HSD at P < 0.05. For number of leaves, height, shoot FW, and root FW, n = 12. For root length, shoot DW, and root DW, n = 3. The means are shown with ±SE.
Fig 2Nutrient element concentrations in C. barbinervis seedlings in the inoculation test.
(a) Concentrations in aboveground parts, and (b) concentrations in roots. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference among treatments in ANOVA comparisons and the post-hoc Tukey HSD at P < 0.05. Error bars represent ± SE.
Fig 3Heavy-metal concentrations in C. barbinervis seedlings in the inoculation test.
(a) Concentrations in aboveground parts, and (b) concentrations in roots. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference among treatments in ANOVA comparisons and the post-hoc Tukey HSD at P < 0.05. Error bars represent ± SE.
Transfer factors (ratios of root concentration to soil concentration) of heavy metals in the inoculation test.
| Treatment | Transfer factor Cu | Transfer factor Ni | Transfer factor Zn | Transfer factor Cd | Transfer factor Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.44 ± 0.03 a | 33.7 ± 0.04 a | 4.38 ± 0.67 a | 59.0 ± 1.03 a | 2.32 ± 0.48 a |
| 0.23 ± 0.03 b | 3.82 ± 0.03 b | 1.65 ± 0.43 b | 8.99 ± 0.48 b | 0.32 ± 0.14 b | |
| 0.25 ± 0.03 b | 6.53 ± 2.32 b | 1.74 ± 0.45 b | 12.1 ± 3.85 b | 0.56 ± 0.16 b | |
| 0.18 ± 0.01 b | 5.25 ± 1.11 b | 1.80 ± 0.13 b | 11.5 ± 2.14 b | 0.41 ± 0.05 b | |
| Mixture | 0.24 ± 0.01 b | 4.78 ± 1.25 b | 1.67 ± 0.27 b | 9.15 ± 1.59 b | 0.42 ± 0.10 b |
Transfer factor (ratio of root concentration to soil concentration used for the inoculation test) was calculated using each sample. The means are shown with ±SE. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference among treatments in ANOVA comparisons and post-hoc Tukey HSD at P < 0.05. n = 3.