Literature DB >> 29901568

PD-L1 Assays 22C3 and SP263 are Not Interchangeable in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer When Considering Clinically Relevant Cutoffs: An Interclone Evaluation by Differently Trained Pathologists.

Enrico Munari1, Giulio Rossi2, Giuseppe Zamboni1,3, Gianluigi Lunardi4, Marcella Marconi1, Marco Sommaggio1, George J Netto5, Mohammad O Hoque6, Matteo Brunelli3, Guido Martignoni3,1, Michael C Haffner7, Francesca Moretta8, Maria C Pegoraro9, Alberto Cavazza10, Giuseppina Samogin11, Vanna Furlan11, Francesca R Mariotti12, Paola Vacca12, Lorenzo Moretta12, Giuseppe Bogina1.   

Abstract

Pembrolizumab is the only programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor for treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with a companion diagnostic assay, the 22C3 PharmDx. Although in many studies 22C3 and Ventana's SP263 appear to yield overlapping results, they show discrepancies at clinically relevant cutoffs (1% and 50%). We provide a solid comparison between 22C3 and SP263 assays in a large cohort of non-small cell lung cancer cases taking into account interobserver variability between trained pathologists who are used to either clone in their clinical practice. Serial sections of tissue microarrays, built from 198 cases of resected lung cancer, were stained for 22C3 on the Dako Link-48 platform and for SP263 on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra, following manufacturer's instructions. A protocol was also developed to run the 22C3 antibody on the Ventana platform. The pathologist used to 22C3 scored consistently higher than the pathologist used to SP263 at both 1% and 50% cutoff for all assays. For 22C3 and SP263 on respective platforms, we found statistically significant differences in terms of proportion of positive cases at both cutoffs; at 50% cutoff, around half of the cases positive with SP263 would have been defined negative with 22C3 by both pathologists. Important differences were also observed, when comparing clone 22C3 and SP263, both run on the Ventana platform. The lowest differences were seen with 22C3 run on both platforms. Assays 22C3 and SP263 show important discrepancies in identifying programmed death-ligand 1-positive cases at clinically relevant cutoffs, with possible underestimation of patients suitable for pembrolizumab therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29901568     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  30 in total

1.  Non-small cell lung cancer: land of conquest for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Enrico Munari; Giuseppe Bogina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Increased CMTM6 can predict the clinical response to PD-1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Young Wha Koh; Jae-Ho Han; Seokjin Haam; Joonho Jung; Hyun Woo Lee
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  First-line immunotherapy for patients with advanced stage or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer…finally what threshold of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells?

Authors:  Paul Hofman
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10

4.  Inter- and intraobserver agreement of programmed death ligand 1 scoring in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle R Downes; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Nora Katabi; Achim A Jungbluth; Bin Xu
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Comprehensive Comparison of 22C3 and SP263 PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Routine Clinical and Conditioned Archives.

Authors:  Sue Youn Kim; Tae-Eun Kim; Chan Kwon Park; Hyoung-Kyu Yoon; Young Jo Sa; Hyo Rim Kim; In Sook Woo; Tae-Jung Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer.

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 7.  A Critical Insight into the Clinical Translation of PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Therapy in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Caroline E Nunes-Xavier; Javier C Angulo; Rafael Pulido; José I López
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Deborah Blythe Doroshow; Sheena Bhalla; Mary Beth Beasley; Lynette M Sholl; Keith M Kerr; Sacha Gnjatic; Ignacio I Wistuba; David L Rimm; Ming Sound Tsao; Fred R Hirsch
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  PD-L1 Testing in Gastric Cancer by the Combined Positive Score of the 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assay with Clinically Relevant Cut-offs.

Authors:  Yujun Park; Jiwon Koh; Hee Young Na; Yoonjin Kwak; Keun-Wook Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 10.  Selected highlights of the 2019 Pulmonary Pathology Society Biennial Meeting: PD-L1 test harmonization studies.

Authors:  Sylvie Lantuejoul; Francesca Damiola; Julien Adam
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.