Literature DB >> 29900700

Eggerthella timonensis sp. nov, a new species isolated from the stool sample of a pygmy female.

Melhem Bilen1,2, Maxime Descartes Mbogning Fonkou1, Enora Tomei1, Nicholas Armstrong1, Fadi Bittar1, Jean-Christophe Lagier1, Ziad Daoud2, Pierre-Edouard Fournier1, Didier Raoult1,3, Frédéric Cadoret1.   

Abstract

Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille-P3135 is a new bacterial species, isolated from the stool sample of a healthy 8-year-old pygmy female. This strain (LT598568) showed a 16S rRNA sequence similarity of 96.95% with its phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature Eggerthella lenta strain DSM 2243 (AF292375). This bacterium is a nonspore forming, Gram-positive, nonmotile rod with catalase but no oxidase activity. Its genome is 3,916,897 bp long with 65.17 mol% of G + C content. Of the 3,371 predicted genes, 57 were RNAs and 3,314 were protein-coding genes. Here, we report the main phenotypic, biochemical, and genotypic characteristics of E. timonensis strain Marseille-P3135 (=CSUR P3135, =CCUG 70327); ti.mo.nen'sis, N.L. masc. adj., with timonensis referring to La Timone, which is the name of the hospital in Marseille (France) where this work was performed). Strain is a nonmotile Gram-positive rod, unable to sporulate, oxidase negative, and catalase positive. It grows under anaerobic conditions between 25°C and 42°C but optimally at 37°C.
© 2017 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Eggerthella timonensiszzm321990; culturomics; genome; new species; pygmy; taxonogenomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29900700      PMCID: PMC6182555          DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiologyopen        ISSN: 2045-8827            Impact factor:   3.139


INTRODUCTION

The human gut microbiota has drawn more attention to with the advancement and development of new sequencing techniques (Gill et al., 2006; Ley, Turnbaugh, Klein, & Gordon, 2006; Ley et al., 2005). Yet, we face several limitations when using these techniques, especially when it comes to depth bias, incomplete database, and the obtention of raw material for further analysis (Greub, 2012). However, the ability to cultivate and isolate pure colonies is mandatory to describe the human gut microbiota, thus the need to develop a technique that enhances the efficiency of these two factors (Lagier et al., 2015). When talking about the human gut, stool samples are the best representatives of its microbiome since only 1 g of human stool sample might contain up to 1011–1012 bacteria (Raoult & Henrissat, 2014). Before the introduction of culturomics, only 688 bacteria and 2 archaea had been recognized in the human gut (Lagier et al., 2016). Culturomics was developed with the purpose of optimizing growth conditions of previously uncultured bacteria in order to fill the missing gaps in the human microbiome (Lagier et al., 2012a). In general, culturomics consists in culturing samples by using 18 different conditions along with isolating pure colonies for further identifications using the matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry [MALDI‐TOF MS]) approach and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Any un‐identified colonies are subject to 16S rRNA gene sequencing and a series of descriptive experiments targeting the phenotypic, biochemical, and genomic characteristics at the same time (Lagier et al., 2012b; Seng et al., 2009). Using this methodology, we were able to isolate a new strain Eggerthella timonensis, a member of the genus Eggerthella (Bilen, Cadoret, Daoud, Fournier, & Raoult, 2016). Eggerthella lenta, formerly known as Eubacterium lentum, is the type strain of Eggerthella genus and was first reported in 1935 by Arnold Eggerth (Eggerth, 1935; Kageyama, Benno, & Nakase, 1999; Moore, Cato, & Holdeman, 1971). Species belongs to Eggerthella genus, Actinobacteria phylum in the Coriobacteriaceae family and known for its ability to grow under anaerobic conditions (Kageyama et al., 1999). Moreover, Eggerthella species have been reported to colonize the human gut microbiome and have been correlated to several health problems such as anal abscess and ulcerative colitis (Lau et al., 2004a). In this study, we describe E. timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 (=CCUG 70327 [Culture Collection University Gothenburg], =CSUR P3135 [Collection de Souches de l'Unité des Rickettsies]) using a polyphasic approach by targeting multiple phenotypic, biochemical, and genotypic aspects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Strain isolation

Before stool sample collection in Congo in 2015, an approval was obtained from the ethic committee (09‐022) of the Institut Hospitalo‐Universitaire Méditerranée Infection (Marseille, France). The stool sample was collected from a healthy 8‐year‐old pygmy female accordingly to Nagoya protocol. Stool samples were shipped from Congo to France in the specific protecting medium C‐Top Ae‐Ana (Culture Top, Marseille, France) and stored at −80°C for further study and analysis. Samples were inoculated in a blood culture bottle (BD BACTEC®, Plus Anaerobic/F Media, Le Pont de Claix, France) supplemented with 5% of rumen and 5% of sheep blood at 37°C. Bacterial growth and isolation was assessed during 30 days on 5% sheep blood–enriched Columbia agar solid medium (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). MALDI‐TOF MS was used for colonies identification. When the latter fails to identify tested colonies, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used (Lagier et al., 2012b; Seng et al., 2009). On average, 10,000 colonies have been tested for each stool sample.

MALDI‐TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Using a MSP 96 MALDI‐TOF target plate, bacterial colonies were spotted and identified by the means of MALDI‐TOF MS using a Microflex LT spectrometer as previously described (Seng et al., 2009). In case of MALDI‐TOF's identification failure due to lack of a reference strain in the database, 16S rRNA sequencing was used for further analysis using the GeneAmp PCR System 2720 thermal cyclers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems) (Morel et al., 2015). Sequences were assembled and modified using CodonCode Aligner software (http://www.codoncode.com) and finally blasted against the online database of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.gate1.inist.fr/Blast.cgi). Once blasted, a sequence similarity of less than 98.65% with the closest species was used to define a new species and 95% for defining a new genus (Kim, Oh, Park, & Chun, 2014). Subsequently, the mass spectrum of the new species was added to the URMITE [Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes] database (http://www.mediterranee-infection.com/article.php?laref=256&titre=urms-database) and its 16S rRNA gene sequence was submitted to EMBL‐EBI with an accession number of LT598568.

Phylogenetic analysis

16S rRNA sequences of strain's closest species were obtained from the database of “The All‐Species Living Tree” Project of Silva (LTPs121) (“The SILVA and ‘All‐species Living Tree Project (LTP)’ taxonomic frameworks,” n.d.), aligned with Muscle software and phylogenetic inferences were done using FastTree with the approximately maximum‐likelihood method (Price, Dehal, & Arkin, 2009). Moreover, Shimodaira–Hasegawa test was adapted in order to compute the support local values shown on the nodes. Bad taxonomic reference strains were removed along with duplicates using phylopattern (Gouret, Thompson, & Pontarotti, 2009). This pipeline was done using the DAGOBAH software (Gouret et al., 2011), which comprises Figenix (Gouret et al., 2005) libraries.

Growth conditions

In order to obtain the optimal growth conditions, the strain was cultured under several conditions in terms of temperature, atmosphere, pH, and salinity. First, the strain was cultured and incubated under aerobic, anaerobic, and micro‐aerophilic conditions on 5% sheep blood–enriched Colombia agar (bioMérieux) at the following temperatures: 28°C, 37°C, 45°C, and 55°C. Bacterial growth under anaerobic and microaerophilic environment was tested using the GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems (Thermofisher Scientific, Basingstoke), respectively. Furthermore, salinity tolerance was tested by assessing growth at 37°C under anaerobic condition using different NaCl concentrations (0, 5, 10, 50, 75, and 100 g/L NaCl). As well, optimal pH for growth was evaluated by testing multiple pH: 6, 6,5, 7, and 8.5

Morphological and biochemical assays

In order to biochemically describe strain Marseille‐P3135; different API tests (ZYM, 20A and 50CH, bioMérieux) were used. Sporulation ability of this bacterium was tested by exposing a bacterial suspension for 10 min to a thermal shock at 80°C, and then cultured on COS media. Moreover, the motility of the strain was detected using a DM1000 photonic microscope (Leica Microsystems, Nanterre, France) under a 100× objective lens. Also, a bacterial suspension was fixed with a solution of 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate buffer for more than 1 hr at 4°C for observation under the Morgagni 268D (Philips) transmission electron microscope. Finally, Gram staining results and images were obtained by DM1000 photonic microscope (Leica Microsystems) using a 100× oil‐immersion objective lens.

Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) composition of strain Marseille‐P3135

Using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), Cellular FAME analysis was performed. Harvested from several culture plates, two samples were made with <1 mg of bacterial biomass per tube, and then FAME and GC/MS were done as previously described (Dione et al., 2016).

Antibiotic susceptibility

An antibiotic resistance profile was developed by the use of the E test method. The following antibiotics strips were used: vancomycin, rifampicin, benzylpenicillin, amoxycillin, imipenem, tigecycline, amikacin, erythromycin, minocycline, teicoplanin, colistin, daptomycin, metronidazole, and ceftriaxone.

DNA extraction and genome sequencing

To extract the genomic DNA (gDNA) of strain Marseille‐P3135, FastPrep BIO 101 (Qbiogene, Strasbourg, France) was used for a mechanical treatment with acid‐washed beads (G4649‐500 g Sigma). Then, samples were incubated with lysozyme after 2 hr and a half at 37°C and EZ1 biorobot (Qiagen) was used for DNA extraction according the to manufacture guidelines. Qubit was used for DNA quantification (69.3 ng/μl). As for genome sequencing, MiSeq Technology (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) was used with mate‐pair and paired‐end methods. Also, Nextera XT kit (Illumina) and Nextera Mater pair kit (Illumina) were used for samples barcoding. The DNA of the strain was mixed with 11 paired‐end projects and 11 mate‐pair projects. Pair‐end libraries were prepared by using 1 ng of gDNA, which was fragmented and tagged. Twelve PCR amplification cycles accomplished the tag adapters and added dual‐index barcodes. Subsequently, purification was done using AMPure XP bead (Beckman Coulter Inc, Fullerton, CA, USA), and libraries’ normalization was done as described in Nextera XT protocol (Illumina) for pooling and sequencing on MiSeq. A single run of 39 hr in 2 × 250‐bp was done for paired‐end sequencing and clusters generation. This library was loaded on two flowcells. Total information of 6.5 and 4.3 Gb was obtained from a 685 and 446 k/mm2 cluster density with a cluster quality 95.1% and 94.8% (12,615,000 and 8,234,000 passed filtered clusters). Index representation for strain Marseille‐P3135 was determined to be of 4.57% and 3.83%. The 576,647 and 315,481 paired‐end reads were filtered based on the quality of the reads. As for mate‐pair libraries preparation, 1.5 μg of gDNA were used with Nextera mate‐pair Illumina protocol. Mate‐pair junction adapter were used to tag fragmented gDNA, and Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to validate the profile of the fragmentation on a DNA 7500 labchip. The average size of the fragmented DNA ranged between 1 kb up to 11 kb with an ideal size at 9.1 kb. Six hundred nanograms of tagmented DNA (with no size selection) was circularized and sheared mechanically on Covaris device S2 in microtubes (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) to reach a size of 956 bp. Then, libraries concentration was set to 8.46 nmol/L, and High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer LabChip (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for libraries profile visualization. This library was loaded on two flowcells. Before pooling the libraries, it was normalized at 2 nmol/L. Samples were denatured and diluted at 15 pmol/L before loading it on a the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. A single run of 39 hr was done for cluster generation and sequencing in a 2 × 151‐bp. 5.1 and 2.8 Gb 2.8 were obtained from 542 and 274 K/mm2 cluster density with a cluster threshold of 95.7% and 97.6% (10,171,000 and 5,537,000 passing filtered paired reads). Index representation of the studied strain was determined to be of 8.53% and 9.24%. The 867,401 and 511,563 paired reads were trimmed and then assembled. Genome assembly, annotation, and comparison were made with the same pipeline as previously discussed in our previous work (Elsawi et al., 2017).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Strain Marseille‐P3135 identification

After comparing the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the present strain with other organisms, it was found that it exhibited a sequence similarity of 96.95% with E. lenta (DSM 2243; AF292375), its phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature (Figure 1). The phylogenetic analysis clearly supports that the studied strain is a member of the Eggerthella genus. Having more than 1.3% sequence divergence with its closest species, we can suggest that the isolate represents a new species named E. timonensis (Bilen et al., 2016). Typical spectrum obtained by MALDI‐TOF MS of the strain can be found in supplementary Figure 1.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree showing the placement of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 relative to other close species. 16S RNA sequences are recovered after a nucleotide blast with the database of Silva project “The All‐Species Living Tree” (LTPs121). Muscle was used for sequence alignment and Fast tree for approximately maximum likelihood sequence tree generation. Local values obtained with the Shimodaira‐Hasegawa test are shown on the nodes. Duplicated and bad taxonomic reference species were removed

Phylogenetic tree showing the placement of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 relative to other close species. 16S RNA sequences are recovered after a nucleotide blast with the database of Silva project “The All‐Species Living Tree” (LTPs121). Muscle was used for sequence alignment and Fast tree for approximately maximum likelihood sequence tree generation. Local values obtained with the Shimodaira‐Hasegawa test are shown on the nodes. Duplicated and bad taxonomic reference species were removed

Phenotypical and biochemical analysis of strain Marseille‐P3135

The strain is a nonmotile Gram‐positive rod, unable to sporulate, oxidase negative, and catalase positive. It grows under anaerobic conditions between 25°C and 42°C but optimally at 37°C. As for acidity tolerance, this strain was able to survive in media with pH ranging between 6 and 8.5 and could sustain only a 5 g/L NaCl concentration. Colonies have a smooth appearance with a mean diameter of 0.5 mm. Moreover, cells had a length of 0.7–1.6 μm when seen under electron microscope and an average diameter of 0.4 μm (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Electron micrographs of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 generate wit Morgagni 268D (Philips) transmission electron microscope operated at 80 keV. Scale bar = 200 nm

Electron micrographs of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 generate wit Morgagni 268D (Philips) transmission electron microscope operated at 80 keV. Scale bar = 200 nm Gel view comparing the mass spectrum of the strain and other closely related species are represented in Figure 3. We can observe that E. lenta and E. timonensis clearly presented common peaks notably around 4,550 and 6,640 m/z. Gordonibacter pamelaeae and Adlercreutzia equolifaciens which are closed of E. timonensis but not members of Eggerthella genus have a clear different spectrum profile.
Figure 3

Gel view comparing mass spectra of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 to other species by displaying the raw spectra of different species in a pseudo‐gel like arrangement. The x‐axis represents the m/z value and the left y‐axis correspond to the running spectrum number deriving from subsequent spectra loading. Intensities of the peaks are represented by with a gray scale. Also, the correlation between the peak color and its intensity is represented in the right y‐axis with arbitrary units. Species shown for this analysis are noted on the left

Gel view comparing mass spectra of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 to other species by displaying the raw spectra of different species in a pseudo‐gel like arrangement. The x‐axis represents the m/z value and the left y‐axis correspond to the running spectrum number deriving from subsequent spectra loading. Intensities of the peaks are represented by with a gray scale. Also, the correlation between the peak color and its intensity is represented in the right y‐axis with arbitrary units. Species shown for this analysis are noted on the left Examined traits using API20A, API50CH, and APIZYM are detailed in supplementary Table 1. A comparison of some biochemical features was done in Table 1 between the studied strain and the literature data of closely related species (Lau et al., 2004b; Würdemann et al., 2009).
Table 1

Differential characteristics of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 with Eggerthella lenta strain NCTC 11813 (Kageyama et al., 1999), Eggerthella sinensis (Lau et al., 2004b), and Gordonibacter pamelaeae strain 7‐10‐1‐b (T) (Würdemann et al., 2009)

Properties E. timonensis E. lenta E. sinensis G. pamelaeae
Cell length (μm)0.7–1.61.0–6.00.791.01 ± 0.21
Gram stainPositivePositivePositivePositive
IndoleNa
Endospore formation
Oxygen requirementStrictly anaerobicStrictly anaerobicStrictly anaerobicStrictly anaerobic
Major fatty acid9‐Octadecenoic acid12‐methyl tetradecanoic acidNa12‐methyl tetradecanoic acid
Motility
Acid from:
D‐Ribose+NaNaNa
L‐Arabinose+Na
D‐glucose+Na+
D‐Mannose+
D‐Mannitol+NaNa
Production of:
β‐galactosidaseNa
Catalase+Na++
UreaseNa
Alkaline phosphatase
HabitatHuman gutHuman gutBlood cultureHuman colon
G+C content (mol%)65.1764.2Na64
Differential characteristics of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 with Eggerthella lenta strain NCTC 11813 (Kageyama et al., 1999), Eggerthella sinensis (Lau et al., 2004b), and Gordonibacter pamelaeae strain 7‐10‐1‐b (T) (Würdemann et al., 2009) The major fatty acids content of this bacterium were 9‐Octadecenoic acid (37%), Octadecanoic acid (28%), and Hexadecanoic acid (28%) (Supplementary Table 2). As for its closely related species, E. lenta and G. pamelaeae had 12‐methyl tetradecanoic acid as its major component (Kageyama et al., 1999; Würdemann et al., 2009) (Table 1). These data allow us to suggest that the major fatty acid could be not representative to a genus. Strain Marseille‐P3135 had a minimal inhibitory concentration (μg/ml) for vancomycin of 1.5, 0.047 for rifampicin, 1.5 for benzylpenicillin, 0.75 for amoxycillin, 0.94 for imipenem, 0.25 for tigecycline, 0.016 for erythromycin, 0.38 for minocycline, 0.125 for Teicoplanin, 64 for daptomycin, 0.19 for metronidazole, and more than 256 for ceftriaxone, colistin, and amikacin. Composed of two scaffolds, the genome of strain Marseille‐P3135 is 3,916,897 bp long with 65.17 mol% G+C content. When analyzing the detected 3,371 predicted genes, 57 were RNAs (2 genes are 23S rRNA, 2 genes are 5S rRNA, 2 genes are 16S rRNA, and 51 genes are tRNA genes) and 3,314 were protein‐coding genes. Moreover, 2,524 genes (76.16%) were assigned by cogs or by NR blast a putative function. ORFans were found in 190 genes (5.73%) and 495 genes (14.94%) were annotated as hypothetical proteins (Table 2). Circular visualization of the species genome can be seen in supplementary Figure 2. The distribution of the genes into clusters of orthologous groups (COG) functional categories is represented in Table 3.
Table 2

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

  NumberPercenta
Size (bp)3,916,897100
Number of G + C2,552,69465.17
Number total of genes3,371100
Number total of protein genes3,31498.31
Number total of RNA genes571.69
Number total of tRNA genes511.51
Number total of RNA (5S, 16S, 23S) genes60.18
Coding sequence size3,459,39988.32
Coding sequence gene protein size3,446,25687.98
Coding sequence tRNA gene size3,9870.10
Coding sequence (5S, 16S, 23S) gene size9,1560.23
Number of protein‐coding gene3,314100
Number of protein associated to COGs2,04661.74
Number of protein associated to orfan1905.73
Number of protein with peptide signal49214.85
Number of gene associated to resistance genes00
Number of gene associated to PKS or NRPS140.42
Number of genes associated to virulence55516.75
Number of protein with TMH96729.18

COG, clusters of orthologous groups.

The total is considered either the genome size or the number of protein‐coding genes found after annotating the genome.

Table 3

Number and percentage of genes correlated with some COG functional categories

CodeValue% of totalDescription
[J]1675.04Translation
[A]170.51Cell motility
[K]1905.73Amino acid transport and metabolism
[L]982.96Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
[B]702.11Defense mechanisms
[D]00Nuclear structure
[Y]1915.76Transcription
[V]00RNA processing and modification
[T]00Chromatin structure and dynamics
[M]37011.16Energy production and conversion
[N]1143.44Posttanslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
[Z]992.99Signal transduction mechanisms
[W]250.75Cell cycle control, mitosis, and meiosis
[U]341.03Intracellular trafficking and secretion
[O]792.38Replication, recombination, and repair
[X]200.60Extracellular structures
[C]00Cytoskeleton
[G]972.93Coenzyme transport and metabolism
[E]942.84Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
[F]1053.17Lipid transport and metabolism
[H]100.30Mobilome: prophages, transposons
[I]651.96Nucleotide transport and metabolism
[P]1755.28General function prediction only
[Q]451.36Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism
[R]1053.17Function unknown
[S]1253.77Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
_1.26838.26Not in COGs

COG, clusters of orthologous groups.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome COG, clusters of orthologous groups. The total is considered either the genome size or the number of protein‐coding genes found after annotating the genome. Number and percentage of genes correlated with some COG functional categories COG, clusters of orthologous groups.

Comparison of genome properties

The draft genome sequence of the present new species was compared to with G. pamelaeae (FP929047) which is close but outside the Eggerthella genus and E. lenta (ABTT00000000) as the closest species and alone member of the genus for which the genome is available. The draft genome sequence of our strain was larger than that of G. pamelaeae and E. lenta (3,608 and 3,632 Mb, respectively). The G+C content was larger too (64% and 64.2%, respectively). The gene content was larger than that of G. pamelaeae and E. lenta (2,027 and 3,070, respectively). The functional classes’ distribution of predicted genes of the present genome according to the COGs of proteins is shown in Figure S3. The latter showed an identical profile for the three compared strains. E. timonensis shared higher number of proteins with E. lenta (80.76%) (Table 4).
Table 4

This table represents in its upper right the total number of shared orthologous proteins along with the percent of similarity of the nucleotides corresponding to it in the lower left

 ETGPELDDECAE
ET 3,314 9021,5439371,1641,204
GP65.13 2,027 901486613619
EL70.5665.79 3,07 9421,1461,19
DD62.4361.3462.56 1,762 864890
EC63.2363.8364.3662.04 2,455 1,15
AE62.7863.6864.3262.080.76 2,281

ET, Eggerthella timonensis; GP, Gordonibacter pamelaeae; EL, Eggerthella lenta; DD, Denitrobacterium detoxificans; EC, Enterorhabdus caecimuris; AE, Adlercreutzia equolifaciens.

Values with bold font represent the numbers of proteins per genome.

This table represents in its upper right the total number of shared orthologous proteins along with the percent of similarity of the nucleotides corresponding to it in the lower left ET, Eggerthella timonensis; GP, Gordonibacter pamelaeae; EL, Eggerthella lenta; DD, Denitrobacterium detoxificans; EC, Enterorhabdus caecimuris; AE, Adlercreutzia equolifaciens. Values with bold font represent the numbers of proteins per genome. Subsequently, DNA–DNA hybridization values between E. timonensis and other species with standing in nomenclature was of 43.6 with E. lenta, 21.2 with G. pamelaeae (Table 5). Interestingly, these data show that the genome of the strain was closer than E. lenta one and further of G. pamelaeae supporting the hypothesis that strain Marseille‐P3135 as a unique species which is close to species of the Eggerthella genus (Kim et al., 2014; Tindall, Rosselló‐Móra, Busse, Ludwig, & Kämpfer, 2010; Wayne et al., 1987).
Table 5

Pairwise comparison of strain Marseille‐P3135 with other species. GGDC formula 2 was used: DDH estimates based on identities/HSP length)a

 ETELGPAEECDD
ET100%43.6 [40.3%–47.1%]21.2 [18%–24.9%]15.1 [12.2%–18.6%]15.1 [12.2%–18.6%]13.2 [10.5%–16.5%]
EL100%22.3 [19%–25.9%]15.3 [12.4%–18.7%]15 [12.1%–18.4%]13.4 [10.7%–16.7%]
GP100%15 [12.1%–18.4%]15 [12.2%–18.5%]13.3 [10.6%–16.6%]
AE100%26.1 [22.8%–29.7%]13.4 [10.6%–16.7%]
EC100%13.4 [10.7%–16.8%]
DD100%

ET, Eggerthella timonensis; GP, Gordonibacter pamelaeae; EL, Eggerthella lenta; DD, Denitrobacterium detoxificans; EC, Enterorhabdus caecimuris; AE, Adlercreutzia equolifaciens.

Inherent uncertainty in DDH values estimation are represented in the confidence intervals.

Pairwise comparison of strain Marseille‐P3135 with other species. GGDC formula 2 was used: DDH estimates based on identities/HSP length)a ET, Eggerthella timonensis; GP, Gordonibacter pamelaeae; EL, Eggerthella lenta; DD, Denitrobacterium detoxificans; EC, Enterorhabdus caecimuris; AE, Adlercreutzia equolifaciens. Inherent uncertainty in DDH values estimation are represented in the confidence intervals.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, culturomics helped us in the isolation of a new species previously uncultured from the human gut normal flora and its description using a taxonogenomics approach. Given its 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence higher than 1.3% with its phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature, we propose a new species E. timonensis, type strain Marseille‐P3135 (=CSUR P3135, =CCUG 70327).

E. timonensis sp. nov. description

E. timonensis (ti.mo.nen′sis, N.L. fem. adj., with timonensis referring to La Timone, which is the name of the hospital in Marseille (France) where this work was performed). The strain Marseille‐P3135T (=CSUR P3135, =CCUG 70327) is the type strain of the species E. timonensis. It is a nonmotile Gram‐positive rod, unable to sporulate, oxidase negative, and catalase positive. It grows under anaerobic conditions optimally at 37°C. Colonies have a smooth appearance with a mean diameter of 0.5 mm. Moreover, cells had a length of 0.7–1.6 μm when seen under electron microscope and an average diameter of 0.4 μm. It is able to produce esterase C4, esterase lipase C8, acid phosphatase, and naphtol‐AS‐BI‐phosphohydrolase. As well, it can ferment D‐galactose, glycerol, D‐ribose, L‐arabinose, D‐xylose, D‐glucose, N‐acetylglucosamine, D‐fructose, D‐mannitol, D‐mannose, L‐rhamnose, D‐sorbitol, D‐cellobiose, amygdalin, methyl‐αD‐mannopyranoside, arbutin, escutin ferric citrate, salicin, D‐maltose, D‐lactose, D‐melibiose, D‐trehalose, D‐saccharose/sucrose, D‐raffinose, D‐melezitose, amidon, gentiobiose, D‐tagatose, D‐arabitol, L‐fucose, potassium 5‐Ketogluconate, and potassium 2‐Ketogluconate. Finally, it can ferment glucose, manitol, saccharose, lactose, maltose, xylose, salicin, arabinose, mannose, cellobiose, trehalose, and rhamnose. The draft genome of the type strain is 3,916,897 bp long with a G + C content of 65.17%. The 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences were deposited in EMBL‐EBI under accession number LT598568 and FXXA00000000, respectively. E. timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 was isolated from the stool samples of a healthy 8‐year‐old pygmy female.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None to be declared. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  The Gram-positive Non-spore-bearing Anaerobic Bacilli of Human Feces.

Authors:  A H Eggerth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1935-09       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Culturomics: a new approach to study the human microbiome.

Authors:  G Greub
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study.

Authors:  J-C Lagier; F Armougom; M Million; P Hugon; I Pagnier; C Robert; F Bittar; G Fournous; G Gimenez; M Maraninchi; J-F Trape; E V Koonin; B La Scola; D Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Are stool samples suitable for studying the link between gut microbiota and obesity?

Authors:  Didier Raoult; Bernard Henrissat
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Saber Khelaifia; Maryam Tidjani Alou; Sokhna Ndongo; Niokhor Dione; Perrine Hugon; Aurelia Caputo; Frédéric Cadoret; Sory Ibrahima Traore; El Hadji Seck; Gregory Dubourg; Guillaume Durand; Gaël Mourembou; Elodie Guilhot; Amadou Togo; Sara Bellali; Dipankar Bachar; Nadim Cassir; Fadi Bittar; Jérémy Delerce; Morgane Mailhe; Davide Ricaboni; Melhem Bilen; Nicole Prisca Makaya Dangui Nieko; Ndeye Mery Dia Badiane; Camille Valles; Donia Mouelhi; Khoudia Diop; Matthieu Million; Didier Musso; Jônatas Abrahão; Esam Ibraheem Azhar; Fehmida Bibi; Muhammad Yasir; Aldiouma Diallo; Cheikh Sokhna; Felix Djossou; Véronique Vitton; Catherine Robert; Jean Marc Rolain; Bernard La Scola; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Anthony Levasseur; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 17.745

6.  Phylogenetic evidence for the transfer of Eubacterium lentum to the genus Eggerthella as Eggerthella lenta gen. nov., comb. nov.

Authors:  A Kageyama; Y Benno; T Nakase
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-10

7.  Eggerthella hongkongensis sp. nov. and eggerthella sinensis sp. nov., two novel Eggerthella species, account for half of the cases of Eggerthella bacteremia.

Authors:  Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo; Gibson K S Woo; Ami M Y Fung; Michelle K M Wong; King-Man Chan; Dorothy M W Tam; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  PhyloPattern: regular expressions to identify complex patterns in phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Philippe Gouret; Julie D Thompson; Pierre Pontarotti
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Fredrik Bäckhed; Peter Turnbaugh; Catherine A Lozupone; Robin D Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  FIGENIX: intelligent automation of genomic annotation: expertise integration in a new software platform.

Authors:  Philippe Gouret; Vérane Vitiello; Nathalie Balandraud; André Gilles; Pierre Pontarotti; Etienne G J Danchin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Eggerthella timonensis sp. nov, a new species isolated from the stool sample of a pygmy female.

Authors:  Melhem Bilen; Maxime Descartes Mbogning Fonkou; Enora Tomei; Nicholas Armstrong; Fadi Bittar; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Ziad Daoud; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Didier Raoult; Frédéric Cadoret
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.139

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.