| Literature DB >> 29900700 |
Melhem Bilen1,2, Maxime Descartes Mbogning Fonkou1, Enora Tomei1, Nicholas Armstrong1, Fadi Bittar1, Jean-Christophe Lagier1, Ziad Daoud2, Pierre-Edouard Fournier1, Didier Raoult1,3, Frédéric Cadoret1.
Abstract
Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille-P3135 is a new bacterial species, isolated from the stool sample of a healthy 8-year-old pygmy female. This strain (LT598568) showed a 16S rRNA sequence similarity of 96.95% with its phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature Eggerthella lenta strain DSM 2243 (AF292375). This bacterium is a nonspore forming, Gram-positive, nonmotile rod with catalase but no oxidase activity. Its genome is 3,916,897 bp long with 65.17 mol% of G + C content. Of the 3,371 predicted genes, 57 were RNAs and 3,314 were protein-coding genes. Here, we report the main phenotypic, biochemical, and genotypic characteristics of E. timonensis strain Marseille-P3135 (=CSUR P3135, =CCUG 70327); ti.mo.nen'sis, N.L. masc. adj., with timonensis referring to La Timone, which is the name of the hospital in Marseille (France) where this work was performed). Strain is a nonmotile Gram-positive rod, unable to sporulate, oxidase negative, and catalase positive. It grows under anaerobic conditions between 25°C and 42°C but optimally at 37°C.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Eggerthella timonensiszzm321990; culturomics; genome; new species; pygmy; taxonogenomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29900700 PMCID: PMC6182555 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree showing the placement of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 relative to other close species. 16S RNA sequences are recovered after a nucleotide blast with the database of Silva project “The All‐Species Living Tree” (LTPs121). Muscle was used for sequence alignment and Fast tree for approximately maximum likelihood sequence tree generation. Local values obtained with the Shimodaira‐Hasegawa test are shown on the nodes. Duplicated and bad taxonomic reference species were removed
Figure 2Electron micrographs of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 generate wit Morgagni 268D (Philips) transmission electron microscope operated at 80 keV. Scale bar = 200 nm
Figure 3Gel view comparing mass spectra of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 to other species by displaying the raw spectra of different species in a pseudo‐gel like arrangement. The x‐axis represents the m/z value and the left y‐axis correspond to the running spectrum number deriving from subsequent spectra loading. Intensities of the peaks are represented by with a gray scale. Also, the correlation between the peak color and its intensity is represented in the right y‐axis with arbitrary units. Species shown for this analysis are noted on the left
Differential characteristics of Eggerthella timonensis strain Marseille‐P3135 with Eggerthella lenta strain NCTC 11813 (Kageyama et al., 1999), Eggerthella sinensis (Lau et al., 2004b), and Gordonibacter pamelaeae strain 7‐10‐1‐b (T) (Würdemann et al., 2009)
| Properties |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell length (μm) | 0.7–1.6 | 1.0–6.0 | 0.79 | 1.01 ± 0.21 |
| Gram stain | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| Indole | − | − | − | Na |
| Endospore formation | − | − | − | − |
| Oxygen requirement | Strictly anaerobic | Strictly anaerobic | Strictly anaerobic | Strictly anaerobic |
| Major fatty acid | 9‐Octadecenoic acid | 12‐methyl tetradecanoic acid | Na | 12‐methyl tetradecanoic acid |
| Motility | − | − | − | − |
|
| ||||
| D‐Ribose | + | Na | Na | Na |
| L‐Arabinose | + | − | − | Na |
| D‐glucose | + | Na | − | + |
| D‐Mannose | + | − | − | − |
| D‐Mannitol | + | − | Na | Na |
| Production of: | ||||
| β‐galactosidase | − | − | − | Na |
| Catalase | + | Na | + | + |
| Urease | − | − | − | Na |
| Alkaline phosphatase | − | − | − | − |
| Habitat | Human gut | Human gut | Blood culture | Human colon |
| G+C content (mol%) | 65.17 | 64.2 | Na | 64 |
Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome
|
| Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Size (bp) | 3,916,897 | 100 |
| Number of G + C | 2,552,694 | 65.17 |
| Number total of genes | 3,371 | 100 |
| Number total of protein genes | 3,314 | 98.31 |
| Number total of RNA genes | 57 | 1.69 |
| Number total of tRNA genes | 51 | 1.51 |
| Number total of RNA (5S, 16S, 23S) genes | 6 | 0.18 |
| Coding sequence size | 3,459,399 | 88.32 |
| Coding sequence gene protein size | 3,446,256 | 87.98 |
| Coding sequence tRNA gene size | 3,987 | 0.10 |
| Coding sequence (5S, 16S, 23S) gene size | 9,156 | 0.23 |
| Number of protein‐coding gene | 3,314 | 100 |
| Number of protein associated to COGs | 2,046 | 61.74 |
| Number of protein associated to orfan | 190 | 5.73 |
| Number of protein with peptide signal | 492 | 14.85 |
| Number of gene associated to resistance genes | 0 | 0 |
| Number of gene associated to PKS or NRPS | 14 | 0.42 |
| Number of genes associated to virulence | 555 | 16.75 |
| Number of protein with TMH | 967 | 29.18 |
COG, clusters of orthologous groups.
The total is considered either the genome size or the number of protein‐coding genes found after annotating the genome.
Number and percentage of genes correlated with some COG functional categories
| Code | Value | % of total | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| [J] | 167 | 5.04 | Translation |
| [A] | 17 | 0.51 | Cell motility |
| [K] | 190 | 5.73 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| [L] | 98 | 2.96 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
| [B] | 70 | 2.11 | Defense mechanisms |
| [D] | 0 | 0 | Nuclear structure |
| [Y] | 191 | 5.76 | Transcription |
| [V] | 0 | 0 | RNA processing and modification |
| [T] | 0 | 0 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| [M] | 370 | 11.16 | Energy production and conversion |
| [N] | 114 | 3.44 | Posttanslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| [Z] | 99 | 2.99 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| [W] | 25 | 0.75 | Cell cycle control, mitosis, and meiosis |
| [U] | 34 | 1.03 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| [O] | 79 | 2.38 | Replication, recombination, and repair |
| [X] | 20 | 0.60 | Extracellular structures |
| [C] | 0 | 0 | Cytoskeleton |
| [G] | 97 | 2.93 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| [E] | 94 | 2.84 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| [F] | 105 | 3.17 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| [H] | 10 | 0.30 | Mobilome: prophages, transposons |
| [I] | 65 | 1.96 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| [P] | 175 | 5.28 | General function prediction only |
| [Q] | 45 | 1.36 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism |
| [R] | 105 | 3.17 | Function unknown |
| [S] | 125 | 3.77 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| _ | 1.268 | 38.26 | Not in COGs |
COG, clusters of orthologous groups.
This table represents in its upper right the total number of shared orthologous proteins along with the percent of similarity of the nucleotides corresponding to it in the lower left
| ET | GP | EL | DD | EC | AE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET |
| 902 | 1,543 | 937 | 1,164 | 1,204 |
| GP | 65.13 |
| 901 | 486 | 613 | 619 |
| EL | 70.56 | 65.79 |
| 942 | 1,146 | 1,19 |
| DD | 62.43 | 61.34 | 62.56 |
| 864 | 890 |
| EC | 63.23 | 63.83 | 64.36 | 62.04 |
| 1,15 |
| AE | 62.78 | 63.68 | 64.32 | 62.0 | 80.76 |
|
ET, Eggerthella timonensis; GP, Gordonibacter pamelaeae; EL, Eggerthella lenta; DD, Denitrobacterium detoxificans; EC, Enterorhabdus caecimuris; AE, Adlercreutzia equolifaciens.
Values with bold font represent the numbers of proteins per genome.
Pairwise comparison of strain Marseille‐P3135 with other species. GGDC formula 2 was used: DDH estimates based on identities/HSP length)a
| ET | EL | GP | AE | EC | DD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | 100% | 43.6 [40.3%–47.1%] | 21.2 [18%–24.9%] | 15.1 [12.2%–18.6%] | 15.1 [12.2%–18.6%] | 13.2 [10.5%–16.5%] |
| EL | 100% | 22.3 [19%–25.9%] | 15.3 [12.4%–18.7%] | 15 [12.1%–18.4%] | 13.4 [10.7%–16.7%] | |
| GP | 100% | 15 [12.1%–18.4%] | 15 [12.2%–18.5%] | 13.3 [10.6%–16.6%] | ||
| AE | 100% | 26.1 [22.8%–29.7%] | 13.4 [10.6%–16.7%] | |||
| EC | 100% | 13.4 [10.7%–16.8%] | ||||
| DD | 100% |
ET, Eggerthella timonensis; GP, Gordonibacter pamelaeae; EL, Eggerthella lenta; DD, Denitrobacterium detoxificans; EC, Enterorhabdus caecimuris; AE, Adlercreutzia equolifaciens.
Inherent uncertainty in DDH values estimation are represented in the confidence intervals.