Literature DB >> 2989944

Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat.

N Geary, G P Smith.   

Abstract

Rats with chronic gastric cannulas were intraperitoneally injected with the dopamine receptor antagonist pimozide (0.25 mg/kg) before sham feeding 5, 10, 20, or 40% (w/v) sucrose solutions. Amount of sham intake after control injections increased as a function of sucrose concentration. At each concentration, the rate of sham feeding was greatest during the initial 3 min of sham feeding and subsequently decelerated. Pimozide inhibited sham feeding rate, and the temporal pattern of decreases in sham feeding rate after pimozide were similar to those produced by decreasing the concentration of sucrose sham fed. These data extend previous reports of the inhibitory effect of pimozide on ingestion of sweet fluids by eliminating the possibility that the effect was the result of pimozide facilitating postingestional inhibitory mechanisms. Further, pimozide did not appear to produce fatigue or sedation, or to reduce the rats' motor capacity to sham feed. Therefore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that central dopaminergic synaptic activity mediates the reinforcing effects of sweet taste that drive sham feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2989944     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(85)90528-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  25 in total

Review 1.  Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  Role of brain dopamine in food reward and reinforcement.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  A Towell; R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ginger D Blonde; Lisa A Eckel; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Altered taste sensitivity in obese, prediabetic OLETF rats lacking CCK-1 receptors.

Authors:  Andras Hajnal; Mihai Covasa; Nicholas T Bello
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Simultaneous Detection of c-Fos Activation from Mesolimbic and Mesocortical Dopamine Reward Sites Following Naive Sugar and Fat Ingestion in Rats.

Authors:  Julie A D Dela Cruz; Tricia Coke; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Physiological state tunes mesolimbic signaling: Lessons from sodium appetite and inspiration from Randall R. Sakai.

Authors:  Samantha M Fortin; Mitchell F Roitman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-11-19

9.  Reward-dependent suppression or facilitation of consummatory behaviour by raclopride.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Role of amygdala dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Sonia Bernal; Patricia Miner; Yana Abayev; Ester Kandova; Meri Gerges; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.