Swati Dey1, Deeptankar DeMazumder1,2, Agnieszka Sidor1, D Brian Foster1, Brian O'Rourke3. 1. From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (S.D., D.D., A.S., D.B.F., B.O.). 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH (D.D.). 3. From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (S.D., D.D., A.S., D.B.F., B.O.) bor@jhmi.edu dbrianfoster@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Despite increasing prevalence and incidence of heart failure (HF), therapeutic options remain limited. In early stages of HF, sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular arrhythmias claims many lives. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in both arrhythmias and contractile dysfunction. However, little is known about how ROS in specific subcellular compartments contribute to HF or SCD pathophysiology. The role of ROS in chronic proteome remodeling has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: We will test the hypothesis that elevated mitochondrial ROS (mROS) is a principal source of oxidative stress in HF and in vivo reduction of mROS mitigates SCD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a unique guinea pig model of nonischemic HF that recapitulates important features of human HF, including prolonged QT interval and high incidence of spontaneous arrhythmic SCD, compartment-specific ROS sensors revealed increased mROS in resting and contracting left ventricular myocytes in failing hearts. Importantly, the mitochondrially targeted antioxidant (MitoTEMPO) normalized global cellular ROS. Further, in vivo MitoTEMPO treatment of HF animals prevented and reversed HF, eliminated SCD by decreasing dispersion of repolarization and ventricular arrhythmias, suppressed chronic HF-induced remodeling of the expression proteome, and prevented specific phosphoproteome alterations. Pathway analysis of mROS-sensitive networks indicated that increased mROS in HF disrupts the normal coupling between cytosolic signals and nuclear gene programs driving mitochondrial function, antioxidant enzymes, Ca2+ handling, and action potential repolarization, suggesting new targets for therapeutic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: mROS drive both acute emergent events, such as electrical instability responsible for SCD, and those that mediate chronic HF remodeling, characterized by suppression or altered phosphorylation of metabolic, antioxidant, and ion transport protein networks. In vivo reduction of mROS prevents and reverses electrical instability, SCD, and HF. Our findings support the feasibility of targeting the mitochondria as a potential new therapy for HF and SCD while identifying new mROS-sensitive protein modifications.
RATIONALE: Despite increasing prevalence and incidence of heart failure (HF), therapeutic options remain limited. In early stages of HF, sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular arrhythmias claims many lives. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in both arrhythmias and contractile dysfunction. However, little is known about how ROS in specific subcellular compartments contribute to HF or SCD pathophysiology. The role of ROS in chronic proteome remodeling has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: We will test the hypothesis that elevated mitochondrial ROS (mROS) is a principal source of oxidative stress in HF and in vivo reduction of mROS mitigates SCD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a unique guinea pig model of nonischemic HF that recapitulates important features of human HF, including prolonged QT interval and high incidence of spontaneous arrhythmic SCD, compartment-specific ROS sensors revealed increased mROS in resting and contracting left ventricular myocytes in failing hearts. Importantly, the mitochondrially targeted antioxidant (MitoTEMPO) normalized global cellular ROS. Further, in vivo MitoTEMPO treatment of HF animals prevented and reversed HF, eliminated SCD by decreasing dispersion of repolarization and ventricular arrhythmias, suppressed chronic HF-induced remodeling of the expression proteome, and prevented specific phosphoproteome alterations. Pathway analysis of mROS-sensitive networks indicated that increased mROS in HF disrupts the normal coupling between cytosolic signals and nuclear gene programs driving mitochondrial function, antioxidant enzymes, Ca2+ handling, and action potential repolarization, suggesting new targets for therapeutic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: mROS drive both acute emergent events, such as electrical instability responsible for SCD, and those that mediate chronic HF remodeling, characterized by suppression or altered phosphorylation of metabolic, antioxidant, and ion transport protein networks. In vivo reduction of mROS prevents and reverses electrical instability, SCD, and HF. Our findings support the feasibility of targeting the mitochondria as a potential new therapy for HF and SCD while identifying new mROS-sensitive protein modifications.
Authors: Anna E Dikalova; Alfiya T Bikineyeva; Klaudia Budzyn; Rafal R Nazarewicz; Louise McCann; William Lewis; David G Harrison; Sergey I Dikalov Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Lars Køber; Jens J Thune; Jens C Nielsen; Jens Haarbo; Lars Videbæk; Eva Korup; Gunnar Jensen; Per Hildebrandt; Flemming H Steffensen; Niels E Bruun; Hans Eiskjær; Axel Brandes; Anna M Thøgersen; Finn Gustafsson; Kenneth Egstrup; Regitze Videbæk; Christian Hassager; Jesper H Svendsen; Dan E Høfsten; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Steen Pehrson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Howard D Sesso; Julie E Buring; William G Christen; Tobias Kurth; Charlene Belanger; Jean MacFadyen; Vadim Bubes; JoAnn E Manson; Robert J Glynn; J Michael Gaziano Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-11-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anjan K Chakrabarti; Kristin Feeney; Cassandra Abueg; David A Brown; Ewa Czyz; Michal Tendera; Andras Janosi; Robert P Giugliano; Robert A Kloner; W Douglas Weaver; Christoph Bode; Jacek Godlewski; Bela Merkely; C Michael Gibson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Alexander V Birk; Shaoyi Liu; Yi Soong; William Mills; Pradeep Singh; J David Warren; Surya V Seshan; Joel D Pardee; Hazel H Szeto Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andrew P Ambrosy; Gregg C Fonarow; Javed Butler; Ovidiu Chioncel; Stephen J Greene; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Savina Nodari; Carolyn S P Lam; Naoki Sato; Ami N Shah; Mihai Gheorghiade Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Rong Tian; Wilson S. Colucci; Zoltan Arany; Markus M. Bachschmid; Scott W. Ballinger; Sihem Boudina; James E. Bruce; David W. Busija; Sergey Dikalov; Gerald W. Dorn; Zorina S. Galis; Roberta A. Gottlieb; Daniel P. Kelly; Richard N. Kitsis; Mark J. Kohr; Daniel Levy; E. Douglas Lewandowski; Joseph M. McClung; Daria Mochly-Rosen; Kevin D. O'Brien; Brian O'Rourke; Joon-Young Park; Peipei Ping; Michael N. Sack; Shey-Shing Sheu; Yang Shi; Sruti Shiva; Douglas C. Wallace; Robert G. Weiss; Hilary J. Vernon; Renee Wong; Lisa Schwartz Longacre Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Virginia S Hahn; Kathleen W Zhang; Lova Sun; Vivek Narayan; Daniel J Lenihan; Bonnie Ky Journal: Circ Res Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 17.367