Carlos Alberto Pastore1. 1. Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP - Brazil.
Visible T-wave alternans (TWA) has been reported since 1909, being,
thus, not a recent finding.[1] However,
non-visible and far less rare microvolt TWA has gained importance because of its
association with electrical disorders and the high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD)
or arrhythmic events,[2]-[6]
being assessed in several clinical trials and population studies, such as TWA in
HF,[7] ALPHA Study,[8] REFINE Study,[9] FINCAVAS,[10] the collaborative study by Ikeda et al.[11] and the MADIT-II-type research by Bloomfield et
al.[12] All those studies have
in common the fact that they evidence the high negative predictive value of TWA
regarding SCD or arrhythmic events, with low to intermediate positive predictive
value.A specialized software is used to analyze the microvolt TWA, the beat-to-beat variability
that occurs in ventricular repolarization (ST segment and T wave) and that cannot be
seen by the naked eye.[13]-[16]
The TWA allows indirect access to the increase in the dispersion to the action
potentials of cardiac cells, a primordial factor in a sequence of events that will lead
to reentry mechanisms and ventricular fibrillation, which will culminate with SCD. A
fundamental property of its analysis is the high negative predictive power for the SCD
risk that a normal TWA test has.[12]Of the different methodologies to assess TWA, the two most used and relevant techniques
in medical literature are: the spectral method (SM) and the modified moving average
(MMA) method.[17]The SM measures T-wave fluctuations by computing the point to point differences between
128 equally spaced sites in the ST-T complex, in a series of 128 consecutive aligned
beats (having already ruled out ectopic beats and ECG noise).[18] There are 128 tachograms similar to those used in the
analysis of heart rate variability. Then, 128 heart rate variability spectra, hence the
name of the methodology, SM, are computed, and their mean is calculated. The value of
TWA is then assessed at the frequency of 0.5 cycle per beat. In 1994, the adaptation of
that technique to humanpatients was published for the first time.[19] Since then, SM is the most used method
to analyze TWA, with the widest range of applications.The MMA method repeatedly creates two patterns (models) of beats from any sequence of
valid beats, one pattern associated only with the even beats, and the other associated
with the odd beats. To clarify each pattern of the beats, the algorithm is as follows:
the differences of amplitude between the current pattern (even or odd beats) and the
next valid beat (even or odd) are measured along several equally spaced sites in the
ST-T complex. Each of those differences is divided into X equal parts (where X can be 8,
16, 32 or 64), and the contribution of the current valid beat in the update of the
standard beat is then limited to 1/X (named ‘the update factor’ or ‘limiting fraction’)
of the differences between the model and the beat. Finally, the TWA values are made
available every 15 seconds, as the difference between two representative patterns (and
continuously updated) of the even beats and the odd beats.[20] That technique has been assessed in academic studies
with good reproducibility.[21]In a study of Chagas disease, published in this issue of the Arquivos Brasileiros
de Cardiologia,[22]
patients with chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy and history of malignant ventricular
arrhythmia most often had a non-negative result of microvolt TWA as compared to those
with no previous arrhythmia, suggesting that TWA can play a role in the SCD risk
stratification in Chagas disease. That study used the Cambridge Heart software with
special electrodes (high resolution) and the SM. Its results are shown in terms of
negative and non-negative (positive + indeterminate) TWA, the latter being compared to
the former. That study emphasizes that Chagas cardiomyopathy has a true arrhythmogenic
substrate confirmed by TWA.
Authors: Euler V Garcia; Carlos Alberto Pastore; Nelson Samesima; Horácio G Pereira Filho Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Jorge A Salerno-Uriarte; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Catherine Klersy; Roberto F E Pedretti; Massimo Tritto; Luciano Sallusti; Luigi Libero; Giacinto Pettinati; Giulio Molon; Antonio Curnis; Eraldo Occhetta; Fabrizio Morandi; Paolo Ferrero; Francesco Accardi Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel M Bloomfield; Richard C Steinman; Pearila B Namerow; Michael Parides; Jorge Davidenko; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Timothy Shinn; Anne Curtis; John Fontaine; Douglas Holmes; Andrea Russo; Chuen Tang; J Thomas Bigger Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-09-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul D Thompson; Barry A Franklin; Gary J Balady; Steven N Blair; Domenico Corrado; N A Mark Estes; Janet E Fulton; Neil F Gordon; William L Haskell; Mark S Link; Barry J Maron; Murray A Mittleman; Antonio Pelliccia; Nanette K Wenger; Stefan N Willich; Fernando Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 29.690