David S Hersh1, Bryan G Harder2, Alison Roos2, Sen Peng3, Jonathan E Heath4, Teklu Legesse4, Anthony J Kim1,5, Graeme F Woodworth1,5, Nhan L Tran2, Jeffrey A Winkles5,6,7. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Departments of Cancer Biology and Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona. 3. Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a difficult to treat brain cancer that nearly uniformly recurs, and recurrent tumors are largely therapy resistant. Our prior work has demonstrated an important role for the tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) receptor fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) in GBM pathobiology. In this study, we investigated Fn14 expression in recurrent GBM and in the setting of temozolomide (TMZ) resistance. Methods: Fn14 mRNA expression levels in nonneoplastic brain, primary (newly diagnosed) GBM, and recurrent GBM (post-chemotherapy and radiation) specimens were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal. Immunohistochemistry was performed using nonneoplastic brain, patient-matched primary and recurrent GBM, and gliosarcoma (GSM) specimens to examine Fn14 protein levels. Western blot analysis was used to compare Fn14 expression in parental TMZ-sensitive or matched TMZ-resistant patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) established from primary or recurrent tumor samples. The migratory capacity of control and Fn14-depleted TMZ-resistant GBM cells was assessed using the transwell migration assay. Results: We found that Fn14 is more highly expressed in recurrent GBM tumors than their matched primary GBM counterparts. Fn14 expression is also significantly elevated in GSM tumors. GBM PDX cells with acquired TMZ resistance have higher Fn14 levels and greater migratory capacity than their corresponding parental TMZ-sensitive cells, and the migratory difference is due, at least in part, to Fn14 expression in the TMZ-resistant cells. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the Fn14 gene is highly expressed in recurrent GBM, GSM, and TMZ-resistant GBM PDX tumors. These findings suggest that Fn14 may be a valuable therapeutic target or drug delivery portal for treatment of recurrent GBM and GSM patients.
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a difficult to treat brain cancer that nearly uniformly recurs, and recurrent tumors are largely therapy resistant. Our prior work has demonstrated an important role for the tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) receptor fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) in GBM pathobiology. In this study, we investigated Fn14 expression in recurrent GBM and in the setting of temozolomide (TMZ) resistance. Methods:Fn14 mRNA expression levels in nonneoplastic brain, primary (newly diagnosed) GBM, and recurrent GBM (post-chemotherapy and radiation) specimens were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal. Immunohistochemistry was performed using nonneoplastic brain, patient-matched primary and recurrent GBM, and gliosarcoma (GSM) specimens to examine Fn14 protein levels. Western blot analysis was used to compare Fn14 expression in parental TMZ-sensitive or matched TMZ-resistant patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) established from primary or recurrent tumor samples. The migratory capacity of control and Fn14-depleted TMZ-resistant GBM cells was assessed using the transwell migration assay. Results: We found that Fn14 is more highly expressed in recurrent GBM tumors than their matched primary GBM counterparts. Fn14 expression is also significantly elevated in GSM tumors. GBM PDX cells with acquired TMZ resistance have higher Fn14 levels and greater migratory capacity than their corresponding parental TMZ-sensitive cells, and the migratory difference is due, at least in part, to Fn14 expression in the TMZ-resistant cells. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the Fn14 gene is highly expressed in recurrent GBM, GSM, and TMZ-resistant GBM PDX tumors. These findings suggest that Fn14 may be a valuable therapeutic target or drug delivery portal for treatment of recurrent GBM and GSM patients.
Authors: Nhan L Tran; Wendy S McDonough; Benjamin A Savitch; Thomas F Sawyer; Jeffrey A Winkles; Michael E Berens Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-12-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Brett E Johnson; Tali Mazor; Chibo Hong; Michael Barnes; Koki Aihara; Cory Y McLean; Shaun D Fouse; Shogo Yamamoto; Hiroki Ueda; Kenji Tatsuno; Saurabh Asthana; Llewellyn E Jalbert; Sarah J Nelson; Andrew W Bollen; W Clay Gustafson; Elise Charron; William A Weiss; Ivan V Smirnov; Jun S Song; Adam B Olshen; Soonmee Cha; Yongjun Zhao; Richard A Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Steven J M Jones; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Nobuhito Saito; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Akitake Mukasa; Mitchel S Berger; Susan M Chang; Barry S Taylor; Joseph F Costello Journal: Science Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Omprakash Damodaran; Jolandi van Heerden; Anna K Nowak; Michael Bynevelt; Kerrie McDonald; Julie Marsh; Gabriel Lee Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Martin J van den Bent; Ya Gao; Melissa Kerkhof; Johan M Kros; Thierry Gorlia; Kitty van Zwieten; Jory Prince; Sjoerd van Duinen; Peter A Sillevis Smitt; Martin Taphoorn; Pim J French Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Gaspar J Kitange; Ann C Mladek; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Jenny L Pokorny; Ling Cen; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; Gwen A Lomberk; Shiv K Gupta; Raul A Urrutia; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shiv K Gupta; Sani H Kizilbash; Brett L Carlson; Ann C Mladek; Felix Boakye-Agyeman; Katrina K Bakken; Jenny L Pokorny; Mark A Schroeder; Paul A Decker; Ling Cen; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Gobinda Sarkar; Karla V Ballman; Joel M Reid; Robert B Jenkins; Roeland G Verhaak; Erik P Sulman; Gaspar J Kitange; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sara A Byron; Nhan L Tran; Rebecca F Halperin; Joanna J Phillips; John G Kuhn; John F de Groot; Howard Colman; Keith L Ligon; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Nicholas A Butowski; Jennie W Taylor; Jennifer L Clarke; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Annette M Molinaro; Gerald M Maggiora; Sen Peng; Sara Nasser; Winnie S Liang; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael E Berens; John D Carpten; David W Craig; Michael D Prados Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shannon P Fortin; Matthew J Ennis; Cassie A Schumacher; Cassandra R Zylstra-Diegel; Bart O Williams; Julianna T D Ross; Jeffrey A Winkles; Joseph C Loftus; Marc H Symons; Nhan L Tran Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Nina P Connolly; Rebeca Galisteo; Su Xu; Eli E Bar; Sen Peng; Nhan L Tran; Heather M Ames; Anthony J Kim; Graeme F Woodworth; Jeffrey A Winkles Journal: Glia Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: Ana Alvarez de Cienfuegos; Lawrence H Cheung; Khalid A Mohamedali; Timothy G Whitsett; Jeffrey A Winkles; Walter N Hittelman; Michael G Rosenblum Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Kesavan R Arya; Ramachandran P Bharath Chand; Chandran S Abhinand; Achuthsankar S Nair; Oommen V Oommen; Perumana R Sudhakaran Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2021-03-09