Literature DB >> 24332268

Clinical management and survival outcomes of gliosarcomas in the era of multimodality therapy.

Omprakash Damodaran1, Jolandi van Heerden2, Anna K Nowak3, Michael Bynevelt2, Kerrie McDonald4, Julie Marsh5, Gabriel Lee6.   

Abstract

Gliosarcoma (GSM) is a rare primary malignant brain tumour accounting for less than 0.5% of all intracranial tumours. It has a biphasic histological composition, demonstrating both gliomatous and sarcomatous elements. In clinical practice GSM are generally managed similarly to glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, unique features including its clinical propensity for extra-cranial metastasis, distinct radiological features and possible worse prognosis than GBM suggest that GSM may be a distinct clinico-pathological entity. Hence we reviewed patterns of care and outcomes for a series of Australian patients diagnosed with GSM in the era of combined chemo-radiotherapy. Patients were identified by searching the Australian Genomics and Clinical Outcomes of Glioma (AGOG) database and the Western Australian Interhospital Neurosurgical database. Nineteen patients with GSM were identified. Of these, 15 patients were diagnosed with primary GSM and four patients developed secondary GSM after radiation therapy for primary GBM. For comparative purposes, 408 primary GBM patients were identified from the AGOG database during the same study period. The overall median survival for all primary GSM patients was 9.7 months. In comparison the overall median survival for GBM patients recruited to the AGOG database over the same period was 12.2 months. The median survival for secondary GSM patients from the time of diagnosis was 5 months. Primary and secondary GSM pose a great clinical challenge due to their rarity. Our study adds further evidence to support GSM as a unique clinical entity with a likely worse prognosis than GBM.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glioblastoma; Gliosarcoma; Primary gliosarcoma; Secondary gliosarcoma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332268     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  20 in total

1.  Prognostic and therapeutic factors of gliosarcoma from a multi-institutional series.

Authors:  J Castelli; L Feuvret; Q C Haoming; J Biau; E Jouglar; A Berger; G Truc; F Llamas Gutierrez; X Morandi; P J Le Reste; F Thillays; D Loussouarn; E Nouhaud; G Crehange; D Antoni; E Vauleon; R de Crevoisier; G Noel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Gliosarcoma: a clinical and radiological analysis of 48 cases.

Authors:  Xiaoping Yi; Hang Cao; Haiyun Tang; Guanghui Gong; Zhongliang Hu; Weihua Liao; Lunquan Sun; Bihong T Chen; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Clinical outcome of gliosarcoma compared with glioblastoma multiforme: a clinical study in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Guobin Zhang; Shengyue Huang; Junting Zhang; Zhen Wu; Song Lin; Yonggang Wang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Primary gliosarcoma with long-survival: report of two cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Zhen Huo; Di Yang; Jie Shen; Yuan Li; Huanwen Wu; Yunxiao Meng; Shuying Zhang; Yufeng Luo; Jinling Cao; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Gliosarcoma with neuroaxis metastases.

Authors:  Rui Ramos; Nuno Morais; Ana Isabel Silva; Rui Almeida
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-30

6.  Pam3CSK4, a TLR2 ligand, induces differentiation of glioblastoma stem cells and confers susceptibility to temozolomide.

Authors:  Javier Megías; Alba Martínez; Teresa San-Miguel; Rosario Gil-Benso; Lisandra Muñoz-Hidalgo; David Albert-Bellver; Amara Carratalá; Daniel Gozalbo; Concha López-Ginés; María Luisa Gil; Miguel Cerdá-Nicolás
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Clinical and molecular characteristics of gliosarcoma and modern prognostic significance relative to conventional glioblastoma.

Authors:  Deborah R Smith; Cheng-Chia Wu; Heva J Saadatmand; Steven R Isaacson; Simon K Cheng; Michael B Sisti; Jeffrey N Bruce; Sameer A Sheth; Andrew B Lassman; Fabio M Iwamoto; Shih-Hsiu Wang; Peter Canoll; Guy M McKhann; Tony J C Wang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant temozolomide in primary gliosarcoma.

Authors:  Sebastian Adeberg; Denise Bernhardt; Semi Ben Harrabi; Christian Diehl; Christian Koelsche; Stefan Rieken; Andreas Unterberg; Andreas von Deimling; Juergen Debus
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Reproducibility and relative stability in magnetic resonance imaging indices of tumor vascular physiology over a period of 24h in a rat 9L gliosarcoma model.

Authors:  Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Rasha Elmghirbi; Stephen L Brown; Lonni R Schultz; Ian Y Lee; Kelly A Keenan; Swayamprava Panda; Glauber Cabral; Tom Mikkelsen; James R Ewing
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  The TNF receptor family member Fn14 is highly expressed in recurrent glioblastoma and in GBM patient-derived xenografts with acquired temozolomide resistance.

Authors:  David S Hersh; Bryan G Harder; Alison Roos; Sen Peng; Jonathan E Heath; Teklu Legesse; Anthony J Kim; Graeme F Woodworth; Nhan L Tran; Jeffrey A Winkles
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.