Literature DB >> 29896319

Specific properties of probiotic strains: relevance and benefits for the host.

Rostyslav V Bubnov1,2, Lidiia P Babenko1, Liudmyla M Lazarenko1, Victoria V Mokrozub1, Mykola Ya Spivak1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Probiotics have tremendous potential to develop healthy diets, treatment, and prevention. Investigation of in vitro cultural properties of health-promoting microorganisms like lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and bifidobacteria is crucial to select probiotic strains for treatments based on gut microbiota modulation to justify individualized and personalized approach for nutrition and prevention of variety of diseases. The aim was to study the biological properties of LAB and bifidobacteria probiotic strains, namely adhesive properties; resistance to antibiotics; and biological fluids (gastric juice, bile, pancreatic enzymes), and to overview the literature in the field.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied six LAB strains (Lactobacillus acidophilus ІМV В-7279, L. casei ІМV В-7280, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus ІМV В-7281, L. rhamnosus LB-3 VK6, L. delbrueckii LE VK8, L. plantarum LM VK7), and two bifidobacteria strains (Bifidobacterium animalis VKL, B. animalis VKB). We characterized tinctorial, culturally morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties of probiotic strains of LAB and bifidobacteria by commonly used research methods. Determination of the resistance to antibiotics was carried out using disc-diffusion method. The effects of gastric juice, bile, and pancreatin on the viability of LAB and bifidobacteria were evaluated. Adhesive properties of LAB and bifidobacteria to epithelial cells were assessed calculating three indicators: average adhesion rate (AAR), participation rate of epithelial cells (PRE), and adhesiveness index of microorganisms (AIM). Electron microscopy of LAB and bifidobacteria cells was conducted.
RESULTS: The studied strains of LAB and bifidobacteria did not form spores, were positively stained by Gram, grow on medium in a wide range of pH (1.0-9.0, optimum pH 5.5-6.5), were sensitive to a wide range of antibiotics; and showed different resistance to gastric juice, bile, and pancreatic enzymes. The most resistant to antibiotics were L. rhamnosus LB-3 VK6 and L. delbrueckii LE VK8 strains. The most susceptible to gastric juice was L. plantarum LM VK7, which stopped its growth at 8% of gastric juice; L. acidophilus IMV B-7279, B. animalis VKL, and B. animalis VKB strains were resistant even in the 100% concentration. Strains L. acidophilus IMV В-7279, L. casei IMV В-7280, B. animalis VKL, B. animalis VKB, L. rhamnosus LB-3 VK6, L. delbrueckii LE VK8, and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus IMV В-7281 were resistant to pancreatic enzymes. Adhesive properties of the strains according to AIM index were high in L. casei IMV В-7280, B. animalis VKL, and B. animalis VKB; were moderate in L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus IMV В-7281; and were low in L. acidophilus IMV В-7279, L. rhamnosus LB-3 VK6, L. delbrueckii LE VK8, and L. plantarum LM VK7.
CONCLUSION: We recognized strain-dependent properties of studied LAB and bifidobacteria probiotic strains (adhesive ability, resistance to antibiotics, and gut biological fluids) and discussed potential for most effective individualized treatment for gut and distant sites microbiome modulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesive properties; Antibiotics; Bifidobacterium; Bile; Gastric juice; Gut microbiota; Individualized medicine; Lactobacillus; Pancreatic enzymes; Patient phenotype; Pili; Predictive preventive personalized medicine; Probiotics

Year:  2018        PMID: 29896319      PMCID: PMC5972142          DOI: 10.1007/s13167-018-0132-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EPMA J        ISSN: 1878-5077            Impact factor:   6.543


  100 in total

1.  Auxotrophy and intrapopulation complementary in the 'interactome' of a cultivated freshwater model community.

Authors:  Sarahi L Garcia; Moritz Buck; Katherine D McMahon; Hans-Peter Grossart; Alexander Eiler; Falk Warnecke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  Factors involved in the colonization and survival of bifidobacteria in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Irene González-Rodríguez; Lorena Ruiz; Miguel Gueimonde; Abelardo Margolles; Borja Sánchez
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  How do probiotics and prebiotics function at distant sites?

Authors:  G Reid; T Abrahamsson; M Bailey; L B Bindels; R Bubnov; K Ganguli; C Martoni; C O'Neill; H M Savignac; C Stanton; N Ship; M Surette; K Tuohy; S van Hemert
Journal:  Benef Microbes       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.205

4.  Precision medicine using microbiota.

Authors:  Christian Jobin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Systematic Exploration of the Glycoproteome of the Beneficial Gut Isolate Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG.

Authors:  Hanne L P Tytgat; Geert Schoofs; Jos Vanderleyden; Els J M Van Damme; Ruddy Wattiez; Sarah Lebeer; Baptiste Leroy
Journal:  J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-28

6.  Oral treatment with Bifidobacterium longum 51A reduced inflammation in a murine experimental model of gout.

Authors:  A T Vieira; I Galvão; F A Amaral; M M Teixeira; J R Nicoli; F S Martins
Journal:  Benef Microbes       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 4.205

7.  EPMA position paper in cancer: current overview and future perspectives.

Authors:  Godfrey Grech; Xianquan Zhan; Byong Chul Yoo; Rostyslav Bubnov; Suzanne Hagan; Romano Danesi; Giorgio Vittadini; Dominic M Desiderio
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus Strains with Antifungal Activity Isolated from Animal Manure.

Authors:  Soundharrajan Ilavenil; Hyung Soo Park; Mayakrishnan Vijayakumar; Mariadhas Valan Arasu; Da Hye Kim; Sivanesan Ravikumar; Ki Choon Choi
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-06-17

9.  Probiotic Gut Microbiota Isolate Interacts with Dendritic Cells via Glycosylated Heterotrimeric Pili.

Authors:  Hanne L P Tytgat; Nienke H van Teijlingen; Ruby May A Sullan; François P Douillard; Pia Rasinkangas; Marcel Messing; Justus Reunanen; Reetta Satokari; Jos Vanderleyden; Yves F Dufrêne; Teunis B H Geijtenbeek; Willem M de Vos; Sarah Lebeer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Bifidobacteria and Their Molecular Communication with the Immune System.

Authors:  Lorena Ruiz; Susana Delgado; Patricia Ruas-Madiedo; Borja Sánchez; Abelardo Margolles
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Innate immunity and oral microbiome: a personalized, predictive, and preventive approach to the management of oral diseases.

Authors:  Jack C Yu; Hesam Khodadadi; Babak Baban
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 2.  Prebiotics metabolism by gut-isolated probiotics.

Authors:  Muhamad Hanif Rawi; Siti Aisyah Zaman; Khairul Faizal Pa'ee; Sui Sien Leong; Shahrul Razid Sarbini
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Metataxonomic analysis of microbiota from Pakistani dromedary camelids milk and characterization of a newly isolated Lactobacillus fermentum strain with probiotic and bio-yogurt starter traits.

Authors:  Kanwal Aziz; Zubair Farooq; Muhammad Tariq; Arsalan Haseeb Zaidi
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Effects of the Use of a Combination of Two Bacillus Species on Performance, Egg Quality, Small Intestinal Mucosal Morphology, and Cecal Microbiota Profile in Aging Laying Hens.

Authors:  Jiajun Yang; Kai Zhan; Minhong Zhang
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Ferulic acid improves intestinal barrier function through altering gut microbiota composition in high-fat diet-induced mice.

Authors:  Baoming Tian; Yan Geng; Peiyi Wang; Ming Cai; Jing Neng; Jiangning Hu; Daozong Xia; Wangli Cao; Kai Yang; Peilong Sun
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.865

6.  Probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains possess safety characteristics, antiviral activities and host adherence factors revealed by genome mining.

Authors:  Ahmed Ghamry Abdelhamid; Samar S El-Masry; Noha K El-Dougdoug
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Can tailored nanoceria act as a prebiotic? Report on improved lipid profile and gut microbiota in obese mice.

Authors:  Rostyslav Bubnov; Lidiia Babenko; Liudmyla Lazarenko; Maryna Kryvtsova; Oleksandr Shcherbakov; Nadiya Zholobak; Olga Golubnitschaja; Mykola Spivak
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Combined Use of Bacillus subtilis yb-114,246 and Bacillus licheniformis yb-214,245 Improves Body Growth Performance of Chinese Huainan Partridge Shank Chickens by Enhancing Intestinal Digestive Profiles.

Authors:  Jiajun Yang; Kehe Huang; Jing Wang; Dong Wu; Zongliang Liu; Pengcheng Yu; Zhanyong Wei; Fu Chen
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 9.  The interplay between the vaginal microbiome and innate immunity in the focus of predictive, preventive, and personalized medical approach to combat HPV-induced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Erik Kudela; Alena Liskova; Marek Samec; Lenka Koklesova; Veronika Holubekova; Tomas Rokos; Erik Kozubik; Terezia Pribulova; Kevin Zhai; Dietrich Busselberg; Peter Kubatka; Kamil Biringer
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 8.836

10.  Microbial and metabolomic analysis of gingival crevicular fluid in general chronic periodontitis patients: lessons for a predictive, preventive, and personalized medical approach.

Authors:  Jun Pei; Fei Li; Youhua Xie; Jing Liu; Tian Yu; Xiping Feng
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.