Literature DB >> 29896310

Pre-existing anti-polyethylene glycol antibody reduces the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of PEGylated liposomes.

Yuan-Chin Hsieh1,2, Hsin-Ell Wang3, Wen-Wei Lin1,2,4, Steve R Roffler5, Ta-Chun Cheng2, Yu-Cheng Su5, Jia-Je Li3, Chao-Cheng Chen3, Chun-Han Huang3, Bing-Mae Chen5, Jaw-Yuan Wang2,6, Tian-Lu Cheng1,7,2,8,9, Fang-Ming Chen2,10,11,12.   

Abstract

Rationale: Increasing frequency of human exposure to PEG-related products means that healthy people are likely to have pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies (pre-αPEG Ab). However, the influence of pre-αPEG Abs on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox is unknown.
Methods: We generated two pre-αPEG Ab mouse models. First, naïve mice were immunized with PEGylated protein to generate an endogenous αPEG Ab titer (endo αPEG). Second, monoclonal αPEG Abs were passively transferred (αPEG-PT) into naïve mice to establish a αPEG titer. The naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice were intravenously injected with 111in-labeled LipoDox to evaluate its PK. Tumor-bearing naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice were intravenously injected with 111in-labeled LipoDox to evaluate its biodistribution. The therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox was estimated in the tumor-bearing mice.
Results: The areas under the curve (AUC)last of LipoDox in endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice were 11.5- and 15.6- fold less, respectively, than that of the naïve group. The biodistribution results suggested that pre-αPEG Ab can significantly reduce tumor accumulation and accelerate blood clearance of 111In-labeled LipoDox from the spleen. The tumor volumes of the tumor-bearing endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice after treatment with LipoDox were significantly increased as compared with that of the tumor-bearing naïve mice. Conclusions: Pre-αPEG Abs were found to dramatically alter the PK and reduce the tumor accumulation and therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox. Pre-αPEG may have potential as a marker to aid development of personalized therapy using LipoDox and achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELISA; LipoDox; PEG; Polyethylene glycol; anti-PEG antibodies; liposome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29896310      PMCID: PMC5996368          DOI: 10.7150/thno.22164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theranostics        ISSN: 1838-7640            Impact factor:   11.556


Introduction

PEGylated agents are widely used in clinical therapy because PEGylation of drugs improves therapeutic efficacy, reduces cytotoxicity, and enhances half-life. For example, modification of nano drug carriers (liposomes or micelles) with PEG provides a steric barrier preventing recognition by cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system 1, 2. PEGylation also enhances the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx/LipoDox) that is used to treat ovarian and breast carcinomas and Kaposi's sarcoma 3-5, and a PEG-micelle drug (Genexol-PM) is currently undergoing phase I/II clinical trials for treatment of lung cancer and solid tumors 6, 7. The long half-life of PEGylated epoetin beta (Mircera) was used to help erythropoiesis in the human body 8. In addition, modification of interferon with PEG (PEG-Intron, Pegasys) increased its serum half-life, therapeutic efficacy and the quality of life of hepatitis C patients 9, 10. PEG is currently the gold standard polymer for development of long-circulating drugs and is regarded as the third generation of therapeutic agents. Alongside the increasing use of PEGylated agents, generation of αPEG antibodies (αPEG Abs) has resulted in reduction of the therapeutic efficacy and alteration of the PK of PEGylated agents. For example, Ganson et al. found that 38% of hyperuricemia patients have anti-PEG IgM and IgG Abs, which resulted in a reduced half-life and therapeutic efficacy of PEG-uricase (pegloticase). 11. Ganson and colleagues reported that a patient with acute coronary syndrome receiving Pegnivacogin (a PEGylated coagulation factor IXa inhibitor) treatment developed serious life-threatening allergic reactions due to formation of a pre-existing αPEG Ab (pre-αPEG Ab)-pegnivacogin immune complex, a finding that led to early termination of the phase 2b clinical trial 12. In addition, Zhao et al. found the αPEG Ab decreased the serum half-life of PEGylated solid lipid nanoparticle (SLN) carriers by 50% in mice and beagles 13. Wang et al. repeatedly administered PEGylated liposomal carriers to induce αPEG Abs, which dramatically increased the hepatic clearance of PEG-liposome from 0.0045 to 28.5 mL/h in vivo 14. These studies all suggested that the αPEG Ab can affect the PK and therapeutic efficacy of PEGylated pharmaceuticals or nano-carriers. However, the effect of pre-αPEG Abs on the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (LipoDox) remains unexplored. In this study, we generated two αPEG animal models with pre-existing αPEG titer to evaluate the PK, tumor accumulation and therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox. In the first model, naïve BALB/c mice were immunized with PEGylated molecules to induce an endogenous αPEG Ab titer (endo αPEG). In the second model, naïve mice were intravenously (IV) passively transferred with αPEG Ab to generate a pre-existing αPEG Ab titer (αPEG-PT). The concentration and specificity of αPEG Ab in endo αPEG mice were confirmed by αPEG Ab quantitative ELISA and competition ELISA. For PK study, the naïve, endo αPEG, and αPEG-PT mice were IV injected with 111In-labeled LipoDox and the blood radioactivity was measured. CT26 tumor-bearing naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice were IV injected with DIR-labeled liposome to estimate its accumulation efficacy in tumors. These CT26 tumor-bearing mice were IV injected with 111In-labeled LipoDox to evaluate its biodistribution in different organs. Finally, these tumor-bearing mice were injected with LipoDox and tumor volumes were measured to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy. These results suggest that αPEG Ab affects the therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox and αPEG Ab could be used as a marker in the development of personal therapies using PEGylated nanomedicines.

Methods

Drug and reagents

LipoDox (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl, 2 mg/mL) was purchased from Taiwan Tung Yang Biopharm Company Ltd. Lipo-DIR (pegylated liposomal, 1'-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-Tetramethylindotricarbocyanine Iodide), ABTS solution (0.4 g/mL), ABTS [2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-PEG IgG antibody 6.3 15 and anti-IgM AGP4 16 monoclonal Ab were from Academia Sinica. Complete adjuvant (F5581 SIGMA Freund's Adjuvant, Complete) and incomplete Freund's Adjuvant (F5506 SIGMA Freund's Adjuvant, Incomplete) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Cells and animals

CT26 colon cancer cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Specific pathogen-free female BALB/c mice were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Center, Taipei, Taiwan. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Kaohsiung Medical University.

The preparation of PEGylated eβG and HSA

β-glucuronidase from Escherichia coli (eβG) and human serum albumin (HSA) were passed through a Sephadex G-25 column equilibrated with 0.1 M NaHCO3, pH 8.0, and then concentrated by ultrafiltration to 2 mg/mL. CH3-PEG5000-NHS (molar ratio protein: CH3-PEG5000-NHS=1:200) was added for 2 h at room temperature. One-tenth volume of a saturated solution of 1 M Tris-buffer (pH 8.0) was added to stop the reaction. Unreacted PEG was removed by dialysis. Protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL) with bovine serum albumin used as the reference protein. The molecular weights of PEGylated eβG and HSA were confirmed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown).

Preparation of 111In-labeled PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin

The labeling protocol was according to our previous reports 17, 18. An adequate amount of 111InCl (in 0.05 M HCl), 10 μL 8-hydroxyquinline (68 mM oxine in ethanol; Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA), and 500 μL acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.5; J.T. Baker Inc., Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) were added into a sample vial and then incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. After cooling to ambient temperature, 111In-oxine was extracted by chloroform and dried by rotary evaporator. 111In-oxine residue was dissolved in 20 μL of ethanol and added to 80 μL of distilled water and then incubated with 1 mL of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin at 45 ºC for 30 min and cooled down to 4 ºC for another 30 min. The crude mixture was purified by a Sepharose 4B gel size-exclusion column to get the final product 111In-labeled PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (111In-Lipodox). The radiochemical yield and radiochemical purity of 111In-LipoDox were approximately 20% and >90%, respectively.

Generation of mice with the αPEG Ab in vivo

We developed two pre-existing anti-PEG antibody mice, endogenous αPEG (endo αPEG), and passive transfer anti-PEG antibody (αPEG-PT). The endo αPEG mouse model (N=36) was generated by a traditional protocol developed by Leenaars et al. 19. We choose four-week-old female BALB/c mice and immunized them once a month for two months. At the 1st boost, the mice were subcutaneously injected with 60 μg PEG5000-eβG containing 50% complete adjuvant to a total volume (antigen volume: adjuvant volume = 1:1) of 100 μL. At the 2nd boost, the mice were subcutaneously injected with 60 μg PEG5000-HSA containing 50% incomplete adjuvant to a total volume (antigen volume: adjuvant volume = 1:1) of 100 μL. The anti-PEG titer of the mice was analyzed by antibody ELISA. The anti-PEG PT was developed by choosing eight-week-old female BALB/c mice and IV passively transferring 4 mg/kg anti-PEG monoclonal antibody (IgG1, Clone 6.3).

Assessment of the pre-existing αPEG Ab by αPEG quantitative ELISA

96-well plates (Nalge Nunc International, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 20 μg/mL of CH3-PEG2000-NH2 in 0.1 M NaHCO3 for 1 h at 37 °C. After blocking the plates with 5% skim milk in PBS overnight at 4 °C, the plates were washed with PBS twice. Mice serum samples at dilutions of 25- and 50-fold and serially-diluted IgG-6.3 and IgM-AGP4 antibody standards (in duplicate) were added to separate plates (50 μL/well) at 37 °C for 1 h. Unbound antibodies were removed by washing the plates three times with PBS. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated isotype-specific goat anti-mouse IgG or IgM secondary antibodies were added to the well to further detect the isotype of pre-existing αPEG in mice. The plates were washed with PBS three times, and bound antibody was measured by adding 150 μL/well ABTS solution (0.003% H2O2 and 100 mM phosphate-citrate, pH=4.0) for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm with blank subtraction. All incubations were conducted in triplicate and data is presented as mean ± SD. The relative concentrations of anti-PEG IgG or IgM in mice serum samples were calculated by comparison with IgG-6.3 and IgM-AGP4 standard curves, respectively.

Assessment of the specificity of pre-existing αPEG Ab by αPEG competition ELISA

The specific ability of monoclonal antibody IgG, IgM αPEG antibody and αPEG mice serum to bind LipoDox was evaluated using a competition-based ELISA. The αPEG-positive mouse serum was collected to confirm the binding specificity to LipoDox. Each pre-existing αPEG-positive mouse was labeled by an ear-punching system; for example, the number '3-2' represents animal number 2 in cage 3. CH3-PEG2000-NH2 with a similar molecular weight as the PEG on LipoDox was coated on 96-well plates (Nalge Nunc International, Roskilde, Denmark). The 96-well plates were coated with 20 μg/mL of CH3-PEG2000-NH2 in 0.1 M NaHCO3 for 1 h at 37 ºC. After blocking the plates with 5% skim milk in PBS overnight at 4 ºC, the wells were washed 3 times with 200 µL of PBS-T (PBS, 0.05% Tween-20) and once with 200 µL of PBS. 5 μg/mL of IgG, IgM or 50-fold diluted mouse serum were co-incubated with competitor (200 μg/mL LipoDox) and added to the wells coated with PEG for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG+M body was added to the wells (50 μL/well) at room temperature for 1 h. The plates were washed with PBST three times and PBS once and bound antibody was measured by adding 150 μL/well ABTS solution, 0.003% H2O2, and 100 mM phosphate-citrate (pH = 4.0) for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm with blank subtraction. All incubations were conducted in triplicate and data is presented as mean ± SD.

Pharmacokinetics of 111In-labeled LipoDox in mice

The mice (N=4) were intravenously injected with 111In-labeled LipoDox. The mouse blood was harvested at different times using a 1 μL capillary tube. The radioactivity of the serum was counted on a Wallac 1470 Wizard gamma counter (Perkin-Elmer) and expressed as percentage of injected dose per milliliter (%ID/mL). A sample of the 111In-labeled LipoDox injection was used as the decay-corrected standard. The serum half-life of 111In-labeled LipoDox was estimated by fitting the data to a non-compartmental model using WinNonlin 6.3 software (Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, California, USA).

In vivo optical imaging of fluorescently labeled PEG-liposome (Lipo-DIR)

BALB/c mice (N=3) bearing CT26 tumors (~100 mm3) on their right hind leg, were IV injected with anti-PEG antibody, anti-myc antibody, or saline buffer and then injected with Lipo-DIR820 (0.625 mg/kg body weight) 6 h later. The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Abbott Laboratories) using a vaporizer system (A.M. 272 Bickford). The distribution and accumulation of the fluorescent probes were measured by an IVIS Spectrum imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences) at 24, 48 and 72 h after injection. The regions-of-interest in tumor areas were drawn and analyzed with Living Image software version 4.2 (Caliper Life Sciences).

The Biodistribution of 111In-labeled LipoDox

BALB/c mice bearing CT26 tumors (~50 mm3) on their right flanks were used for biodistribution studies. Each group (N=4) of mice was IV injected with 100 μCi 111In-labeled LipoDox. For biodistribution, mice were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation at 4, 24 and 48 h (4 mice per group) after administration of 111In-labeled LipoDox. At each time point, the organs of interest were dissected and the blood was sampled via cardiac puncture. The tissue samples were rinsed in water, blotted dry, weighed, and then counted using a Wallac 1470 Wizard gamma counter. A sample of the 111In-labeled LipoDox injection was used as the decay-corrected standard. Data are expressed as the percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).

In vivo treatment of CT26 tumor-bearing mice with LipoDox

Naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PTPEG IgG-6.3 Abs passively transferred) BALB/c mice bearing CT26 tumors (~100 mm3; N=4) in their right flanks were IV injected with LipoDox (3 mg/kg body weight) every 4 days for a total of 3 doses. The therapeutic efficacy was monitored by measuring tumor volume (length × width × height × 0.5) on a weekly basis. We independently repeated the experiment twice and combined the results (N=8) for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

The detection signal of competition ELISA in Figure was defined as the anti-PEG antibody against CH3-PEG2000-NH2 molecule that produced a statistically higher signal than the signal produced from the blank. Statistical significance was calculated using GraphPad Prism 6.0 with Student's t-test. In Figures , the statistical difference between the αPEG group and naïve group was analyzed by comparing multiple t-tests. Data were considered statistically different at *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.0001.

Results

Characterization of αPEG Ab in mice

In order to generate an animal model (endo αPEG) to mimic humans who have pre-existing αPEG Abs and to evaluate whether αPEG Abs affect the PK, bio-distribution or therapeutic efficacy of PEG-liposomes in vivo, we generated two mouse models with pre-αPEG Abs (endo αPEG, αPEG-PT). Naïve BALB/c mice were immunized with PEGylated molecules to generate an endogenous αPEG Ab titer (endo αPEG). Additionally, naïve BALB/c mice were passively transferred with αPEG Ab (6.3) to generate an αPEG Ab titer (αPEG-PT). In order to measure the concentration of αPEG Ab in endo αPEG mice, the individual mice sera were collected at the times of the 1st (○) and 2nd (●) boosts. The concentrations of αPEG IgG and IgM Abs in endo αPEG were measured by mouse αPEG Ab quantitative ELISA. The diluted standard αPEG Ab and the endo αPEG mice serum were added to a CH3-PEG2000-NH2 (mPEG2000)-coated plate. The isotype-specific IgG and IgM secondary antibodies were added to the well to further confirm the isotype of pre-existing αPEG in mice. Figure shows that the pre-existing Ab concentration after the PEGylated protein immunization of anti-PEG IgG was initially 1.29±0.53 μg/mL and then 14.57±3.29 μg/mL, and that of anti-IgM was initially 0.67±0.10 μg/mL and then 0.39±0.06 μg/mL, indicating the pre-αPEG Ab isotype switched to IgG-dominant in endo αPEG mice. In order to confirm whether the αPEG Ab of endo αPEG or αPEG-PT mice could specifically bind to PEG molecules, the endo αPEG mouse serum, αPEG IgM Ab (AGP4) and αPEG IgG Ab (6.3) were incubated with or without PEGylated-liposomal doxorubicin (LipoDox) to compete for binding with the αPEG Abs, then added to a 96-well plate coated with CH3-PEG2000-NH2 antigen to measure the specificity of αPEG Ab. Figure shows that the binding ability of αPEG and the pre-αPEG Ab to mPEG2000-NH2 was reduced by incubation with LipoDox, demonstrating that the pre- αPEG Ab in endo αPEG mice specifically bound to LipoDox. Together, we have successfully established a pre-αPEG mouse model that can mimic the human condition to investigate the influence on the PK, biodistribution and therapeutic efficacy of the PEG-liposomal drug in vivo.

Influence of αPEG Abs on the PK of 111In-labeled LipoDox

To understand whether pre-αPEG Abs alter the PK of PEG-liposomal drugs (PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin; LipoDox), the naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice were injected with 111In-labeled LipoDox. The naïve mice were further injected with αPEG Ab at 5 h post-inoculation (αPEG-PT-5h) of the 111In-labeled LipoDox to confirm whether the αPEG Ab is the key factor for the alteration of the PK of LipoDox. The radioactivity of blood samples was counted by a gamma counter at different time points and the AUC parameter was used to determine the alteration of pharmacokinetics as calculated by WinNonlin program (Table ). Figure shows that, compared with the naïve group, the radioactivity of the 111In-labeled LipoDox was significantly reduced in endo αPEG and αPEG-PT. When αPEG Abs were passively injected at 5 h post-inoculation of the 111In-labeled LipoDox, the radioactivity of the blood was dramatically decreased in naïve mice. The AUClast values in naïve, endo αPEG, αPEG-PT, and αPEG-PT-5 h were 1388.07, 120.35, 88.79 and 256.51 h·%ID/mL, respectively. At the end of the observed point, the AUClast of LipoDox in endo αPEG, αPEG-PT and PEG-PT-5 h were 11.5-, 15.6- and 5.41-fold less than that of the naïve group, respectively (Table ). These results suggest that the pre-existing and post inoculated αPEG Abs dramatically reduced the pharmacokinetics of 111In-labeled LipoDox in vivo. In order to understand the blood clearance level of αPEG Ab at different time points after injecting αPEG Ab (in anti-PEG PT model), we collected the blood samples from naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT BALB/c mice and measured the concentration of αPEG Ab by quantitative αPEG ELISA. The results show that the pre-existing αPEG Ab levels in the αPEG-PT and endo αPEG group (Figure ) decreased after injecting 111In-labeled LipoDox. In addition, the pre-existing αPEG Ab level in the endo αPEG group was recovered, accompanied by a decrease in 111In-labeled LipoDox, indicating the pre-existing αPEG Abs could specifically accelerate the clearance of LipoDox in vivo.

Influence of αPEG Abs on the accumulation of fluorescently labeled PEG-liposome in tumors

In order to assess whether the pre-αPEG Ab alters the tumor accumulation of PEG-liposome, the CT26 tumor xenografted naïve, endo αPEG, αPEG-PT mice were IV injected with Lipo-DIR probe. The fluorescence intensity in the tumor region was acquired by an IVIS spectrum image system at 24, 48, and 72 h. Figure shows that the fluorescence intensity of tumors in naïve mice was significant higher than that in endo αPEG or αPEG-PT mice. The fluorescence intensity of Lipo-DIR in the tumor region in αPEG-PT mice was 3.55-, 4.76-, and 3.09-fold less and in endo αPEG mice was 2.74-, 3.15-, and 2.52-fold less than that in the naïve mice at 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively (Figure ). These results indicate that pre-αPEG Abs could significantly reduce (P < 0.05) the tumor accumulation of PEG-liposome.

Biodistribution of 111In-labeled LipoDox in αPEG Ab mice

In order to assess whether pre-αPEG Abs alter the biodistribution of LipoDox in mice, 111In-labeled LipoDox (100 μCi) was IV injected into CT26 tumor-bearing naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice. The radioactivity of 111In-labeled LipoDox was measured in blood samples, tumors and various organs collected at different times (Tables ) and is summarized as follows: (a) The radioactivity of 111In-labeled LipoDox in the blood of αPEG-PT mice was 32.94-, 22.78-, and 16.73-fold less, and in endo αPEG was 54.20-, 15.68-, and 9.86-fold less than in naïve mice at 6, 24 and 48 h, respectively (Figure ), indicating that pre-αPEG Ab accelerates clearance of 111In-labeled LipoDox in blood. (b) Figure also shows that the radioactivity of 111In-labeled LipoDox in tumors of αPEG-PT mice was 2.12-, 2.78-, and 5.30-fold less, and in endo αPEG was 9.30-, 6.13-, and 10.27-fold less than in naïve mice at 6, 24 and 48 h, respectively, indicating that pre-αPEG reduced the accumulation of 111In-labeled LipoDox in tumors. (c) The radioactivity of 111In-labeled LipoDox in the spleen and liver of αPEG-PT mice was 2.89-, 2.30-, and 1.80-fold for spleen and 1.17-, 1.11-, and 1.09-fold for liver and that of endo αPEG was 3.58-, 2.81-, and 2.08-fold for spleen and 1.31-, 1.10-, and 1.03-fold for liver in comparison with naïve mice at 6, 24 and 48 h, respectively (Figure ). The bio-distribution level of 111In-labeled LipoDox seems to be slightly increased in the liver and spleen of the pre-existing αPEG Ab mice as compared with that of the naïve group, but only spleen showed a significant difference in the statistical analysis, indicating that 111In-labeled LipoDox was mainly cleared from the spleen.

Effect of a PEG Ab on the therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox in vivo

In order to assess whether the pre-αPEG Abs reduced the therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox, the CT26 tumor-bearing naïve, endo αPEG, and αPEG-PT mice were IV injected with PBS or LipoDox (3 mg/kg/dose every 4 days, for three doses). The tumor volume was measured every two days. Figure shows that the tumor sizes of the two LipoDox-treated groups (endo αPEG and αPEG-PT mice) were similar to that of the untreated controls but was larger than that of treated naïve mice. These results indicate that the pre-αPEG Ab might significantly (P < 0.05) reduce the therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox. In addition, in order to investigate whether repeated injection of LipoDox would induce the production of αPEG Ab, the concentration of αPEG IgG and IgM Ab in naïve, endo αPEG and αPEG-PT BALB/c mice treated with LipoDox was measured by quantitative αPEG Ab ELISA. The result showed that repeated injection of LipoDox did not induce the production of αPEG IgG and IgM Abs in the naïve and passive transfer (PT) groups (Figure ).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that the presence of αPEG Ab or pre-αPEG Ab in mice alters the PK and reduces the tumor accumulation efficacy of LipoDox. In addition, pre-αPEG Ab accelerated the clearance of 111In-labeled LipoDox in the blood and tumor region and enhanced spleen elimination, resulting in decreased therapeutic efficacy. These results indicate that αPEG Ab may have potential use as a marker in the development of personalized therapy using LipoDox and help to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy. An understanding of the clearance of PEGylated agents by αPEG Abs is important as αPEG Abs have been reported to reduce serum half-life and therapeutic efficacy in the clinic. Understanding the possible mechanism of elimination of PEGylated agents may help to use these therapies effectively. For example, Ishida et al. proposed repeated injection of PEGylated liposome induced the formation of anti-PEG IgM and activated the complement system. Activated C3 fragments (iC3b) led to opsonization and enhanced uptake of PEGylated liposomes by Kupffer cells in the liver 20. In our study, we found the pre-αPEG Abs reduced the tumor accumulation of Lipo-DIR in endo αPEG mice. The biodistribution of 111In-labeled LipoDox in endo αPEG mice was 9.86-fold less in the blood, 10.2-fold less in the tumor region, 2.08-fold more in the spleen and 1.03-fold more in the liver in comparison with the naive mice at 48 h (Figure ). We found that most of the 111In-labeled LipoDox was significantly eliminated from the spleen. This may be because the αPEG IgG-LipoDox complex could be recognized by the IgG receptor on red pulp macrophages 21. Thus, preventing the presence of αPEG Abs would help to maintain the serum half-life and therapeutic efficacy during administration of PEGylated drugs. The occurrence of pre-αPEG Abs has been found to be increased in naïve healthy blood donors (pre-αPEG Ab) who have never been administrated PEGylated drugs or nanocarriers 22. For instance, Ricardo et al. first reported that occurrence of pre- αPEG Ab in healthy blood donors has increased from 0.2% to 25% over the last two decades 23. And, a recent study found healthy people have 18% IgG, 25% IgM, and 30% both IgG and IgM pre-αPEG Abs by quantitative competitive ELISA assays 24. In our previous study, we also found that 1504 healthy donors had 25.7% IgG and 27% IgM pre-αPEG Ab in serum by long exposure with PEG derivatives 25. pre-αPEG Abs were found in an acute coronary syndrome patient treated with PEGylated coagulation factor IX inhibitor that led to serious life-threatening allergic reactions 12. PEGylated-uricase 11, -SLN, and -liposomes 13, 14 have also been reported to have reduced serum half-lives or reduced therapeutic efficacy due to induction of αPEG Abs. In this study, we generated an animal model (endo αPEG) to mimic humans who have pre-existing αPEG Abs. We found that the pre-αPEG Abs reduced the therapeutic efficacy and dramatically accelerated the clearance of LipoDox from the blood in vivo, resulting in decreased therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox. Development of a convenient and specific approach to measure the presence of pre-αPEG Abs may ensure the precise use of PEGylated medicine in the clinic. Richter et al. utilized the hemagglutination assay to measure αPEG Abs in human or rabbit serum. Serum containing αPEG Abs was incubated with mPEG6000-modified fresh red blood cells (RBC) to cause agglutination of the PEG-coated RBCs. They found that rabbit serum treated with PEG-modified enzymes 26 or serum from 0.2% of healthy donors caused agglutination of the PEG-coated RBCs 27. However, it may be inconvenient to freshly purify RBCs and modify them with PEG. Liu et al. developed a double antigen bridging immunogenicity ELISA to measure the concentration of αPEG Abs from human serum samples. Human serum was incubated with hapten-labeled PEG 40 kDa and then added to the pre-coated PEG 40 kDa plate to form a bridge complex. HRP-labeled anti-hapten antibody was used to detect the αPEG-positive signals. The ELISA identified 15 pre-αPEG Ab-positive human serum samples with 100% accuracy in a total population of 350 naïve donors, indicating that the antigen bridging immunogenicity ELISA assay could rapidly and sensitively detect pre-αPEG Abs in serum 28. However, the bridging ELISA-based detection system may have the disadvantage of failing to detect low affinity or monovalent antibodies 29. Zhang et al. developed a sensitive methoxy-PEG5000-coated surface plasmon resonance sensor to measure anti-PEG IgG and IgM antibodies in human serum 30, 31; however, the high cost of the instrument may limit its wide application. In our study, we developed an αPEG quantitative ELISA system as a simple and sensitive method to measure the concentrations of pre-existing αPEG Abs in serum. The convenient approach can screen and monitor pre-αPEG Abs in serum before administration of LipoDox and may help attain optimal therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox in the clinic. The specificity and affinity of pre-existing αPEG Abs may influence the therapeutic efficacy or PK of PEGylated drug. For example, Sabine and colleagues immunized mice with carrier-free PEG molecules (40 kDa PEG-Diol) to develop PEG-specific IgM Ab, and the pre-existing αPEG IgM antibodies did not affect the PK of PEG-rASNase MC0609 32. In their study, they mention that probably the titer or affinity of these anti-PEG IgM antibodies were too low to influence the pharmacokinetics of PEG-rASNase. In contrast, we immunized mice with PEGylated protein (PEGylated-eβG and -HSA), which lead to pre-existing αPEG Ab isotype switching from low affinity IgM to higher affinity IgG (Figure ). The specificity of pre-existing αPEG Abs was analyzed using a LipoDox-based competition ELISA. The result indicated that the therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox was decreased in αPEG-positive CT26 tumor-bearing mice (Figure ). Taken together, it is important to confirm the isotypes, affinity and specificity of pre-existing αPEG Abs before using PEGylated medicines for effective therapy. The administration of PEGylated medicines should be personalized in the clinic. Choosing the appropriate PEGylated or non-PEGylated medicine to avoid binding with αPEG Abs could maintain the serum half-life and achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy in disease treatment 22. Armstrong et al. found that in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients individually treated with PEGylated or non-PEGylated asparaginase, formation of αPEG Abs was induced in 32% of patients treated with PEGylated asparaginase, resulting in complete loss of enzyme activity. No αPEG Abs were found to reduce the serum ASNase activity in patients treated with unmodified ASNase 33. Our study found that pre-αPEG Abs reduce the therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox, and tumor volume was significantly increased compared with the naïve group. These results suggest that patients who screen αPEG Ab positive should use a non-PEGylated drug. PEG alternatives such as chitosan, XTEN peptide, poly(carboxybetaine), poly(glycerol) and poly(2-oxazaline) molecules have been used in drug modification, which enhanced serum half-life and had good biocompatibility 34-37. Development of various kinds of long serum half-life treatments may be warranted for clinical use. The αPEG Ab may act as a marker to help patients choose PEGylated therapies or alternative therapies to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy. PEGylation technology is widely used in pharmaceuticals, processed foods and cosmetics in everyday life. These have significantly increased the occurrence of pre-αPEG Ab in naïve donors. A previous study has already proved that pre-αPEG Abs can cause a serious life-threating allergic reaction in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome by a coagulation factor IX inhibitor, Pegnivacogin 12. In the current study, we proved that the pre-αPEG Ab could alter the PK and reduce the accumulation and therapeutic efficacy of LipoDox in vivo. These results reveal that determining the pre-αPEG Ab and avoiding drug contact with pre-αPEG Abs is important before using LipoDox; this point should be carefully considered to prevent the influence of pre-αPEG Abs in the development of novel liposomal-based drug carriers. Further, using drugs modified with PEG alternatives will prevent recognition by pre-αPEG Abs. Accurate measurement of the existence of αPEG Abs may aid the development of personal therapy using LipoDox or other PEGylated agents in the clinic in the future. Supplementary figures and tables. Click here for additional data file.
Table 1

Pharmacokinetics of The serum half-life of 111In-labeled LipoDox was estimated by fitting the data to a non-compartmental model using WinNonlin 6.3 software. (N = 4 for each group)

NaïveEndoαPEGαPEG-PTαPEG-PT-5h
AUClast (h·%ID/mL)1388.07120.3588.79256.51
AUC0→∞ (h·%ID/mL)1628.25311.84186.64286.47
CL (mL/h)0.060.320.540.35
MRTlast (h)24.9624.3520.9312.69

AUClast: area under curve from time 0 to the observed time point; AUC0→∞: area under curve calculated from time 0 to infinity; CL: clearance rate; MRTlast: mean residence time from time 0 to the observed time point

Table 2

Biodistribution of Values are presented as percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g; mean ± standard error of the mean; N= 3 at each time point).

OrganNaïveαPEG antibody PTEndogenous αPEG
Blood50.41 ± 1.071.53 ± 0.320.93 ± 0.15
Tumor25.96 ± 3.9012.23 ± 5.782.79 ± 1.82
Spleen18.24 ± 2.0452.83 ± 8.4765.33 ± 10.25
Liver7.43 ± 0.268.71 ± 0.819.74 ± 2.33
SI14.24 ± 6.0621.08 ± 9.582.11 ± 0.95
LI1.27 ± 0.642.39 ± 0.680.31 ± 0.04
Muscle0.38 ± 0.053.08 ± 2.220.39 ± 0.27
Bone0.70 ± 0.200.99 ± 0.600.47 ± 0.25
Marrow7.11 ± 3.339.69 ± 1.1018.15 ± 1.87
Bladder1.49 ± 0.172.39 ± 0.870.22 ± 0.25
Kidney7.08 ± 0.423.86 ± 0.471.43 ± 0.14
Urine0.27 ± 0.231.01 ± 1.190.80 ± 0.30
Feces0.52 ± 0.110.47 ± 0.070.31 ± 0.11

SI: small intestine; LI: large intestine

Table 3

Biodistribution of Values are presented as percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g; mean ± standard error of the mean; N= 3 at each time point).

OrganNaïveαPEG antibody PTEndogenous αPEG
Blood19.14 ± 2.110.84 ± 0.251.22 ± 0.16
Tumor25.02 ± 7.088.97 ± 2.964.08 ± 0.55
Spleen31.49 ± 3.3772.45 ± 27.1688.75 ± 16.51
Liver10.60 ± 1.0011.82 ± 0.8011.67 ± 0.87
SI28.16 ± 5.746.91 ± 1.522.03 ± 0.66
LI3.44 ± 0.971.20 ± 0.430.93 ± 0.31
Muscle0.68 ± 0.271.16 ± 1.280.52 ± 0.07
Bone0.76 ± 0.490.73 ± 0.310.33 ± 0.14
Marrow18.76 ± 24.225.60 ± 5.5732.07 ± 20.21
Bladder1.78 ± 0.671.47 ± 0.851.52 ± 0.72
Kidney8.47 ± 1.545.08 ± 0.564.10 ± 0.33
Urine1.12 ± 0.322.32 ± 0.131.56 ± 1.37
Feces0.34 ± 0.151.03 ± 0.371.08 ± 0.72

SI: small intestine; LI: large intestine

Table 4

Biodistribution of Values are presented as percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g; mean ± standard error of the mean; N= 3 at each time point).

OrganNaïveαPEG antibody PTEndogenous αPEG
Blood9.37 ± 0.730.56 ± 0.030.95 ± 0.26
Tumor49.65 ± 20.599.36 ± 3.534.83 ± 1.38
Spleen51.08 ± 9.5692.12 ± 8.89106.30 ± 18.00
Liver11.63 ± 1.0712.71 ± 0.1412.01 ± 0.32
SI20.42 ± 4.249.07 ± 2.551.89 ± 0.34
LI3.90 ± 0.331.66 ± 0.330.65 ± 0.05
Muscle0.88 ± 0.411.41 ± 0.700.31 ± 0.15
Bone0.91 ± 0.291.17 ± 0.570.92 ± 0.68
Marrow8.64 ± 3.0718.58 ± 1.0740.33 ± 12.27
Bladder1.30 ± 0.021.46 ± 0.081.03 ± 0.22
Kidney10.24 ± 0.986.86 ± 0.296.33 ± 0.88
Urine1.39 ± 0.120.94 ± 0.831.07 ± 0.44
Feces0.71 ± 0.092.64 ± 1.751.68 ± 1.37

SI: small intestine; LI: large intestine

  37 in total

Review 1.  The mononuclear phagocyte system revisited.

Authors:  David A Hume; Ian L Ross; S Roy Himes; R Tedjo Sasmono; Christine A Wells; Timothy Ravasi
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 2.  Critical steps in the production of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies: evaluation and recommendations.

Authors:  Marlies Leenaars; Coenraad F M Hendriksen
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

3.  Anti-PEG IgM elicited by injection of liposomes is involved in the enhanced blood clearance of a subsequent dose of PEGylated liposomes.

Authors:  XinYu Wang; Tatsuhiro Ishida; Hiroshi Kiwada
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Optimization of an Anti-poly(ethylene glycol) (anti-PEG) Cell-Based Capture System To Quantify PEG and PEGylated Molecules.

Authors:  Wen-Wei Lin; Yuan-Chin Hsieh; Yi-An Cheng; Kuo-Hsiang Chuang; Chien-Chiao Huang; Chih-Hung Chuang; I-Ju Chen; Kai-Wen Cheng; Yun-Chi Lu; Ta-Chun Cheng; Yeng-Tseng Wang; Steve R Roffler; Tian-Lu Cheng
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Liposomal-doxorubicin in human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi's sarcoma.

Authors:  I Poizot-Martin; M Giovannini; R Rosello; J R Viallat; J F Sauniere; A M Dalmas; D Genre; C Dhiver; J A Gastaut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Zwitterionic gel encapsulation promotes protein stability, enhances pharmacokinetics, and reduces immunogenicity.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Fang Sun; Caroline Tsao; Sijun Liu; Priyesh Jain; Andrew Sinclair; Hsiang-Chieh Hung; Tao Bai; Kan Wu; Shaoyi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evasion of the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon by coating of nanoparticles with various hydrophilic polymers.

Authors:  Tsutomu Ishihara; Taishi Maeda; Haruka Sakamoto; Naoko Takasaki; Masao Shigyo; Tatsuhiro Ishida; Hiroshi Kiwada; Yutaka Mizushima; Tohru Mizushima
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Impact of anti-PEG IgM antibodies on the pharmacokinetics of pegylated asparaginase preparations in mice.

Authors:  Sabine M Poppenborg; Julia Wittmann; Wolfgang Walther; Gunda Brandenburg; Ralf Krähmer; Joachim Baumgart; Frank Leenders
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Control of hyperuricemia in subjects with refractory gout, and induction of antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), in a phase I trial of subcutaneous PEGylated urate oxidase.

Authors:  Nancy J Ganson; Susan J Kelly; Edna Scarlett; John S Sundy; Michael S Hershfield
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Properties of isolated red pulp macrophages from mouse spleen.

Authors:  A R Nusrat; S D Wright; A A Aderem; R M Steinman; Z A Cohn
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Subchronic and chronic toxicity evaluation of inorganic nanoparticles for delivery applications.

Authors:  Raziye Mohammadpour; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Darwin L Cheney; Khaled F Greish; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Use of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to define immunological properties of nucleic acid nanoparticles.

Authors:  Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Kirill A Afonin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Polymer nanocarriers for MicroRNA delivery.

Authors:  Chintan H Kapadia; Benjamin Luo; Megan N Dang; N'Dea Irvin-Choy; Danielle M Valcourt; Emily S Day
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.125

4.  Opportunities, Barriers, and a Strategy for Overcoming Translational Challenges to Therapeutic Nucleic Acid Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Kirill A Afonin; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; George Church; Mark Bathe
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Overcoming anti-PEG antibody mediated accelerated blood clearance of PEGylated liposomes by pre-infusion with high molecular weight free PEG.

Authors:  Morgan D McSweeney; Lauren S L Price; Timothy Wessler; Elizabeth C Ciociola; Leah B Herity; Joseph A Piscitelli; Alexander C DeWalle; Taylor N Harris; Andy K P Chan; Ran Sing Saw; Peiqi Hu; J Charles Jennette; M Gregory Forest; Yanguang Cao; Stephanie A Montgomery; William C Zamboni; Samuel K Lai
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Anti-PEG Antibodies Inhibit the Anticoagulant Activity of PEGylated Aptamers.

Authors:  Angelo Moreno; George A Pitoc; Nancy J Ganson; Juliana M Layzer; Michael S Hershfield; Alice F Tarantal; Bruce A Sullenger
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 8.116

7.  Toxicity of high-molecular-weight polyethylene glycols in Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Jia-Long Fang; Michelle M Vanlandingham; Frederick A Beland; Robert P Felton; Mackean P Maisha; Greg R Olson; Ralph E Patton; Amy S Rosenberg; Gonçalo Gamboa da Costa
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.372

8.  Dual carrier-cargo hydrophobization and charge ratio optimization improve the systemic circulation and safety of zwitterionic nano-polyplexes.

Authors:  Meredith A Jackson; Sean K Bedingfield; Fang Yu; Mitchell E Stokan; Rachel E Miles; Elizabeth J Curvino; Ella N Hoogenboezem; Rachel H Bonami; Shrusti S Patel; Peggy L Kendall; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Pre-treatment with high molecular weight free PEG effectively suppresses anti-PEG antibody induction by PEG-liposomes in mice.

Authors:  Morgan D McSweeney; Limei Shen; Alexander C DeWalle; Jordan B Joiner; Elizabeth C Ciociola; Dharmendra Raghuwanshi; Matthew S Macauley; Samuel K Lai
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Replacement of L-amino acid peptides with D-amino acid peptides mitigates anti-PEG antibody generation against polymer-peptide conjugates in mice.

Authors:  Meilyn Sylvestre; Shixian Lv; Lucy F Yang; Nicholas Luera; David J Peeler; Bing-Mae Chen; Steve R Roffler; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.