| Literature DB >> 29895845 |
Jane West1,2,3, Debbie A Lawlor4,5, Gillian Santorelli6, Paul Collings6, Peter H Whincup7, Naveed A Sattar8, Diane Farrar6, John Wright6.
Abstract
South Asians have higher rates of coronary heart disease (CHD) than White European individuals. Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important risk factors for CHD and ethnic differences in BP have been identified in childhood. Early life exposures could explain some of these differences. We examined associations of family social and economic and maternal pregnancy exposures and BP at age 4/5 in 1644 White British and 1824 Pakistani mother-offspring pairs from the Born in Bradford study. We found that systolic BP was similar but diastolic BP was higher, in Pakistani compared to White British children (adjusted mean differences were -0.170 mmHg 95% CI -0.884, 0.543 for systolic BP; 1.328 mmHg 95% CI 0.592, 2.064 for diastolic BP). Social and economic exposures were not associated with BP in either ethnic group. Maternal BMI was positively associated with BP in both groups but this association was mediated by child BMI. Only gestational hypertension was associated with child systolic and diastolic BP and this was only identified in Pakistani mother-offspring pairs. These findings suggest that Pakistani populations may have a different BP trajectory compared to White British groups and that this is already evident at age 4/5 years.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29895845 PMCID: PMC5997744 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27316-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow chart of study sample.
Figure 2Conceptual model for selecting confounders. Notes: (a) All arrows indicate that we believe it is plausible that the characteristic(s) at the base of the arrow influence the characteristic(s) at the head of the arrow. The associations that we focus on here are maternal characteristics that could be modified during or before pregnancy and their potential impact on offspring blood pressure in childhood (highlighted in bold and heavily weighted boxes and arrows). (b) This is not a complete graph of all plausible relations between all of the characteristics shown; it is an illustration of our conceptual model used to decide what to consider for each of the maternal early life risk factors (the first 4 left side boxes) for child BP that we considered to be confounders (i.e. influencing the risk factor and child BP). Thus, for e.g. for maternal smoking in the best confounder adjusted model we adjusted for maternal parity, age at delivery, education and family housing tenure and receipt of benefits, but not other characteristics.
Covariables adjusted for in each model.
| Risk factors | Covariables adjusted for* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 - as Model 1 with additional adjustment for: | Model 3 - as Model 2 with additional adjustment for: | Model 4 - as in Model last model in row plus | |
| Maternal education | Child sex | Child BMI at age when BP measured | ||
| Family housing tenure | Child sex | Child BMI at age when BP measured | ||
| Family receipt of benefits | Child sex | Child BMI at age when BP measured | ||
| Maternal BMI | Child sex | Maternal age at delivery | Child BMI at age when BP measured | |
| Maternal pregnancy smoking | Child sex | Maternal age at delivery | Child BMI at age when BP measured | |
| Maternal fasting & postload glucose | Child sex | Maternal age at delivery | Maternal BMI | Child BMI at age when BP measured |
| GDM | Child sex | Maternal age at delivery | Maternal BMI | Child BMI at age when BP measured |
| Maternal HDP | Child sex | Maternal age at delivery | Maternal BMI | Child BMI at age when BP measured |
*Models 1 to 3 are confounder adjusted models (though we note that child sex and age at BP measurement are not confounders; these were adjusted for to reduce BP variability). Confounders are defined as characteristics that could influence the risk factor of interest and child BP. Model 4 is an attempt to explore whether child BMI mediates any associations of early life risk factors with child BP. For this model child BMI is added to the most complete confounder adjusted model (i.e. the last one in the row for each risk factor). Figure 2 shows our conceptual model for determining which factors to consider confounders.
Distributions of maternal and offspring characteristics stratified by ethnicity.
| Characteristic | All | White British | Pakistani origin | p-value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age at delivery | 27.44 | 27.15 | 27.70 | 0.003 |
|
| ||||
| 0 | 1349 (39) | 763 (46) | 586 (32) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| 5 GCSEs or less | 1940 (55.94) | 895 (54.44) | 1045 (57.29) | 0.091 |
|
| ||||
|
| 2276 (65.63) | 924 (56.20) | 1352 (74.12) | <0.001 |
| Receipt of benefits n (%) | 1467 (42.30) | 609 (37.04) | 858 (40.47) | <0.001 |
| Maternal BMI (kg/m2) mean (sd) | 26.01 (5.71) | 26.75 (5.97) | 25.36 (5.39) | <0.001 |
| Smoked in pregnancy n (%) | 613 (17.68) | 548 (33.33) | 65 (3.06) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
| 4.50 (0.52) | 4.40 (0.43) | 4.59 (0.57) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| n (%) | 259 (7.47) | 80 (4.87) | 179 (9.81) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
| 263 (7.58) | 182 (11.07) | 81 (4.44) | <0.001 |
| Child Height (cm) | 108.41 | 108.09 | 108.69 | <0.000 |
| Child Weight (kg) | 18.98 | 19.09 | 18.89 | 0.054 |
| Child BMI (kg/m2) | 16.08 | 16.28 | 15.90 | <0.001 |
| Child systolic BP | 97.86 | 97.94 | 97.79 | 0.679 |
| Child diastolic BP | 61.24 | 60.51 | 61.90 | <0.001 |
*Difference between White British and Pakistan.
Figure 3Associations between family social and economic exposures and offspring BP at age 4/5 (Model 1). ●White British ▲Pakistani. *Model 1: Adjusted for sex; age at measurement. Values are differences in means (95% CI) of outcome per maternal exposure unit or category.
Figure 4Associations between maternal pregnancy characteristics (BMI and smoking) and offspring BP at age 4/5 (Models 1 and 2). ●White British ▲Pakistani Filled shapes on graph (○): model 1; Clear dots on graph (●): model 2. *Model 1: Adjusted for sex; age at measurement; *Model 2: Adjusted for sex; age at measurement; maternal age; parity; maternal education; family housing tenure; family receipt of benefits. Maternal BMI model 2 additionally adjusted for smoking in pregnancy. Values are differences in means (95% CI) of outcome per maternal exposure unit or category, maternal BMI is difference in means per 5 kg/m2.
Figure 5Associations between maternal pregnancy characteristics (glycaemia and HDP) and offspring BMI at age 4/5 (Models 1 and 2). ●White British ▲Pakistani. Filled shapes on graph (○): model 1; Clear dots on graph (●): model 2. *Model 1: Adjusted for sex; age at measurement; *Model 2: Adjusted for sex; age at measurement; maternal age; parity; smoking in pregnancy; maternal education; family housing tenure; family receipt of benefits. Values are differences in means (95% CI) of outcome per maternal exposure unit or category.