Karen A Cadoo1, Peter A Kaufman2, Andrew D Seidman3, Cassandra Chang4, Dongyuan Xing5, Tiffany A Traina3. 1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Electronic address: cadook@mskcc.org. 2. Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. 3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. 4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 5. Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eribulin has significantly improved overall survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer who received ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease. This trial assessed eribulin as adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, stage I to III breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 provided intravenously on day 1 of each 14-day cycle for 4 cycles, with pegfilgrastim on day 2, followed by 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 provided intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. There were 2 cohorts, as follows: cohort 1: no prophylactic growth factor with eribulin (allowed at physician's discretion only); cohort 2: prophylactic filgrastim with eribulin. The primary end point was feasibility, defined as the percentage of patients who completed the eribulin portion of the regimen without a dose omission, delay, or reduction due to an eribulin-related adverse event. Relative dose intensity of eribulin and toxicities are summarized by cohort. Exploratory end points included 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (cohort 1, n = 55; cohort 2, n = 26) entered the treatment phase; 88% completed treatment. Feasibility was 72.9 % (90% confidence interval, 60.4, 83.2) in cohort 1 and 60.0% (90% confidence interval, 41.7, 76.4) in cohort 2. The most frequent eribulin-related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (75.9%), peripheral neuropathy (54.4%), nausea (39.2%), neutropenia (35.4% [31.5% of patients in cohort 1; 44.0% in cohort 2]), and arthralgia (26.6%). CONCLUSION: The primary end point of > 80% feasibility was not met. No unexpected adverse events were observed, and 62% of patients received full dosing with no dose delay or reduction. Further investigation of this regimen with alternative dosing schedules or use of growth factors could be considered.
BACKGROUND:Eribulin has significantly improved overall survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer who received ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease. This trial assessed eribulin as adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, stage I to III breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 provided intravenously on day 1 of each 14-day cycle for 4 cycles, with pegfilgrastim on day 2, followed by 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 provided intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. There were 2 cohorts, as follows: cohort 1: no prophylactic growth factor with eribulin (allowed at physician's discretion only); cohort 2: prophylactic filgrastim with eribulin. The primary end point was feasibility, defined as the percentage of patients who completed the eribulin portion of the regimen without a dose omission, delay, or reduction due to an eribulin-related adverse event. Relative dose intensity of eribulin and toxicities are summarized by cohort. Exploratory end points included 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (cohort 1, n = 55; cohort 2, n = 26) entered the treatment phase; 88% completed treatment. Feasibility was 72.9 % (90% confidence interval, 60.4, 83.2) in cohort 1 and 60.0% (90% confidence interval, 41.7, 76.4) in cohort 2. The most frequent eribulin-related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (75.9%), peripheral neuropathy (54.4%), nausea (39.2%), neutropenia (35.4% [31.5% of patients in cohort 1; 44.0% in cohort 2]), and arthralgia (26.6%). CONCLUSION: The primary end point of > 80% feasibility was not met. No unexpected adverse events were observed, and 62% of patients received full dosing with no dose delay or reduction. Further investigation of this regimen with alternative dosing schedules or use of growth factors could be considered.
Authors: Javier Cortes; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; David Loesch; Joanne L Blum; Linda T Vahdat; Katarina Petrakova; Philippe Chollet; Alexey Manikas; Veronique Diéras; Thierry Delozier; Vladimir Vladimirov; Fatima Cardoso; Han Koh; Philippe Bougnoux; Corina E Dutcus; Seth Seegobin; Denis Mir; Nicole Meneses; Jantien Wanders; Chris Twelves Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mary Ann Jordan; Kathryn Kamath; Tapas Manna; Tatiana Okouneva; Herbert P Miller; Celia Davis; Bruce A Littlefield; Leslie Wilson Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Shannon Puhalla; Ewa Mrozek; Donn Young; Susan Ottman; Anne McVey; Kari Kendra; Nancy J Merriman; Mark Knapp; Taral Patel; Mark E Thompson; James F Maher; Timothy D Moore; Charles L Shapiro Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: I Craig Henderson; Donald A Berry; George D Demetri; Constance T Cirrincione; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; James N Ingle; M Robert Cooper; Daniel F Hayes; Katherine H Tkaczuk; Gini Fleming; James F Holland; David B Duggan; John T Carpenter; Emil Frei; Richard L Schilsky; William C Wood; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tatiana Okouneva; Olga Azarenko; Leslie Wilson; Bruce A Littlefield; Mary Ann Jordan Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Linda T Vahdat; Agustin A Garcia; Charles Vogel; Christine Pellegrino; Deborah L Lindquist; Nicholas Iannotti; Prashanth Gopalakrishna; Joseph A Sparano Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kristi McIntyre; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Lee Schwartzberg; Stefan Glück; Erhan Berrak; James X Song; David Cox; Linda T Vahdat Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Serena Di Cosimo; Nicla La Verde; Anna Moretti; Marina Elena Cazzaniga; Daniele Generali; Giulia Valeria Bianchi; Luigi Mariani; Valter Torri; Flavio Crippa; Biagio Paolini; Gianfranco Scaperrotta; Maria Carmen De Santis; Massimo Di Nicola; Giovanni Apolone; Alessandro Gulino; Claudio Tripodo; Mario Paolo Colombo; Secondo Folli; Filippo de Braud Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bora Lim; Juhee Song; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Kimberly B Koenig; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Joe E Ensor; Jill Schwartz Gomez; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Abigail S Caudle; Simona F Shaitelman; Gary J Whitman; Vicente Valero Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 5.837