J Bines1, H Earl2, A C Buzaid3, E D Saad4. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil jose_bines@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK. 3. Centro Oncológico Antonio Ermírio de Moraes, São Paulo. 4. Dendrix Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the risks of recurrence and breast cancer mortality, and neoadjuvant treatment leads to equivalent long-term outcomes. A large number of clinical trials have attempted to refine systemic therapeutic strategies in early breast cancer, but little attention has been paid to the sequence of anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on preclinical observations, there is limited rationale to administer the taxane before the anthracycline. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the American Society of Clinical Oncology website, and clinicaltrials.gov with the goal of identifying published or ongoing studies that aimed at comparing reverse sequences of anthracyclines and taxanes. Given the nature and the small number of studies identified, we did not attempt to quantitatively pool the study results. RESULTS: We retrieved seven studies in the adjuvant setting and eight in the neoadjuvant setting: 10 randomized trials (only 2 were phase IIII), 3 retrospective studies, and 2 ongoing phase II trials. A total of nearly 5000 patients were included in such studies. None of the clinical trials has shown disadvantages in terms of efficacy or toxicity for sequences in which the taxane was administered first. In the neoadjuvant setting, studies have collectively shown similar or increased pathological complete response rates for sequences in which the taxane was administered first. CONCLUSION: Given the available information, there seems to be sufficient evidence to suggest that a taxane followed by an anthracycline is a sequence option that can be incorporated into daily clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: In early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the risks of recurrence and breast cancer mortality, and neoadjuvant treatment leads to equivalent long-term outcomes. A large number of clinical trials have attempted to refine systemic therapeutic strategies in early breast cancer, but little attention has been paid to the sequence of anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on preclinical observations, there is limited rationale to administer the taxane before the anthracycline. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the American Society of Clinical Oncology website, and clinicaltrials.gov with the goal of identifying published or ongoing studies that aimed at comparing reverse sequences of anthracyclines and taxanes. Given the nature and the small number of studies identified, we did not attempt to quantitatively pool the study results. RESULTS: We retrieved seven studies in the adjuvant setting and eight in the neoadjuvant setting: 10 randomized trials (only 2 were phase IIII), 3 retrospective studies, and 2 ongoing phase II trials. A total of nearly 5000 patients were included in such studies. None of the clinical trials has shown disadvantages in terms of efficacy or toxicity for sequences in which the taxane was administered first. In the neoadjuvant setting, studies have collectively shown similar or increased pathological complete response rates for sequences in which the taxane was administered first. CONCLUSION: Given the available information, there seems to be sufficient evidence to suggest that a taxane followed by an anthracycline is a sequence option that can be incorporated into daily clinical practice.
Authors: Karen A Cadoo; Peter A Kaufman; Andrew D Seidman; Cassandra Chang; Dongyuan Xing; Tiffany A Traina Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Soo Youn Bae; Ku Sang Kim; Jeong-Soo Kim; Sae Byul Lee; Byeong-Woo Park; Seok Won Lee; Hyouk Jin Lee; Hong Kyu Kim; Ji-Young You; Seung Pil Jung Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 3.588