| Literature DB >> 29895300 |
Julian K Christians1, Kendra I Lennie2, Maria F Huicochea Munoz2, Nimrat Binning2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 (PAPP-A2) is consistently upregulated in the placentae of pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. The causes and significance of this upregulation remain unknown, but it has been hypothesized that it is a compensatory response to improve placental growth and development. We predicted that, if the upregulation of PAPP-A2 in pregnancy complications reflects a compensatory response, then deletion of Pappa2 in mice would exacerbate the effects of a gene deletion previously reported to impair placental development: deficiency of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9).Entities:
Keywords: Insulin-like growth factor; Intrauterine growth restriction; Matrix metalloproteinase; Placenta; Preeclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy associated plasma protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29895300 PMCID: PMC5996520 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0376-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Mmp9 crosses performed in experiments
| Mating type | Female MMP9 genotype | Male MMP9 genotype |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | −/− | −/− |
| 1 | −/− | +/− |
| 2 | +/− | −/− |
| 3 | +/− | +/− |
| 4 | +/+ | +/+ |
Each type of Mmp9 cross included either no functional Pappa2 alleles (Pappa2 x Pappa2) or at least one functional Pappa2 (achieved with various combinations of female and male genotype)
Effects of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on fertility including F2 and BC females, i.e., females collected at G16 or G18
| No wild-type | At least one wild-type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 | 2–4 | 0–1 | 2–4 | |
| # matings for pregnancya | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
| # females that became pregnant | 11 | 16 | 19 | 17 |
| # females that did not become pregnant | 2 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| # females with no failed matingsb | 9 | 18 | 18 | 19 |
| # females with failed matingb | 4 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
aLeast-squares means ± standard error from a general linear model including Mmp9 mating type, whether mating had any wild-type Pappa2 alleles, and the interaction between these two terms
bA failed mating was defined as when a vaginal plug was detected following mating, but pregnancy did not develop; this analysis includes females that subsequently became pregnant, and those that never became pregnant
Fig. 1Effect of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on the number of fetuses, including females collected at either G16 or G18
Effects of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on average fetal mass and average placental mass
| Term in model | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Number of fetuses | ||||||
| G16 | ||||||||
| F1,36 | P | F1,36 | P | F1,36 | P | F1,36 | P | |
| Average fetal mass | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.04 | 0.84 | 6.51 | 0.02 |
| Average placental mass | 3.50 | 0.07 | 0.82 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 10.76 | 0.002 |
| G18 | ||||||||
| F1,15 | P | F1,15 | P | F1,15 | P | F1,15 | P | |
| Average fetal mass | 3.41 | 0.08 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.86 | 2.08 | 0.17 |
| Average placental mass | 0.61 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.31 |
Statistics are from general linear models including effects of Mmp9 deletion (mating types 0 and 1 compared with others), Pappa2 deletion (whether the cross included at least one functional Pappa2 allele or not), the interaction between these two factors, and the number of fetuses as a covariate
Fig. 2Effect of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on fetal weight at G16 (upper panels) and G18 (lower panels)
Effects of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on fetal mass and placental mass in pregnancies segregating for Mmp9
| Term in model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Number of fetuses | Sex of fetus | |||||||
| G16 | ||||||||||
| F1,16 | P | F1,18 | P | F1,16 | P | F1,18 | P | F1,15 | P | |
| Fetal mass | 9.69 | 0.007 | 0.07 | 0.80 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 2.97 | 0.10 | 14.72 | 0.002 |
| Placental mass | 12.63 | 0.003 | 0.06 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 5.12 | 0.04 | 31.08 | 0.0001 |
| G18 | ||||||||||
| F1,10 | P | F1,11 | P | F1,10 | P | F1,11 | P | F1,11 | P | |
| Fetal mass | 9.53 | 0.012 | 0.59 | 0.46 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 7.24 | 0.02 | 1.06 | 0.32 |
| Placental mass | 0.81 | 0.39 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 1.26 | 0.29 | 4.49 | 0.06 | 17.82 | 0.0014 |
These analyses included multiple conceptuses per dam, and so statistics are from repeated measures analyses (with dam as a random factor), including effects of Mmp9 genotype of conceptus (Mmp9 vs. Mmp9 and Mmp9), Pappa2 deletion (whether the cross included at least one functional Pappa2 allele or not), the interaction between these two factors, fetal sex, and the number of fetuses as a covariate
Fig. 3Effect of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on fetal weight at G16 (left) and G18 (right) in pregnancies segregating at Mmp9. Open symbols are Mmp9 fetuses and solid symbols are their Mmp9 and Mmp9 siblings. Error bars are pooled per Mmp9 genotype (i.e., pooling Pappa2 genotype)
Effects of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on the areas of the labyrinth, junctional zone and decidua, either in absolute terms, or as a percentage of total area
| Term in model | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Sex of fetus | ||||||
| F2,28 | P | F1,28 | P | F2,28 | P | F1,20 | P | |
| Absolute | ||||||||
| Labyrinth | 0.20 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.64 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.75 |
| Junctional Zone | 0.38 | 0.69 | 1.93 | 0.18 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 14.76 | 0.001b |
| Decidua | 3.17 | 0.06 | 7.89 | 0.01 | 2.62 | 0.09 | 2.90 | 0.10 |
| Percentage of total | ||||||||
| Labyrinth | 1.15 | 0.33 | 6.89 | 0.01 | 1.80 | 0.18 | 15.01 | 0.001b |
| Junctional Zone | 1.41 | 0.26 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 11.63 | 0.003b |
| Decidua | 4.10 | 0.03 | 6.97 | 0.01 | 3.96 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
These analyses included multiple conceptuses per dam, and so statistics are from repeated measures analyses (with dam as a random factor), including effects of Mmp9 group, Pappa2 deletion (whether the cross included at least one functional Pappa2 allele or not), the interaction between these two factors, and fetal sex
aIn these analyses, there were three Mmp9 groups: Mmp9 placentae from Mmp9 dams, Mmp9 placentae from Mmp9 dams, and Mmp9 placentae from Mmp9 dams
bArea of the junctional zone, both absolute and as a percentage of the total area, was larger in males than females, while the area of the labyrinth as a percentage of the total was smaller in males
Fig. 4Effect of Mmp9 and Pappa2 deletion on the areas of the labyrinth, junctional zone and decidua in absolute terms (upper panels) and as a percentage of the total area (lower panels). Open symbols are pregnancies without a functional Pappa2 allele and solid symbols are pregnancies with at least one functional Pappa2 allele. Error bars are from repeated measures analyses (with dam as a random factor), including effects of Mmp9 group, Pappa2 deletion, the interaction between these two factors, and fetal sex
Fig. 5Representative images of G16 placental sections from Mmp9 placentae from Mmp9 dams and Mmp9 placentae from Mmp9 dams, with and without Pappa2, showing the outlined labyrinth (L), junctional zone (J) and decidua (D). All placentae are from female fetuses
Fig. 6Relationship between number of fetuses and VEGF levels in the maternal circulation of Mmp9 dams (open symbols) and Mmp9 dams (solid symbols) at G16. All pregnancies have at least one functional copy of Pappa2