Literature DB >> 29894722

Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular correlation of neural crest transcription factor SOX10 expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma.

Aparna Harbhajanka1, Satyapal Chahar2, Kristy Miskimen3, Paula Silverman4, Lyndsay Harris5, Nicole Williams6, Vinay Varadan7, Hannah Gilmore2.   

Abstract

The transcription factor SOX10 mediates the differentiation of neural crest-derived cells, and SOX10 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used primarily for the diagnosis of melanoma. SOX10 expression has been previously documented in benign breast myoepithelial cells. However there is limited literature on its expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC). The aim was to study the clinical, pathologic and molecular profiles of SOX10+ tumors in TNBC. Tissue microarrays of TNBC were evaluated for SOX10 expression in 48 cases. SOX10 expression was correlated with clinical and pathologic features such as age, grade, and stage. Gene expression was analyzed on RNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens with Affymetrix 2.0 HTA. Co-expression of SOX10 with androgen receptor (AR), WT1, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), mammaglobin, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), CK5/6 and GATA transcription factor 3 (GATA3) were also assessed. The mean age was 59.38 (range, 28-90 years). Overall, 37.5% cases (18/48) were SOX10+. There was no association between SOX10 expression and age, grade or stage of patients; 6 of 10 (60%) cases of basal-like 1 (BL1), and 5 of 8 cases of unstable (UNS) molecular subtype were SOX10+. One of 5 basal-like-2 (BL2), 1 of 6 immunomodulatory (IM), 1 of 4 mesenchymal (M), 1 of 5 luminal androgen receptor (LAR) and 2 of 8 mesenchymal stem cell (MSL) showed lower frequencies of SOX10 expression. There was negative correlation between SOX10 and AR+ subtypes (P < .002). SOX10 was positively correlated with WT1 (P = .05). SOX10 did not show significant correlation with mammaglobin, GCDFP15, EGFR, CK5/6 and GATA3. SOX10 expression in the basal-like and unstable molecular subtypes supports the concept that these neoplasms show myoepithelial differentiation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen receptor; Basal-like; Molecular subtypes; SOX10; Triple-negative breast cancer; WT1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29894722      PMCID: PMC8126991          DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  38 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Ian E Smith; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sox10--a marker for not only schwannian and melanocytic neoplasms but also myoepithelial cell tumors of soft tissue: a systematic analysis of 5134 tumors.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Peter A McCue; Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala; Wojciech Biernat; Piotr Czapiewski; Janusz Kopczynski; Lester D Thompson; Jerzy Lasota; Zengfeng Wang; John F Fetsch
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  SOXs in human prostate cancer: implication as progression and prognosis factors.

Authors:  Wei-de Zhong; Guo-qiang Qin; Qi-shan Dai; Zhao-dong Han; Shan-ming Chen; Xiao-hui Ling; Xin Fu; Chao Cai; Jia-hong Chen; Xi-bin Chen; Zhuo-yuan Lin; Ye-han Deng; Shu-lin Wu; Hui-chan He; Chin-lee Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  p63 expression in breast cancer: a highly sensitive and specific marker of metaplastic carcinoma.

Authors:  Meryem M Koker; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 6.  Role of SOX family of transcription factors in central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Arlet M Acanda de la Rocha; Nicolas Sampron; Marta M Alonso; Ander Matheu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  SOX10 is a novel marker of acinus and intercalated duct differentiation in salivary gland tumors: a clue to the histogenesis for tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  Rie Ohtomo; Taisuke Mori; Shinsuke Shibata; Koji Tsuta; Akiko M Maeshima; Chihiro Akazawa; Yukio Watabe; Kazufumi Honda; Tesshi Yamada; Seiichi Yoshimoto; Masao Asai; Hideyuki Okano; Yae Kanai; Hitoshi Tsuda
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 8.  Sorting out Sox10 functions in neural crest development.

Authors:  Robert N Kelsh
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  High expression of Sox10 correlates with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Zhi-Gang Liu; Jiao Tang; Ren-Fang Zou; Xiao-Yan Chen; Guan-Min Jiang; Yan-Fang Qiu; Hui Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  SOX10, a novel HMG-box-containing tumor suppressor, inhibits growth and metastasis of digestive cancers by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Authors:  Xin Tong; Lili Li; Xiaoyan Li; Lei Heng; Lan Zhong; Xianwei Su; Rong Rong; Shi Hu; Wenjia Liu; Baoqing Jia; Xing Liu; Geng Kou; Jun Han; Shangjing Guo; Yi Hu; Cheng Li; Qian Tao; Yajun Guo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-11-15
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Role of SOX Proteins in Breast Cancer Development and Maintenance.

Authors:  Gaurav A Mehta; Pooja Khanna; Michael L Gatza
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Pan-cancer analysis of advanced patient tumors reveals interactions between therapy and genomic landscapes.

Authors:  Erin Pleasance; Emma Titmuss; Laura Williamson; Harwood Kwan; Luka Culibrk; Eric Y Zhao; Katherine Dixon; Kevin Fan; Reanne Bowlby; Martin R Jones; Yaoqing Shen; Jasleen K Grewal; Jahanshah Ashkani; Kathleen Wee; Cameron J Grisdale; My Linh Thibodeau; Zoltan Bozoky; Hillary Pearson; Elisa Majounie; Tariq Vira; Reva Shenwai; Karen L Mungall; Eric Chuah; Anna Davies; Mya Warren; Caralyn Reisle; Melika Bonakdar; Gregory A Taylor; Veronika Csizmok; Simon K Chan; Zusheng Zong; Steve Bilobram; Amir Muhammadzadeh; Darryl D'Souza; Richard D Corbett; Daniel MacMillan; Marcus Carreira; Caleb Choo; Dustin Bleile; Sara Sadeghi; Wei Zhang; Tina Wong; Dean Cheng; Scott D Brown; Robert A Holt; Richard A Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Yongjun Zhao; Jessica Nelson; Alexandra Fok; Yussanne Ma; Michael K C Lee; Jean-Michel Lavoie; Shehara Mendis; Joanna M Karasinska; Balvir Deol; Ana Fisic; David F Schaeffer; Stephen Yip; Kasmintan Schrader; Dean A Regier; Deirdre Weymann; Stephen Chia; Karen Gelmon; Anna Tinker; Sophie Sun; Howard Lim; Daniel J Renouf; Janessa Laskin; Steven J M Jones; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-04-13

3.  Combination of GATA3, SOX-10, and PAX8 in a Comprehensive Panel to Diagnose Breast Cancer Metastases.

Authors:  Kiyong Na; Ha Young Woo; Sung-Im DO; So-Woon Kim
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Prognostic Significance of p16 Protein Expression in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Magdi M Salih; Amjed A Higgo; Emad M Eed
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  Sex-Determining Region Y Chromosome-Related High-Mobility-Group Box 10 in Cancer: A Potential Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Liming Yu; Fan Peng; Xue Dong; Ying Chen; Dongdong Sun; Shuai Jiang; Chao Deng
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-12-03

6.  Immunohistological Expression of SOX-10 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Analysis of 113 Samples.

Authors:  Katharina Kriegsmann; Christa Flechtenmacher; Jörg Heil; Jörg Kriegsmann; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Sebastian Aulmann; Wilko Weichert; Hans-Peter Sinn; Mark Kriegsmann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Genome Instability-Derived Genes Are Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maoni Guo; San Ming Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.