Literature DB >> 29894226

Relative and Absolute Quantitation in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.

J Astor Ankney1, Adil Muneer1, Xian Chen1,2.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics is a powerful tool for gaining insights into function and dynamics of biological systems. However, peptides with different sequences have different ionization efficiencies, and their intensities in a mass spectrum are not correlated with their abundances. Therefore, various label-free or stable isotope label-based quantitation methods have emerged to assist mass spectrometry to perform comparative proteomic experiments, thus enabling nonbiased identification of thousands of proteins differentially expressed in healthy versus diseased cells. Here, we discuss the most widely used label-free and metabolic-, enzymatic-, and chemical labeling-based proteomic strategies for relative and absolute quantitation. We summarize the specific strengths and weaknesses of each technique in terms of quantification accuracy, proteome coverage, multiplexing capability, and robustness. Applications of each strategy for solving specific biological complexities are also presented.

Keywords:  label-free quantitation; metabolic labeling; stable isotope labeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29894226     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-045357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)        ISSN: 1936-1327            Impact factor:   10.745


  22 in total

Review 1.  Peptide-based Interaction Proteomics.

Authors:  Katrina Meyer; Matthias Selbach
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Improved Single-Cell Proteome Coverage Using Narrow-Bore Packed NanoLC Columns and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Yongzheng Cong; Yiran Liang; Khatereh Motamedchaboki; Romain Huguet; Thy Truong; Rui Zhao; Yufeng Shen; Daniel Lopez-Ferrer; Ying Zhu; Ryan T Kelly
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  The Arabidopsis PeptideAtlas: Harnessing worldwide proteomics data to create a comprehensive community proteomics resource.

Authors:  Klaas J van Wijk; Tami Leppert; Qi Sun; Sascha S Boguraev; Zhi Sun; Luis Mendoza; Eric W Deutsch
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 12.085

4.  Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Murine Ocular Tissue and the Extracellular Environment.

Authors:  Jason Yeung; Jeffrey Lamb; Jonathan R Krieger; Mihaela Gadjeva; Jennifer Geddes-McAlister
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2020-09

Review 5.  Proteomic/transcriptomic analysis of erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Marjorie Brand; Jeffrey A Ranish
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 6.  Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin.

Authors:  Henning Ummethum; Stephan Hamperl
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics to Unveil the Non-coding RNA World.

Authors:  Roberto Giambruno; Marija Mihailovich; Tiziana Bonaldi
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-11-08

8.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of prostate tissue specimens identifies deregulated protein complexes in primary prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bo Zhou; Yiwu Yan; Yang Wang; Sungyong You; Michael R Freeman; Wei Yang
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 3.988

9.  Development of Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Quantitation of Proteins Enriched in the Postsynaptic Density (PSD).

Authors:  Rashaun S Wilson; Navin Rauniyar; Fumika Sakaue; TuKiet T Lam; Kenneth R Williams; Angus C Nairn
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2019-04-02

10.  Mapping the Proteome of the Synaptic Cleft through Proximity Labeling Reveals New Cleft Proteins.

Authors:  Tony Cijsouw; Austin M Ramsey; TuKiet T Lam; Beatrice E Carbone; Thomas A Blanpied; Thomas Biederer
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2018-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.