| Literature DB >> 29892585 |
Vinicius de Brito Rodrigues1, Josiano Valério2, Francisco Zaniolo2, Mark Deeke2, Marco Pedroni2, Ademir Schuroff2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the change in the CE angle of Wiberg and the acetabular index after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy is statistically significant.Entities:
Keywords: Acetabulum; Biomechanical phenomena; Hip dislocation; Osteotomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29892585 PMCID: PMC5993875 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1CE angle of Wiberg on Surgimap.
Fig. 2Postoperative CE angle of Wiberg on Surgimap.
Descriptive measures.
| Operative | Side | Measurements | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Median | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Right | CE angle of Wiberg | 16.0 | 8 | 7 | 37 | 14.5 | 9.89 |
| Acetabular index | 23.1 | 8 | 16 | 34 | 23 | 5.67 | ||
| Left | CE angle of Wiberg | 7.3 | 6 | −11 | 18 | 12 | 11.38 | |
| Acetabular index | 30.8 | 6 | 14 | 43 | 32 | 10.65 | ||
| Post | Right | CE angle of Wiberg | 31.0 | 8 | 17 | 48 | 31.5 | 8.68 |
| Acetabular index | 14.8 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 14.5 | 7.03 | ||
| Left | CE angle of Wiberg | 23.0 | 6 | 3 | 38 | 28.5 | 14.25 | |
| Acetabular index | 17.7 | 6 | 5 | 40 | 14.5 | 13.22 |
Fig. 3CE angle of Wiberg.
Fig. 4Acetabular index.
Pre vs. postoperative comparisons.
| Measurements | Side | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE angle of Wiberg | Right | 8 | 0.00 | 0.005 |
| Left | 6 | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| Acetabular index | Right | 8 | 0.00 | 0.005 |
| Left | 6 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
Right vs. left comparisons.
| Sum | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operative | R | L | U | R | L | ||
| Pre | CE angle of Wiberg | 79.0 | 26.0 | 11.0 | 9 | 5 | 0.147 |
| Acetabular index | 51.0 | 54.0 | 6.0 | 9 | 5 | 0.029 | |
| Post | CE angle of Wiberg | 76.0 | 29.0 | 14.0 | 9 | 5 | 0.298 |
| Acetabular index | 60.5 | 44.5 | 15.5 | 9 | 5 | 0.364 | |