Literature DB >> 29891725

Pembrolizumab Exposure-Response Assessments Challenged by Association of Cancer Cachexia and Catabolic Clearance.

David C Turner1, Anna G Kondic1, Keaven M Anderson1, Andrew G Robinson2, Edward B Garon3, Jonathan Wesley Riess4, Lokesh Jain1, Kapil Mayawala1, Jiannan Kang1, Scot W Ebbinghaus1, Vikram Sinha1, Dinesh P de Alwis1, Julie A Stone5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship of pembrolizumab pharmacokinetics (PK) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PK dependencies in OS were evaluated across three pembrolizumab studies of either 200 mg or 2 to 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W). Kaplan-Meier plots of OS, stratified by dose, exposure, and baseline clearance (CL0), were assessed per indication and study. A Cox proportional hazards model was implemented to explore imbalances of typical prognostic factors in high/low NSCLC CL0 subgroups.
RESULTS: A total of 1,453 subjects were included: 340 with pembrolizumab-treated melanoma, 804 with pembrolizumab-treated NSCLC, and 309 with docetaxel-treated NSCLC. OS was dose independent from 2 to 10 mg/kg for pembrolizumab-treated melanoma [HR = 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.02] and NSCLC (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.01); however, a strong CL0-OS association was identified for both cancer types (unadjusted melanoma HR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.72-3.80 and NSCLC HR = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.94-3.57). Decreased OS in subjects with higher pembrolizumab CL0 paralleled disease severity markers associated with end-stage cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Correction for baseline prognostic factors did not fully attenuate the CL0-OS association (multivariate-adjusted CL0 HR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.06-2.52 for melanoma and HR = 1.88; 95% CI, 1.22-2.89 for NSCLC).
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the lack of dose or exposure dependency in pembrolizumab OS for melanoma and NSCLC between 2 and 10 mg/kg. An association of pembrolizumab CL0 with OS potentially reflects catabolic activity as a marker of disease severity versus a direct PK-related impact of pembrolizumab on efficacy. Similar data from other trials suggest such patterns of exposure-response confounding may be a broader phenomenon generalizable to antineoplastic mAbs.See related commentary by Coss et al., p. 5787. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29891725     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  60 in total

Review 1.  Setting the Dose of Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of Clinical Pharmacology.

Authors:  Etienne Chatelut; Félicien Le Louedec; Gérard Milano
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Effect of Prognostic Nutrition Index in Gastric or Gastro-oesophageal Junction Cancer Patients Undergoing Nivolumab Monotherapy.

Authors:  Takashi Oshima; Hayato Watanabe; Takanobu Yamada; Keisuke Komori; Kentaro Hara; Kazuki Kano; Kosuke Takahashi; Yuta Kumazu; Hirohito Fujikawa; Masakatsu Numata; Toru Aoyama; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Yasuhiro Inokuchi; Nozomu Machida; Manabu Shiozawa; Norio Yukawa; Soichiro Morinaga; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda; Takashi Ogata
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  In Reply.

Authors:  Apostolos Papachristos; Polychronis Kemos; Haralabos Kalofonos; Gregory Sivolapenko
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-26

4.  Correlation Between Bevacizumab Exposure and Survival Does Not Necessarily Imply Causality.

Authors:  Félicien Le Louedec; Etienne Chatelut
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-26

Review 5.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships.

Authors:  Cyril Leven; Maël Padelli; Jean-Luc Carré; Eric Bellissant; Laurent Misery
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Immune checkpoint blockade in solid organ tumours: Choice, dose and predictors of response.

Authors:  Vishal Navani; Moira C Graves; Nikola A Bowden; Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Time-dependent population PK models of single-agent atezolizumab in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Mathilde Marchand; Rong Zhang; Phyllis Chan; Valerie Quarmby; Marcus Ballinger; Nitzan Sternheim; Benjamin Wu; Jin Y Jin; René Bruno
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Cachectic Cancer Patients: Immune to Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy?

Authors:  Christopher C Coss; Steven K Clinton; Mitch A Phelps
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Myeloid immunosuppression and immune checkpoints in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Kyohei Nakamura; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.530

10.  Impact of Baseline Nutrition and Exercise Status on Toxicity and Outcomes in Phase I and II Oncology Clinical Trial Participants.

Authors:  Rishi Jain; Elizabeth Handorf; Vipin Khare; Matthew Blau; Yana Chertock; Michael J Hall
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.