Hai Qian1, Kwaku Appiah-Kubi2, Ying Wang1, Min Wu1, Yan Tao1, Yan Wu1, Yongchang Chen3. 1. Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212013, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212013, People's Republic of China; Department of Applied Biology, University for Development Studies, Navrongo, Ghana. Electronic address: kappiah@uds.edu.gh. 3. Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212013, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: ycchen54@ujs.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The overexpression and mutation of platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) and their receptors (PDGFRs) are widespread in cancers and have been recognized as attractive oncologic targets with diverse therapeutic targets. Reports of the overexpression of genes, proteins and mutations of PDGFs/PDGFRs in gastric cancer and their associations with clinicopathological features, Western and Asian patients, as well as prognostic role have shown variable outcomes. This study sought to employ meta-analysis to evaluate PDGFs/PDGFRs status prognostic significance and their association with clinicopathological features of gastric cancer. METHOD: A comprehensive search of PubMed database for studies that investigated the overexpression of mRNA/Protein and mutation of PDGFs/PDGFRs in gastric cancer of Western and Asian patients, their prognostic significance and association with clinicopathological characteristics in May, 2017 or earlier was carried out by two reviewers independently. Pooled odd ratios and hazard ratios at 95% confidence intervals were estimated and summarized using fixed-effect and random-effect Mantel-Haenszel models and Inverse Variance models in Review Manager software version 5.3. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 16 datasets of 1178 patients were included in meta-analysis. Fourteen studies of 1178 patients with 1446 cases and 7 studies of 1076 patients with 1280 cases were included in meta-analysis of clinicopathological and prognostic significance of high or positive PDGF/PDGFR status respectively. Odd ratio at 95% confidence intervals for different groups of analysis are as follows: males versus females(OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.04-1.83, POR = 0.03); ≥T2 stage versus T1 stage(OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.22-3.49, POR = 0.007); nodal metastasis versus no nodal metastasis(OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.48-5.22, POR = 0.002); TNM stage ≥II versus TNM stage I(OR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.89-6.69, POR<0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the association of PDGF/PDGFR among Western patients(OR = 0.24 95% CI: 0.10-0.58, POR = 0.002) and association of PDGFs/PDGFRs gene mutation among gastric cancer patients(OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.45, POR = 0.0008) were significant. The association of PDGFs/PDGFRs in young and middle age versus elderly aged, undifferentiated versus well differentiated tumors, large tumor size group(>6 cm) versus small tumor size group(≤6 cm) were insignificant. Subgroup analysis of the association of PDGFs/PDGFRs among Western Asian patients; PDGF/PDGFR mRNA expression and protein expression among gastric cancer patients were insignificant. In addition, PDGF/PDGFR status among gastric cancer patients was insignificant in overall effect analysis PDGF/PDGFR status has shown to predict reduced overall survival(HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.49-3.22, PHR = 0.64) and relapse free survival(HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.36-2.41, PHR = 0.88) insignificantly. Also, overall prognostic effect analysis(HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.58-1.96, PHR = 0.84) was insignificant. CONCLUSION: PDGFs/PDGFRs status amongst gastric cancer patients plays a key role in clinical variables and nodal metastasis. These insights might be helpful in providing guidelines for diagnosis, molecular target therapy, and prognosis of gastric cancer.
BACKGROUND: The overexpression and mutation of platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) and their receptors (PDGFRs) are widespread in cancers and have been recognized as attractive oncologic targets with diverse therapeutic targets. Reports of the overexpression of genes, proteins and mutations of PDGFs/PDGFRs in gastric cancer and their associations with clinicopathological features, Western and Asian patients, as well as prognostic role have shown variable outcomes. This study sought to employ meta-analysis to evaluate PDGFs/PDGFRs status prognostic significance and their association with clinicopathological features of gastric cancer. METHOD: A comprehensive search of PubMed database for studies that investigated the overexpression of mRNA/Protein and mutation of PDGFs/PDGFRs in gastric cancer of Western and Asian patients, their prognostic significance and association with clinicopathological characteristics in May, 2017 or earlier was carried out by two reviewers independently. Pooled odd ratios and hazard ratios at 95% confidence intervals were estimated and summarized using fixed-effect and random-effect Mantel-Haenszel models and Inverse Variance models in Review Manager software version 5.3. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 16 datasets of 1178 patients were included in meta-analysis. Fourteen studies of 1178 patients with 1446 cases and 7 studies of 1076 patients with 1280 cases were included in meta-analysis of clinicopathological and prognostic significance of high or positive PDGF/PDGFR status respectively. Odd ratio at 95% confidence intervals for different groups of analysis are as follows: males versus females(OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.04-1.83, POR = 0.03); ≥T2 stage versus T1 stage(OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.22-3.49, POR = 0.007); nodal metastasis versus no nodal metastasis(OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.48-5.22, POR = 0.002); TNM stage ≥II versus TNM stage I(OR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.89-6.69, POR<0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the association of PDGF/PDGFR among Western patients(OR = 0.24 95% CI: 0.10-0.58, POR = 0.002) and association of PDGFs/PDGFRs gene mutation among gastric cancerpatients(OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.45, POR = 0.0008) were significant. The association of PDGFs/PDGFRs in young and middle age versus elderly aged, undifferentiated versus well differentiated tumors, large tumor size group(>6 cm) versus small tumor size group(≤6 cm) were insignificant. Subgroup analysis of the association of PDGFs/PDGFRs among Western Asian patients; PDGF/PDGFR mRNA expression and protein expression among gastric cancerpatients were insignificant. In addition, PDGF/PDGFR status among gastric cancerpatients was insignificant in overall effect analysis PDGF/PDGFR status has shown to predict reduced overall survival(HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.49-3.22, PHR = 0.64) and relapse free survival(HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.36-2.41, PHR = 0.88) insignificantly. Also, overall prognostic effect analysis(HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.58-1.96, PHR = 0.84) was insignificant. CONCLUSION: PDGFs/PDGFRs status amongst gastric cancerpatients plays a key role in clinical variables and nodal metastasis. These insights might be helpful in providing guidelines for diagnosis, molecular target therapy, and prognosis of gastric cancer.
Authors: Jaana van Gastel; Jhana O Hendrickx; Hanne Leysen; Paula Santos-Otte; Louis M Luttrell; Bronwen Martin; Stuart Maudsley Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 5.810