Literature DB >> 29891103

Which patient and doctor behaviours make a medical consultation more effective from a patient point of view. Results from a European multicentre study in 31 countries.

Maria Angela Mazzi1, Michela Rimondini2, Egbert van der Zee3, Wienke Boerma4, Christa Zimmermann2, Jozien Bensing4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess European patients' preferences regarding seven aspects of doctor-patient communication.
METHODS: 6049 patients from 31 European countries evaluated 21 doctor and 12 patient behaviours, through a patient-generated questionnaire (PCVq). Multilevel models explored the effects of patient characteristics, contextual and cultural dimensions on preferences.
RESULTS: Patients attributed more responsibility to doctors, by giving greater importance to doctor than to patient factors, in particular to Treating the patient as a partner and as a person and Continuity of care. Gender, age, education, the presence of chronic illness and two of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Individualism and Indulgence, showed differential evaluations among patients. Women gave greater importance to all seven communication aspects, older patients to being prepared for the consultation, lower educated patients to Treating patient as a person and Thoughtful planning. Patients from countries with an indulgent background rated all seven communication aspects of greater importance. A more individualistic orientation was related to lower importance regarding the four doctor's factors and the patient factor Open and Honest.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating the patient as a person and providing continuity of care emerged as universal values. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The findings should represent a landmark for the adaptation of patient-generated communication guidelines and programs in Europe.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contextual and individual features; Cross-national research; Hofstede’s cultural dimensions; Multilevel linear regressions; Patient consultation values questionnaire; Patients’ preferences; Primary care communication

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29891103     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

1.  "I pretty much followed the law, and there weren't any decisions to make": A qualitative study of self-advocacy experiences of men with cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Hagan Thomas; Makenna L Hadley; Marci Lee Nilsen
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Translation and cultural adaptation of a romanian version of the communication assessment tool (CAT_Ro).

Authors:  Andra Rodica Balanescu; Violeta Claudia Bojinca; Ana-Maria Schweitzer; Bogdan Joca; Denise Ani Mardale; Denisa Badea; Mihai Bojinca
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Béré Mahoney; Elaine Walklet; Eleanor Bradley; Steve O'Hickey
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 4.  Covering patient's perspective in case-based critical review articles to improve shared decision making in complex cases.

Authors:  Louis-Rachid Salmi; Pierre Côté; Christine Cedraschi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients' and Nurses' Perspectives.

Authors:  Angela Tolotti; Serena Barello; Camilla Vignaduzzo; Sarah Jayne Liptrott; Dario Valcarenghi; Tiziana Nania; Davide Sari; Loris Bonetti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Responsibilities and capabilities of health engagement professionals (HEPs): Perspectives from HEPs and health consumers in Australia.

Authors:  Lisa Tam; Kara Burns; Katherine Barnes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.