Literature DB >> 29891091

Evaluation of radiomic texture feature error due to MRI acquisition and reconstruction: A simulation study utilizing ground truth.

Fei Yang1, Nesrin Dogan1, Radka Stoyanova1, John Chetley Ford2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the dependence of image texture features on MR acquisition parameters and reconstruction using a digital MR imaging phantom. MR signal was simulated in a parallel imaging radiofrequency coil setting as well as a single element volume coil setting, with varying levels of acquisition noise, three acceleration factors, and four image reconstruction algorithms. Twenty-six texture features were measured on the simulated images, ground truth images, and clinical brain images. Subtle algorithm-dependent errors were observed on reconstructed phantom images, even in the absence of added noise. Sources of image error include Gibbs ringing at image edge gradients (tissue interfaces) and well-known artifacts due to high acceleration; two of the iterative reconstruction algorithms studied were able to mitigate these image errors. The difference of the texture features from ground truth, and their variance over reconstruction algorithm and parallel imaging acceleration factor, were compared to the clinical "effect size", i.e., the feature difference between high- and low-grade tumors on T1- and T2-weighted brain MR images of twenty glioma patients. The measured feature error (difference from ground truth) was small for some features, but substantial for others. The feature variance due to reconstruction algorithm and acceleration factor were generally smaller than the clinical effect size. Certain texture features may be preserved by MR imaging, but adequate precautions need to be taken regarding their validity and reliability. We present a general simulation framework for assessing the robustness and accuracy of radiomic textural features under various MR acquisition/reconstruction scenarios.
Copyright © 2018 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Radiomics; Repeatability; Texture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29891091     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  30 in total

1.  External validation of a combined PET and MRI radiomics model for prediction of recurrence in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  François Lucia; Dimitris Visvikis; Martin Vallières; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Omar Miranda; Philippe Robin; Pietro Andrea Bonaffini; Joanne Alfieri; Ingrid Masson; Augustin Mervoyer; Caroline Reinhold; Olivier Pradier; Mathieu Hatt; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Radiomics Approach Outperforms Diameter Criteria for Predicting Pathological Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis After Neoadjuvant (Chemo)Radiotherapy in Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ryota Nakanishi; Takashi Akiyoshi; Shigeo Toda; Yu Murakami; Senzo Taguchi; Koji Oba; Yutaka Hanaoka; Toshiya Nagasaki; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Shuichiro Matoba; Masashi Ueno; Yosuke Fukunaga; Hiroya Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Test-retest repeatability of a deep learning architecture in detecting and segmenting clinically significant prostate cancer on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.

Authors:  Amogh Hiremath; Rakesh Shiradkar; Harri Merisaari; Prateek Prasanna; Otto Ettala; Pekka Taimen; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Felix Ehret; David Kaul; Hans Clusmann; Daniel Delev; Julius M Kernbach
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping.

Authors:  Kyle J Lafata; Yuqi Wang; Brandon Konkel; Fang-Fang Yin; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-25

6.  Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm reduces image noise while alters radiomics features in dual-energy CT in comparison with conventional iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhong; Yihan Xia; Yong Chen; Jianying Li; Wei Lu; Xiaomeng Shi; Jianxing Feng; Fuhua Yan; Weiwu Yao; Huan Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  Combining Radiomics and Blood Test Biomarkers to Predict the Response of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer to Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Seung Hyuck Jeon; Changhoon Song; Eui Kyu Chie; Bohyoung Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Won Chang; Yoon Jin Lee; Joo-Hyun Chung; Jin Beom Chung; Keun-Wook Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Jae-Sung Kim
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Deep Convolutional Radiomic Features on Diffusion Tensor Images for Classification of Glioma Grades.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Jingjing Xiao; Shandong Wu; Fajin Lv; Junwei Gong; Lin Jiang; Renqiang Yu; Tianyou Luo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Prospective Evaluation of Repeatability and Robustness of Radiomic Descriptors in Healthy Brain Tissue Regions In Vivo Across Systematic Variations in T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Parameters.

Authors:  Brendan Eck; Prathyush V Chirra; Avani Muchhala; Sophia Hall; Kaustav Bera; Pallavi Tiwari; Anant Madabhushi; Nicole Seiberlich; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.119

Review 10.  Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics.

Authors:  Michele Avanzo; Lise Wei; Joseph Stancanello; Martin Vallières; Arvind Rao; Olivier Morin; Sarah A Mattonen; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.