| Literature DB >> 29890971 |
Roberta Cimmino1, Carmela M A Barone2, Salvatore Claps3, Ettore Varricchio4, Domenico Rufrano3, Mariangela Caroprese5, Marzia Albenzio5, Pasquale De Palo6, Giuseppe Campanile7, Gianluca Neglia7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diet supplementation with polyphenols is a novel strategy to improve meat quality in livestock, by preventing oxidative deterioration of lipids and protein. Polyphenols have beneficial effects on both human and animal health and can be obtained from several sources, such as olive mill wastewaters (OMWW). These are severe environmental pollutants and therefore may be recycled and utilized in other sectors. The aim of this study was to evaluate growth performance, meat characteristics, fatty acid composition, antioxidant status, different forms of myoglobin and malondialdehyde formation in kids who received a diet supplemented with polyphenols obtained from OMWW. Weaned goat kids (n = 18) were divided into two homogenous groups: control (C) group (n = 9) received a fattening standard diet while the other group (n = 9) received the same diet, supplemented with 3.2 mg/day of polyphenols powder extract (PE group). Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated 10 days apart throughout the study. After 78 days, the kids were slaughtered and pH and carcass yield were evaluated. Longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle was collected and utilized for chemical analysis, meat quality evaluation and oxidative stability.Entities:
Keywords: Fatty acids; Kids; Malondialdehyde; Polyphenols; Sensory evaluation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29890971 PMCID: PMC5996534 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1513-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Ingredients (%) and proximate composition (% of dry matter) of the basal diet administered to the kids throughout the experimental period
| Ingredients (%) of concentrate administered | ||
|---|---|---|
| Maize meal | 60 | |
| Faba bean ( | 15 | |
| Alfalfa pellets | 5 | |
| Soybean meal | 5 | |
| Wheat bran | 10 | |
| Oat | 5 | |
| Concentrate | Dehydrated alfalfa | |
| Dry Matter (g/100 g weight) | 87.5 | 85.6 |
| Ash | 2.7 | 8.3 |
| Crude protein | 11.8 | 19.5 |
| Crude fiber | 6.19 | 25.6 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 18.2 | 37.5 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 8.9 | 34.3 |
| Lignin | 2.1 | 9.8 |
| Ether extract | 3.8 | 1.9 |
| Non structural carbohydrates | 63.5 | 25.6 |
| Starch | 56.8 | – |
Main phenolic compounds of olive mill wastewaters (OMWW) extracts
| Main compounds | mg/kg | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxytyrosol | 20,829 | 21.27 |
| Flavonoid | 3278 | 3.35 |
| Tyrosol | 3947 | 4.03 |
| Caffeic acid | 9991 | 10.20 |
| Verbascoside | 17,449 | 17.82 |
| Hydroxytyrosol derivatives (OHTY-glycol, OHTY-glucoside, 3,4-diidrossifenilethanol – 3,4-DHPEA Elenolic acid mono-Aldehyde, 3,4-DHPEA– AC hydroxytyrosol acetate) | 26,826 | 27.40 |
| Verbascoside derivatives (isoverbascoside, β-hydroxyverbascoside,β-hydroxyisoverbascoside) | 6498 | 6.64 |
| Other derivatives of cinnamic acid (cinnamic acid, | 3372 | 3.44 |
| Caffeic acid derivatives (chlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid, 1- | 4681 | 4.78 |
| Other polyphenols | 1055 | 1.08 |
| Total polyphenols (TPC) (mg/kg) | 97,926 | |
| Antioxidant activity (mmolitrolox/kg sample) | 8521 |
Age and weight at weaning and at slaughter, average daily gain (ADG), feed consumption, carcass characteristics and dressing percentage in Control (C) and polyphenols extract (PE) group (mean values ± SEM)
| Groups | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C | PE | P | |
| Age at weaning (days) | 69.8 ± 1.30 | 68.9 ± 1.50 | 0.65 |
| Age at slaughtering (days) | 146.8 ± 1.30 | 145.9 ± 1.50 | 0.65 |
| Weaning body weight (kg) | 11.0 ± 0.75 | 10.7 ± 0.86 | 0.78 |
| Final body weight (kg) | 17.9 ± 0.99 | 18.6 ± 1.28 | 0.69 |
| Weight gain (kg) | 6.94 ± 0.60 | 7.93 ± 0.61 | 0.26 |
| ADG (kg/g) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.26 |
| Concentrate intake (kg/day) | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.29 ± 0.00 | 0.33 |
| Hay intake (kg/day) | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 0.39 |
| DM intake (kg/day) | 0.84 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.57 |
| Carcass weight at slaughtering (kg) | 10.0 ± 0.51 | 10.0 ± 0.77 | 0.98 |
| Carcass weight at 24 h (kg) | 9.7 ± 0.50 | 9.7 ± 0.74 | 0.99 |
| pH at slaughtering | 6.8 ± 0.11 | 6.8 ± 0.12 | 0.90 |
| pH at 24 h | 5.8 ± 0.03 | 5.8 ± 0.03 | 0.64 |
| Dressing at slaughtering (%) | 55.8 ± 1.41 | 54.0 ± 0.48 | 0.15 |
| Dressing at 24 h (%) | 54.6 ± 1.39 | 52.3 ± 0.45 | 0.14 |
Proximate meat composition of LTL muscle in control (C) and polyphenols extract (PE) group (mean values ± SEM)
| Groups | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C | PE | P | |
| Moisture (%) | 66.6 ± 0.46 | 64.1 ± 0.35 | 0.11 |
| Fat (%) | 13.7 ± 0.46 | 16.5 ± 0.31 | 0.09 |
| Protein (%) | 18.3 ± 0.30 | 18.7 ± 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Collagen (%) | 2.3 ± 0.28 | 3.0 ± 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Ash (%) | 0.91 ± 0.12 | 0.84 ± 0.05 | 0.58 |
| pH* | 6.1 ± 0.01 | 6.2 ± 0.01 | 0.51 |
*pH was assessed on LTL sample 48 h after slaughtering
Shear myofibrillar force (SMF) and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WBSF) recorded in the LTL muscle of control (C) and polyphenols extract (PE) group (mean values ± SEM)
| Groups | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C | PE | P | |
| WBSF, kg | 4.5 ± 0.10 | 4.6 ± 0.10 | 0.86 |
| SMF, kg | 0.53 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.33 | 0.06 |
Fig. 1Difference of color (∆E) by 1 to 7 days of storage with illuminant D65 (a) and illuminant A (b), in control (c) and polyphenols extract (PE) group (blue) and treated (green) group. The error bars represent standard error
Estimated levels (mean percentage ± SEM) of metmyoglobin (MMb) and oxymyoglobin (OMb), in the LTL muscle of control (C) and treated (PE) group, throughout the storage at 4 °C
| Groups | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMb | C | 40.73 ± 1.88 | 45.28 ± 1.18 | 53.57 ± 1.67 | 61.78 ± 3.60 |
| PE | 40.99 ± 1.94 | 47.67 ± 1.52 | 54.41 ± 1.88 | 63.37 ± 3.94 | |
| OMb | C | 68.93 ± 2.70 | 34.04 ± 3.04 | 15.07 ± 3.24 | 43.87 ± 9.42 |
| PE | 62.66 ± 7.02 | 38.13 ± 4.83 | 21.42 ± 5.69 | 51.48 ± 10.28 |
Mean fatty acid composition (g/100 g of FAME) of LTL muscle in control (C) and polyphenols extract (PE) group (mean values ± SEM)
| Groups | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty Acids | C | PE | P |
| < C12:0 | 2.93 ± 0.50 B | 0.35 ± 0.40 A | 0.001 |
| C12:0 | 0.45 ± 0.36 | 0.20 ± 0.07 | 0.06 |
| C14:0 | 4.00 ± 0.58 b | 2.28 ± 0.47 a | 0.04 |
| C14:1 | 0.46 ± 0.06 B | 0.23 ± 0.05 A | 0.01 |
| C15:0 | 0.58 ± 0.06 b | 0.41 ± 0.05 a | 0.04 |
| C16:0 | 23.81 ± 0.85B | 20.22 ± 0.70A | 0.01 |
| C16:1 | 3.05 ± 0.41 b | 1.63 ± 0.33 a | 0.02 |
| C17:0 | 1.12 ± 0.17 | 1.17 ± 0.14 | 0.79 |
| C17:1 | 1.33 ± 0.17 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 0.08 |
| C18:0 | 15.60 ± 1.25 | 14.31 ± 1.02 | 0.43 |
| C18:1 cis | 27.16 ± 3.15 a | 36.01 ± 2.57 b | 0.05 |
| C18:1 trans | 0.08 ± 0.73 | 1.64 ± 0.60 | 0.12 |
| C18:2 cis | 12.22 ± 1.07 | 13.64 ± 0.88 | 0.32 |
| C18:2 trans n6 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.09 |
| C18:3 n6 γ-linolenic | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.43 |
| C20:0 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.74 |
| C20:1 | 1.62 ± 0.15 | 1.59 ± 0.12 | 0.89 |
| C20:2 n6 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.31 |
| CLA cis 9–trans 11 | 1.22 ± 0.12 | 1.02 ± 0.10 | 0.24 |
| C20:3 n3 | 1.00 ± 0.40 | 1.22 ± 0.33 | 0.67 |
| C20:4 n6 | 0.72 ± 0.75 | 1.63 ± 0.61 | 0.36 |
| C22:0 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.27 ± 0.10 | 0.76 |
| C22:6 n3 | 0.63 ± 0.40 | 0.24 ± 0.33 | 0.47 |
| C24:0 | 0.33 ± 0.20 | 0.26 ± 0.16 | 0.77 |
| C24:1 | 0.63 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.31 | 0.39 |
| PUFA n6 | 13.62 ± 0.96 | 15.77 ± 1.30 | 0.31 |
| PUFA n3 | 1.63 ± 0.75 | 1.47 ± 0.61 | 0.86 |
| n6/n3 | 8.36 ± 0.86 | 10.73 ± 0.91 | 0.41 |
| ΣSFA | 49.22 ± 2.39B | 39.51 ± 1.95A | 0.01 |
| ΣMUFA | 34.35 ± 2.84a | 42.22 ± 2.32b | 0.05 |
| ΣPUFA | 16.47 ± 2.02 | 18.26 ± 1.65 | 0.51 |
| UFA:SFA | 1.08 ± 0.13 A | 1.55 ± 0.07 B | 0.01 |
| PUFA:SFA | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.09 |
| AI | 1.28 ± 0.19 b | 0.69 ± 0.16 a | 0.03 |
| TI | 2.13 ± 0.32B | 1.38 ± 0.26 A | 0.01 |
Different superscript letters within the same row indicate significant differences (a.,b.: P < 0.05; A.,B.: P < 0.01)
Note: Σ SFA = (
UFA:SFA = [(ΣMUFA+ΣPUFA)/ΣSFA],
PUFA:SFA = (ΣPUFA/ΣSFA),
AI: [(4 x C14:0) + C16:0 + C18:0] / [ΣMUFA +ΣPUFA-n6 + ΣPUFA-n3],
TI: [(C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0) / (0.5xMUFA) + (0.5xPUFA-n6) + (3xPUFA-n3) + (PUFA-n3 / PUFA-n6)]
Fig. 2Lipid peroxidation in meat during the days of storage (expressed in MDA nmol/μg of meat), the error bars represent standard error