Literature DB >> 29890010

Repeating measurements by transient elastography in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with high liver stiffness.

Jeremy Chak-Lun Chow1, Grace Lai-Hung Wong1,2, Anthony Wing-Hung Chan3, Sally She-Ting Shu1,2, Carmen Ka-Man Chan1,2, Julie Ka-Yu Leung1,2, Paul Cheung-Lung Choi3, Angel Mei-Ling Chim1,2, Henry Lik-Yuen Chan1,2, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Baveno VI Consensus recommends repeating examination in patients with high liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography to reduce false-positive diagnosis of advanced liver disease. We tested whether repeating transient elastography can increase the overall diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent two FibroScan examinations within 6 months prior to liver biopsy were evaluated. An LSM cut-off of 7.9 kPa was used to exclude F3-4 fibrosis.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients had high LSM at baseline, among whom 27 had low LSM on repeated testing; only four had F3 and none had cirrhosis. In contrast, 31 of 51 patients with high LSM at both examinations had F3-4. Nineteen patients had low LSM at baseline; none of them had F3-4 regardless of the second LSM results. If we took LSM <7.9 kPa at either examination as sufficient to exclude F3-4, the negative predictive value remained high at 91%. The positive predictive value for F3-4 increased from 45% in patients with high LSM at baseline to 61% in those with high LSM at both examinations. Sensitivity analysis using different cut-offs yielded similar results, with 76% of patients with LSM >12 kPa at both examinations having F3-4.
CONCLUSIONS: Transient elastography is a highly sensitive screening test to exclude F3-4 fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. One-third of patients with high LSM may have normal results on repeated examination. By repeating examination in cases with high LSM, one may spare patients from unnecessary liver biopsy.
© 2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FibroScan; liver biopsy; liver fibrosis; liver stiffness measurement; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29890010     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  6 in total

Review 1.  CON: This Patient Should Have a Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Staging.

Authors:  Rohit Nathan; Deepanshu Jain; Simona Rossi
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-10-09

2.  Reduced and more appropriate referrals of patients with type 2 diabetes using liver stiffness measurement compared to FIB-4.

Authors:  William Shanahan; Isha Bagwe; Mary Jane Brassill; Paud O'Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Determination of "indeterminate score" measurements in lean nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients from western Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Yasir Mohammed Khayyat
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

4.  Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography for Assessment of Liver Fibrosis at a USA Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Max Shen; Anna Lee; Jay H Lefkowitch; Howard J Worman
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-13

Review 5.  Elastography Techniques for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Yasushi Honda; Masato Yoneda; Kento Imajo; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in community setting: A cohort study using controlled attenuation parameter-transient elastography.

Authors:  Nicha Teeratorn; Panida Piyachaturawat; Kessarin Thanapirom; Roongruedee Chaiteerakij; Kanokwan Sonsiri; Piyawat Komolmit; Pisit Tangkijvanich; Rungsun Rerknimitr; Leon Adams; Sombat Treeprasertsuk
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-09-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.