William Shanahan1, Isha Bagwe2, Mary Jane Brassill2, Paud O'Regan3. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Tipperary University Hospital, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, Ireland. shanahaw@tcd.ie. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Tipperary University Hospital, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, Ireland. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Tipperary University Hospital, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fatty liver disease and fibrosis are common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently published European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines have suggested screening such patients using liver stiffness measurement (LSM) or fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) to exclude advanced fibrosis. AIMS: We initiated a screening programme at the diabetes out-patient clinic to assess the reliability of the suggested approaches and resulting referrals. METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive patients attending for T2DM review at an Irish level 3 (district general) hospital between September and November 2021 were screened for liver fibrosis using LSM and had their FIB-4 calculated. The first 100 patients with valid LSM measurements were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Referral rates to the hepatology clinic varied by modality used. If FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 criterion was used, the referral rate to the hepatology clinic was 45%; using LSM < 8 kPa to rule out advanced fibrosis resulted in 34% referral rate; using LSM ≥ 10 kPa to suggest probable compensated advanced chronic liver disease reduced referral rates to 15%. Combining FIB-4 with LSM in a two-step algorithm led to missed potentially significant liver disease in large numbers. 47% patients with LSM ≥ 8 kPa and 33% with LSM ≥ 10 kPa had FIB-4 < 1.3. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of patients with T2DM using LSM alone rather than FIB-4 leads to reduced numbers of, and more appropriate, referrals to the hepatology clinic. Shifting from an exclusion (LSM < 8 kPa) to an inclusion based (LSM ≥ 10 kPa) approach may lessen the potential of screening to overwhelm hepatology services.
BACKGROUND: Fatty liver disease and fibrosis are common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently published European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines have suggested screening such patients using liver stiffness measurement (LSM) or fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) to exclude advanced fibrosis. AIMS: We initiated a screening programme at the diabetes out-patient clinic to assess the reliability of the suggested approaches and resulting referrals. METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive patients attending for T2DM review at an Irish level 3 (district general) hospital between September and November 2021 were screened for liver fibrosis using LSM and had their FIB-4 calculated. The first 100 patients with valid LSM measurements were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Referral rates to the hepatology clinic varied by modality used. If FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 criterion was used, the referral rate to the hepatology clinic was 45%; using LSM < 8 kPa to rule out advanced fibrosis resulted in 34% referral rate; using LSM ≥ 10 kPa to suggest probable compensated advanced chronic liver disease reduced referral rates to 15%. Combining FIB-4 with LSM in a two-step algorithm led to missed potentially significant liver disease in large numbers. 47% patients with LSM ≥ 8 kPa and 33% with LSM ≥ 10 kPa had FIB-4 < 1.3. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of patients with T2DM using LSM alone rather than FIB-4 leads to reduced numbers of, and more appropriate, referrals to the hepatology clinic. Shifting from an exclusion (LSM < 8 kPa) to an inclusion based (LSM ≥ 10 kPa) approach may lessen the potential of screening to overwhelm hepatology services.
Authors: Richard K Sterling; Eduardo Lissen; Nathan Clumeck; Ricard Sola; Mendes Cassia Correa; Julio Montaner; Mark S Sulkowski; Francesca J Torriani; Doug T Dieterich; David L Thomas; Diethelm Messinger; Mark Nelson Journal: Hepatology Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Cristiane V Tovo; Cristiane A Villela-Nogueira; Nathalie C Leite; Carine L Panke; Gabriela Z Port; Sabrina Fernandes; Caroline Buss; Gabriela P Coral; Ana C Cardoso; Claudia M Cravo; Fernanda L Calçado; Guilherme F M Rezende; Frederico C Ferreira; João M Araujo-Neto; Renata de M Perez; Henrique S Moraes-Coelho; Angelo A de Mattos Journal: Ann Hepatol Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 2.400
Authors: Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Michael Charlton; Kenneth Cusi; Mary Rinella; Stephen A Harrison; Elizabeth M Brunt; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Luis C Bertot; Gary P Jeffrey; Bastiaan de Boer; Gerry MacQuillan; George Garas; Justin Chin; Yi Huang; Leon A Adams Journal: Liver Int Date: 2018-03-31 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Fernando Bril; Michael J McPhaul; Michael P Caulfield; Virginia C Clark; Consuelo Soldevilla-Pico; Roberto J Firpi-Morell; Jinping Lai; Dov Shiffman; Charles M Rowland; Kenneth Cusi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 19.112