Literature DB >> 29889330

The initiation of cannabis use in adolescence is predicted by sex-specific psychosocial and neurobiological features.

Philip A Spechler1,2,3, Nicholas Allgaier3, Bader Chaarani1,3, Robert Whelan4, Richard Watts5, Catherine Orr3, Matthew D Albaugh3, Nicholas D'Alberto3, Stephen T Higgins1,2,3, Kelsey E Hudson2, Scott Mackey3, Alexandra Potter3, Tobias Banaschewski6, Arun L W Bokde7, Uli Bromberg8, Christian Büchel8, Anna Cattrell9, Patricia J Conrod10, Sylvane Desrivières9, Herta Flor11,12, Vincent Frouin13, Jürgen Gallinat14, Penny Gowland15, Andreas Heinz16, Bernd Ittermann17, Jean-Luc Martinot18, Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot19,20, Frauke Nees6,11, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos13, Tomáš Paus21, Luise Poustka22,23, Michael N Smolka24, Henrik Walter16, Gunter Schumann9, Robert R Althoff2,3, Hugh Garavan1,2,3.   

Abstract

Cannabis use initiated during adolescence might precipitate negative consequences in adulthood. Thus, predicting adolescent cannabis use prior to any exposure will inform the aetiology of substance abuse by disentangling predictors from consequences of use. In this prediction study, data were drawn from the IMAGEN sample, a longitudinal study of adolescence. All selected participants (n = 1,581) were cannabis-naïve at age 14. Those reporting any cannabis use (out of six ordinal use levels) by age 16 were included in the outcome group (N = 365, males n = 207). Cannabis-naïve participants at age 14 and 16 were included in the comparison group (N = 1,216, males n = 538). Psychosocial, brain and genetic features were measured at age 14 prior to any exposure. Cross-validated regularized logistic regressions for each use level by sex were used to perform feature selection and obtain prediction error statistics on independent observations. Predictors were probed for sex- and drug-specificity using post-hoc logistic regressions. Models reliably predicted use as indicated by satisfactory prediction error statistics, and contained psychosocial features common to both sexes. However, males and females exhibited distinct brain predictors that failed to predict use in the opposite sex or predict binge drinking in independent samples of same-sex participants. Collapsed across sex, genetic variation on catecholamine and opioid receptors marginally predicted use. Using machine learning techniques applied to a large multimodal dataset, we identified a risk profile containing psychosocial and sex-specific brain prognostic markers, which were likely to precede and influence cannabis initiation.
© 2018 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  marijuana; neuroimaging; prediction; specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29889330      PMCID: PMC7444673          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  73 in total

1.  Adolescent illegal drug use: the impact of personality, family, and environmental factors.

Authors:  J S Brook; D W Brook; M De La Rosa; M Whiteman; E Johnson; I Montoya
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-04

2.  Tridimensional personality traits of college student marijuana users.

Authors:  Robert L Hale; Shawn Whiteman; Katrina Muehl; Ellen Faynberg
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2003-04

Review 3.  The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology.

Authors:  G Schumann; E Loth; T Banaschewski; A Barbot; G Barker; C Büchel; P J Conrod; J W Dalley; H Flor; J Gallinat; H Garavan; A Heinz; B Itterman; M Lathrop; C Mallik; K Mann; J-L Martinot; T Paus; J-B Poline; T W Robbins; M Rietschel; L Reed; M Smolka; R Spanagel; C Speiser; D N Stephens; A Ströhle; M Struve
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 4.  Advances in the field of cannabinoid--opioid cross-talk.

Authors:  Patricia Robledo; Fernando Berrendero; Andrés Ozaita; Rafael Maldonado
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Changes in Cannabis Potency Over the Last 2 Decades (1995-2014): Analysis of Current Data in the United States.

Authors:  Mahmoud A ElSohly; Zlatko Mehmedic; Susan Foster; Chandrani Gon; Suman Chandra; James C Church
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Predicting life-time and regular cannabis use during adolescence; the roles of temperament and peer substance use: the TRAILS study.

Authors:  Hanneke E Creemers; Jan K Dijkstra; Wilma A M Vollebergh; Johan Ormel; Frank C Verhulst; Anja C Huizink
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Trajectory of adolescent cannabis use on addiction vulnerability.

Authors:  Yasmin L Hurd; Michael Michaelides; Michael L Miller; Didier Jutras-Aswad
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Differentiating Common Predictors and Outcomes of Marijuana Initiation: A Retrospective Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Jason T Siegel; William D Crano; Eusebio M Alvaro; Andrew Lac; Justin D Hackett; Zachary P Hohman
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.164

9.  A self-administered rating scale for pubertal development.

Authors:  M A Carskadon; C Acebo
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 10.  Puberty as a highly vulnerable developmental period for the consequences of cannabis exposure.

Authors:  Miriam Schneider
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.280

View more
  9 in total

1.  Shared Genetic Etiology between Cortical Brain Morphology and Tobacco, Alcohol, and Cannabis Use.

Authors:  Jill A Rabinowitz; Adrian I Campos; Jue-Sheng Ong; Luis M García-Marín; Sarael Alcauter; Brittany L Mitchell; Katrina L Grasby; Gabriel Cuéllar-Partida; Nathan A Gillespie; Andrew S Huhn; Nicholas G Martin; Paul M Thompson; Sarah E Medland; Brion S Maher; Miguel E Rentería
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  Systematic review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of cannabis use in adolescence and emerging adulthood: evidence from 90 studies and 9441 participants.

Authors:  Sarah D Lichenstein; Nick Manco; Lora M Cope; Leslie Egbo; Kathleen A Garrison; Jillian Hardee; Ansel T Hillmer; Kristen Reeder; Elisa F Stern; Patrick Worhunsky; Sarah W Yip
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 8.294

3.  Addiction in focus: molecular mechanisms, model systems, circuit maps, risk prediction and the quest for effective interventions.

Authors:  Rita Z Goldstein; Michel Barrot; Barry J Everitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Cannabis and the developing brain: What does the evidence say?

Authors:  Joanna Jacobus; Kelly E Courtney; Elizabeth A Hodgdon; Rachel Baca
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Examining the association between exposure to various screen time sedentary behaviours and cannabis use among youth in the COMPASS study.

Authors:  Amanda Doggett; Wei Qian; Katelyn Godin; Margaret De Groh; Scott T Leatherdale
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-09-17

6.  Machine learning approaches for parsing comorbidity/heterogeneity in antisociality and substance use disorders: A primer.

Authors:  Matthew S Shane; William J Denomme
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-15

7.  Explainable machine learning analysis reveals sex and gender differences in the phenotypic and neurobiological markers of Cannabis Use Disorder.

Authors:  Gregory R Niklason; Eric Rawls; Sisi Ma; Erich Kummerfeld; Andrea M Maxwell; Leyla R Brucar; Gunner Drossel; Anna Zilverstand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Longitudinal associations between amygdala reactivity and cannabis use in a large sample of adolescents.

Authors:  Philip A Spechler; Bader Chaarani; Catherine Orr; Matthew D Albaugh; Nicholas R Fontaine; Stephen T Higgins; Tobias Banaschewski; Arun L W Bokde; Erin Burke Quinlan; Sylvane Desrivières; Herta Flor; Antoine Grigis; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Eric Artiges; Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Tomáš Paus; Luise Poustka; Sarah Hohmann; Juliane H Fröhner; Michael N Smolka; Henrik Walter; Robert Whelan; Gunter Schumann; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 4.415

9.  The IMAGEN study: a decade of imaging genetics in adolescents.

Authors:  Lea Mascarell Maričić; Henrik Walter; Gunter Schumann; Andreas Heinz; Annika Rosenthal; Stephan Ripke; Erin Burke Quinlan; Tobias Banaschewski; Gareth J Barker; Arun L W Bokde; Uli Bromberg; Christian Büchel; Sylvane Desrivières; Herta Flor; Vincent Frouin; Hugh Garavan; Bernd Itterman; Jean-Luc Martinot; Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Tomáš Paus; Luise Poustka; Sarah Hohmann; Michael N Smolka; Juliane H Fröhner; Robert Whelan; Jakob Kaminski
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 13.437

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.